May I offer a rather controversial point of view, something that Gratiot has been talking toward?
First, we know that the SEALs brought the hostage out of the situation, with 3 of the 4 pirates now dead. The fourth is in "custody" (whatever that means in The Anointed One's administration).
Second, it seems to me that this thread is being highly critical of Uncle Zero (for good reason), but according to Reuters, this is how the thing played out:
A U.S. Navy commander made a split-second decision to fire on the pirates because he believed that Phillips, who tried to escape on Friday, faced imminent danger amid tense hostage talks with his captors and deteriorating sea conditions.
"They were pointing the AK-47s at the captain," Vice Admiral William Gortney, head of the U.S. Naval Central Command, said in a Pentagon briefing from Bahrain.
"The on-scene commander took it as the captain was in imminent danger and then made that decision (to kill the pirates) and he had the authorities to make that decision and he had seconds to make that decision."
President Barack Obama granted the Pentagon's request for standing authority to use appropriate force to save the life of the captain, Gortney said.
ReutersSeems to me that this thing went down exactly like it should've - the hostage was rescued and most of the bad guys are dead. One left over for intel - however that plays out, we'll never know (unless Uncle Zero's admnistration leaks the info, which is always more than likely).
Bottom line - apart from the fact that it took Uncle Zero five freakin' days to make a comment on this situation, the end result is what matters.
Based on Reuters' report, His Holiness took himself out of the equation long enough to allow the commander on the scene to make a call - and that's exactly what happened.
WTF is wrong with that?
Let the bitch slaps commence....