Author Topic: Palin launches new PAC  (Read 16742 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline AllosaursRus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11672
  • Reputation: +424/-293
  • Skip Tracing by Contract Only!
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #75 on: January 28, 2009, 05:03:28 PM »
so you're saying you voted for obama & not mccain ??

mccain was my   only choice towards the end, but because dittoheads attacked him & gave the lib media fodder & turned off Indies, obama won...

as for me, I chose mccain over obama & did not bitch, just like I chose GWB over Gore & did not bitch, because we had no choice & it was for the good of conservative america...

You are by far the dumbest **** I have ever come across on this web site! Not even the Night Owl is this ****ing stupid!!!!!!

If you voted for McCain because you thought he was the less of 2 evils, then surely it shows you don't have a brain in your head!

I voted for McCain and by the way Bush, because I did not want MY COUNTRY to turn into France or, heaven forbid, Venezuela!

You have the intelligence of an amoeba! Why do you waste our time with your drivel?

Do you just need to have someone change your diaper? Friggin PUTZ!!!!!!!!
« Last Edit: January 28, 2009, 05:14:37 PM by AllosaursRus »
I'm the guy your mother warned you about!
 

Offline Zeus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3265
  • Reputation: +174/-112
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #76 on: January 28, 2009, 05:06:12 PM »
Rick Perry/Sarah Palin 2012
It is said that branches draw their life from the vine. Each is separate yet all are one as they share one life giving stem . The Bible tells us we are called to a similar union in life, our lives with the life of God. We are incorporated into him; made sharers in his life. Apart from this union we can do nothing.

Offline Redstatecka

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
  • Reputation: +55/-3
  • Thanks, Dad!
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #77 on: January 28, 2009, 06:55:02 PM »
I voted for McCain and by the way Bush, because I did not want MY COUNTRY to turn into France or, heaven forbid, Venezuela!

I voted for McCain and Bush X 2 because I didn't want the U.S. to turn into not just France (never though about Venezuela), but also not into an incinerated wasteland or one in which parts of it, if not all of it, were under seige.

That and I figured the Constitution had worked for a long whle and it was and remains worth preserving.
"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ! For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity and freedom of worship here." -- Patrick Henry, 1765

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5601
  • Reputation: +265/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #78 on: January 28, 2009, 07:17:04 PM »
Rick Perry/Sarah Palin 2012

Mark Sanford/Say-Rah Palin 2012
Disclaimer
Any views, remarks or statements of other military services or it’s members is covered under the Inter-Service Rivalry Act of 1974

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #79 on: January 28, 2009, 11:32:25 PM »
Rick Perry/Sarah Palin 2012

I'm not so sure I'd agree with that Zeus. Maybe if you have them the other way around. Perry would be an ok VP, but I don't see him as POTUS. He'd try to push a nationwide trans-US corridor down our throats. He hasn't exactly been my favorite governor. It's gonna be really interesting here in the Republic of Texas when he and Kay Baily-Hutchinson start rollin' in the dirt.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #80 on: January 28, 2009, 11:33:23 PM »
I'm not so sure I'd agree with that Zeus. Maybe if you have them the other way around. Perry would be an ok VP, but I don't see him as POTUS. He'd try to push a nationwide trans-US corridor down our throats. He hasn't exactly been my favorite governor. It's gonna be really interesting here in the Republic of Texas when he and Kay Baily-Hutchinson start rollin' in the dirt.

Hey what about Jindal?  He seems to be true to real Conservative principles.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #81 on: January 29, 2009, 07:48:31 AM »
Whatever Sanford runs for, he has my vote.
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline john c calhoun

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 471
  • Reputation: +16/-108
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #82 on: January 29, 2009, 09:22:40 AM »
From the start of the Presidential race, Obama had it in the bag unless he made some serious mistakes. Eight years of the Repubs and Bush was enough for most independents to want a change. The economy was tanking and I doubt that any Repub outside of digging up and reviving Reagan would have worked against the Magic Negro.

Palin did energize the Repub base and without her McCain would have lost by more than 10% rather than 6%. Many hard core conservatives would have stayed home if he had picked a moderate or another RINO. McCain put the final nail in his coffin when he suspended his campaign, went to DC and supported the bank bailout. The public was against this. Since he supported the bailout, it was like he rode into town on a jackass rather than a knight in shining armor on a white horse. That stupidity plus muzzling his VP doomed McCain.

Sarah Palin is the only hope I see in 012. That may all change if Obama's economic program is a disaster and the Repubs gain back seats in the House or Senate.

great points lacarnut....

Mccain supporting the bailout, was more of his affirmation of being Bush's guy...

yet the very same morons around here & the majority of 'the base' that trashed mccain, still doesn't see that mccain supported nearly everything bush did...and THATS WHY HE LOST ...

GWB's mold is NOT the one to follow...

these neo cons  don't seem to get that...

Offline Redstatecka

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
  • Reputation: +55/-3
  • Thanks, Dad!
Re: Palin launches new PAC
« Reply #83 on: January 29, 2009, 12:28:47 PM »
great points lacarnut....

Mccain supporting the bailout, was more of his affirmation of being Bush's guy...

yet the very same morons around here & the majority of 'the base' that trashed mccain, still doesn't see that mccain supported nearly everything bush did...and THATS WHY HE LOST ...

GWB's mold is NOT the one to follow...

these neo cons  don't seem to get that...

If Bush's mold is not the one to follow, then why does Barack Hussein Obama seem to be sounding more and more like him in certain ways?

Could it be that Obama, unlike you and most of the other 63 million who voted for the empty suit from Chicago, knows things now that help explain certain of President Bush's actions and policies?

BTW: Guess you've missed Obama's full-out support for the bailout, which really is the 2009 Democrat/Liberal/Leftist Pork-Barrel Giveaway. On this Obama-inspired madness, any criticism of Bush is misplaced.

And BTW, your slinging around "neo-cons" sounds hip, but do you even know what a neo-conservative or conservative is? No need to answer.

Enrolled in those civility and social-adjustment courses yet, along with the reading-comprehension programs?
"It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians not on religions, but on the gospel of Jesus Christ! For this very reason, peoples of other faiths have been afforded asylum, prosperity and freedom of worship here." -- Patrick Henry, 1765