BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp

[CollectivismMustDie]

What does that compare next to your need to be vindictive against another woman simply for existing.   

Says she who thinks, believes, feels, and states that people are entitled to the goods and services of others, simply for existing.


CMD

[Traveshamockery]

Yes, I can see that you have absolutely no respect for property or the law,  What does that compare next to your need to be vindictive against another woman simply for existing.  You're obviously projecting about the male attention thing.  You got nastily catty because you weren't getting all the attention.   You're clearly pathetically desperate for online male attention, so I am more than happy to leave you to it.  

BigDog, obviously not the U of M picture.  I'm talking about the one the chronically insecure traveshamockery felt compelled to print out and show to her husband, and the one someone else here posted in the past couple of weeks.  

That Traveshmockery even felt a need to bother to show the pic to her husband is revealing. (Oh, no.  They aren't looking at me. I must feel prettier, even if I have nothing whatsoever to say).  I know the type.  Not a female friend, hates women, insults other women because she feels in constant competition with them and thinks it earns her points with the boys.  Really that kind of behavior demonstrates a very sad self-loathing toward your own womanhood.  

Peace.  

I showed a picture to my husband and we both laughed and laughed and laughed.  I'm hardly vindictive; I just happen to think anyone who believes in the liberal way of life is an idiot.  That makes you an idiot.  Now, **** off you silly big ass liberal.  

I get plenty of attention from my conservative husband, even after many years together. I didn't seek out male attention from this website before your skanky ass arrived here and I have no desire to seek it out after you're banned like you were once before. 

I am thinking the university where you are employed may be interested in the fact that you are using state resources and time to post on a conservative board, though.  At the very least, my friends in Minnesota who are taxpayers may not be very happy, either.  

So, there's that, Alex.  

[Bad Dog]

Just got back from a great evening with Mrs. Dog and my sister (not the same person).  Is the skank still here?  Did she ever bust out the puppies?  Has she charmed any converts, I was getting nervous about the Zombie.  He's PINTOBEAN you know.

[Charles Henrickson]

Everyone knows it's BainsBane (sung to the tune of Everyone knows its Wendy)

I think this one might work better. Click the music link and sing along!

BAINSBANE
Tune:  "Bang Bang"

At the DUmp there's one we see
With her degree, Ph.DD
She hates men, she hates Rethugs
But she really loves her jugs

BainsBane, Miss Alex Brown
BainsBane, of DUmp renown
BainsBane, so big around
BainsBane, around the Underground

People said at DOTY time
She needs support, so get in line
We would always laugh and say
She's racking up the votes OK

BainsBane, Miss Alex Brown
BainsBane, of DUmp renown
BainsBane, so big around
BainsBane, around the Underground

DOTY vote, she didn't flop
Alex came up near the top

Hey! . . . Hey! . . . Hey! . . . Hey!

Now she's here inside the Cave
She must have balls, she's being brave
Just look at what the Cavers gave:
Attention, all that she could crave

BainsBane, Miss Alex Brown
BainsBane, of DUmp renown
BainsBane, so big around
BainsBane, around the Underground

[Dblhaul]

You people are getting nastier by the moment.  Obviously you don't want me here, so that's fine.  Keep up the hate.  You obviously live for it.  

You are the one who keeps coming back! 

Attention whore is all I can think you are. Maybe if you had a different attitude you could find a man that would like you.

[Traveshamockery]

Yes, I can see that you have absolutely no respect for property or the law,  What does that compare next to your need to be vindictive against another woman simply for existing.  You're obviously projecting about the male attention thing.  You got nastily catty because you weren't getting all the attention.   You're clearly pathetically desperate for online male attention, so I am more than happy to leave you to it.  

BigDog, obviously not the U of M picture.  I'm talking about the one the chronically insecure traveshamockery felt compelled to print out and show to her husband, and the one someone else here posted in the past couple of weeks.  

That Traveshmockery even felt a need to bother to show the pic to her husband is revealing. (Oh, no.  They aren't looking at me. I must feel prettier, even if I have nothing whatsoever to say).  I know the type.  Not a female friend, hates women, insults other women because she feels in constant competition with them and thinks it earns her points with the boys.  Really that kind of behavior demonstrates a very sad self-loathing toward your own womanhood.  

Peace.  

He wondered what I was laughing about and I showed him.  He said he understood why I was laughing.  I didn't print out any picture of you when it's all over the place online.  Why would I waste my time?

No self-loathing or need for competition on my part.  I've got everything I want at home and believe me, he gives me all the attention I need.  We have a loving, kind, honest, and interdependent marriage.  When you have that, why seek attention elsewhere like you do, Alex?   

[txradioguy]

Why do they keep calling us teabaggers?  I've never joined or ever gone to one of their meetings. 

All I know about them is that they want smaller government and lower taxes. 

Teabagging is a derrogatory term for a homosexual act.

The Liberals think it's cute and funny to use said term to describe people who associate with the TEA Party...and they smear conservatives in geberal with it as well.

[txradioguy]

More on the anti-choice teabagger doctor forcing women to have abortions.  http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/10/report-anti-choice-republican-forced-mistress-to-have-an-abortion/

So you were against abortion before you were for it?

I thought you were pro abortion?

[txradioguy]

You blamed the crisis first on Obama, then on the Democratic House, including Pelosi.  You demonstrated no interest in discussing the causes of the collapse. 

This coming from someone who's only response seems to be "It's Bush's fault"?

[txradioguy]

Empty words from an empty mind.

And she wonders why men won't pay any attention to her much less have any desire to take her home.

[txradioguy]

That shows a complete disregard for property rights and makes you a CRIMINAL.  Each and every time someone here uses that photo, they are willfully and purposefully violating the property rights of others and engaging in criminal activity.

So Alex, does that mean that every time your fellow Libtards posted a pic or personal information about me they were "willfully and purposefully violating the property rights of others and engaging in criminal activity"?

See that kind of activity you claime to deplore....was being done by the mouth breathing window lickers at DU LONG before any of us decided to turn the tables on you and play your game.

My only crime was writing a letter to the editor disagreeing with one of your fellow Libtards about AFN Programming.

DU has splattered my face my real name and photos of me all over that stupid little echo chamber numerous times without my permission.

So cry me a ****ing river about your stupid intellectual property rights...you'd have to have an intellect first to be able to claims rights over it.

If you don't want the world to know who you are where you work what you look like etc...here's a tip don't put it out on the internet for everyone to see...and especailly...don't post it at DU.

[txradioguy]

In fact, liberals believe that choice is the woman's. 

If that's true then why is the only "choice" you seem to support murder?

You rail against babies being born into poverty...there are women who are in poverty as well. By that reasoning we should kill poor women, not just babies who MIGHT end up in poverty right?

To a liberal it's more ethical to KILL an unborn baby than for a women to have to endure pregnancy after she VOLUNTARILY (with few exceptions) had sex that she KNEW could result in pregnancy.

[Big Dog]

BigDog, obviously not the U of M picture.  I'm talking about the one the chronically insecure traveshamockery felt compelled to print out and show to her husband, and the one someone else here posted in the past couple of weeks.  

I missed it. I was kinda busy.

[miskie]

Your site has been informed that you are using that photo if violation of Photobucket's privacy and Photobucket provisions.  In downloading it or continuing to use a photo which is not legally publicly accessible on the web, you are engaging in THEFT.  That shows a complete disregard for property rights and makes you a CRIMINAL.  Each and every time someone here uses that photo, they are willfully and purposefully violating the property rights of others and engaging in criminal activity.  Photobucket removed those pictures for a reason, yet you lack enough respect for PROPERTY rights to follow the law.  That shows how completely hollow your political ideology is.  If property rights can be used to justify allowing 25,000 people to die every year, it's all good, but if violating property rights allows you to make fun of someone who dares to think differently from you, the hell with the law.  That is hypocrisy, which is of course the hallmark of teabaggers.  

But you posted it on DU - You need to read the DU terms of use again.

Voluntary Public Disclosure

The Democratic Underground Site may include features, such as discussion forums, blog comment forms and related tools, that allow users to publicly share information about themselves. Any information a user discloses in these areas is publicly available on the Internet. Such information may be read, archived, collected, or used by other Internet users, including automated services such as search engines. Democratic Underground is not responsible for personally identifiable information you choose to publicly disclose, and urges users to exercise caution when disclosing information that may be personal in nature.

In other words, anything you post on DU is fair game. If you are unhappy with that, then you need to find another place to post.

[Big Dog]

Ah, well... I guess I'll don a skin tight shirt and take pictures to make myself feel better.

 

[BlueStateSaint]

You got that right!
















 

[vesta111]

If that's true then why is the only "choice" you seem to support murder?

You rail against babies being born into poverty...there are women who are in poverty as well. By that reasoning we should kill poor women, not just babies who MIGHT end up in poverty right?

To a liberal it's more ethical to KILL an unborn baby than for a women to have to endure pregnancy after she VOLUNTARILY (with few exceptions) had sex that she KNEW could result in pregnancy.

I am flummoxed, here, so lets go to science for answers and ignore the morals for a while.    

What part of procreation do you not understand ANTI-?    Men are not just sperm donors to a female, actually if the baby is a male child the mother carries a baby much more different then themselves.   The child has  a different sex from the mother, different hormones of the mother and some kind of ability to think and act physically from the mother.  

I see you have never experienced the amazement of expelling from ones body of a creature oh so different from ourselves.   Woman have the JOB of carring a small life to birth, then the job of trying to understand the fact that no matter hard one tries to raise a different sex from themselves, we will never understand the male mind.  Or in many cases that of our daughters as well.

So, to claim a woman's body is her own to do with as she pleases is far fetched to say the least when it comes to the cycle of life.

Now one can choose to get a vasectomy or a quick cut the tubes, but regulations used to require a  age limit to do so. People by circumstances do change their minds at a later date.

Unfortunately for the male they have no right to their child at any time and have to fight for their rights to reproduce.

This is how we all came to be born, woman do not clone themselves like worms do. Baby's do not come out of a cabbage patch or some big bird deliver them to the doorstep.

What on earth were females of all creatures put on this planet for but to reproduce and that almost always involves a little help from a male. { or a turkey baster.} or from the bottom of a long black tube with sperm from some stranger.

To have killed a developing child is to deny the awesome power of life and relegate the female to have the RIGHT to kill at will with the male just a sperm donor.

Then we hear of cases of people being charged with murder of a pregnant woman and child. There are times when a woman will be killed in an accident and Doctors battle trying to keep a 2 pound so called fetus alive. Why on earth would they bother if they themselves decided this baby was no different then a tumor at that point??

Just for shits and giggles get a tour of a neonatal wing in a hospital.  Some of the strides made in medicine have humans that are kept alive to grow into adults and have children of their own.

Some of these baby's weigh about the size of a pound of butter, well short of the cut off time for an abortion.  

Once the magic starts and like a lightning bolt from the sky's when egg meets sperm, life begins, a human being is forming and has all the rights to life YOU do.



So, who decides if this lump of flesh a tumor or a humane being.

  

[JohnnyReb]

If DUmmie intellectual property rights were real property subject to taxation then the government would owe them money because of it's negative value..........wait a minute..........the government is already paying them for being stupid. Welfare, foodstamps, section 8, disability, etc., etc., etc., etc.,............etc.

[wasp69]

Alright, alright...  No pictures.   

[wasp69]

I showed a picture to my husband and we both laughed and laughed and laughed.  I'm hardly vindictive; I just happen to think anyone who believes in the liberal way of life is an idiot.  That makes you an idiot.  Now, **** off you silly big ass liberal.  

I get plenty of attention from my conservative husband, even after many years together. I didn't seek out male attention from this website before your skanky ass arrived here and I have no desire to seek it out after you're banned like you were once before. 

I am thinking the university where you are employed may be interested in the fact that you are using state resources and time to post on a conservative board, though.  At the very least, my friends in Minnesota who are taxpayers may not be very happy, either.  

So, there's that, Alex.  

Don't sweat it, it's not anything you did.  The DUmmie was getting its ass handed to it on multiple fronts and you were the convenient excuse to have an indignant exit.  Typical arrested development, emotional cripple, drama queenery.

[wasp69]

Hey, DUmmie, I know you're still lurking about.  I have something for you to take back to the good "Doctor":

Media hype about mass shootings in America has fostered a myth that the killings are on the rise and that an assault weapon ban, expanded background checks and greater attention to the mentally ill will curb a rampaging epidemic, according to an authoritative and exhaustive study by a noted criminologist.

Instead, according to James Alan Fox, author and criminology professor at Northeastern University, mass shootings have remained stagnant over 34 years, averaging 20 a year, and few were committed by the type of berserk psychos portrayed by the media.

They reviewed years of mass shootings and found that most shooters are not the crazed killers pictured on TV: Most are seeking revenge and practice their crime, like the two Columbine, Colo., killers.

“The rarest form of mass murder is the completely random attack,” said the study, “Mass Shootings in America: Moving Beyond Newtown.”

He addressed 10 myths fostered by the press. Key among them:

— Expanded background checks will stop killers from getting guns. The study cites a study from former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns that in 93 recent mass shootings, the gun buyers didn’t have a criminal or mental health record. “People cannot be denied their Second Amendment rights just because they look strange or act in an odd manner,” wrote Fox and DeLateur.

— An assault weapons ban would work. They found that the typical weapon used is a pistol, not an “assault weapon” like the semi-automatic AR-15 rifle. Assault weapons were used in 24.6 percent of mass shootings, handguns in 47.9 percent. And limiting the size of magazines weapons can carry wouldn’t help, they said, because any ban would impact new sales and “there is an ample supply of large capacity magazines already in circulation.”

When you see her, send her my regards...

[CollectivismMustDie]

 

CMD

[Purple Sage]

I am flummoxed, here, so lets go to science for answers and ignore the morals for a while.    

What part of procreation do you not understand ANTI-?    Men are not just sperm donors to a female, actually if the baby is a male child the mother carries a baby much more different then themselves.   The child has  a different sex from the mother, different hormones of the mother and some kind of ability to think and act physically from the mother.  

I see you have never experienced the amazement of expelling from ones body of a creature oh so different from ourselves.   Woman have the JOB of carring a small life to birth, then the job of trying to understand the fact that no matter hard one tries to raise a different sex from themselves, we will never understand the male mind.  Or in many cases that of our daughters as well.

So, to claim a woman's body is her own to do with as she pleases is far fetched to say the least when it comes to the cycle of life.

Now one can choose to get a vasectomy or a quick cut the tubes, but regulations used to require a  age limit to do so. People by circumstances do change their minds at a later date.

Unfortunately for the male they have no right to their child at any time and have to fight for their rights to reproduce.

This is how we all came to be born, woman do not clone themselves like worms do. Baby's do not come out of a cabbage patch or some big bird deliver them to the doorstep.

What on earth were females of all creatures put on this planet for but to reproduce and that almost always involves a little help from a male. { or a turkey baster.} or from the bottom of a long black tube with sperm from some stranger.

To have killed a developing child is to deny the awesome power of life and relegate the female to have the RIGHT to kill at will with the male just a sperm donor.

Then we hear of cases of people being charged with murder of a pregnant woman and child. There are times when a woman will be killed in an accident and Doctors battle trying to keep a 2 pound so called fetus alive. Why on earth would they bother if they themselves decided this baby was no different then a tumor at that point??

Just for shits and giggles get a tour of a neonatal wing in a hospital.  Some of the strides made in medicine have humans that are kept alive to grow into adults and have children of their own.

Some of these baby's weigh about the size of a pound of butter, well short of the cut off time for an abortion.  

Once the magic starts and like a lightning bolt from the sky's when egg meets sperm, life begins, a human being is forming and has all the rights to life YOU do.



So, who decides if this lump of flesh a tumor or a humane being.

  

Wow.  I just did something I thought I'd never do... gave Vesta a ^5.  I'd give her a ^10 if I could.  

[Traveshamockery]

 

CMD

H5!

[Traveshamockery]

We all know now that it's been outed where she works, and that taxpayers pay her salary, she will not post here during the day.  If she does, it will be on her "lunch hour," which is probably still paid for by taxpayers.

She's on the dole.