BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp

[Rebel]

The use of the term today, however, really has little to do with the Progressive Movement.  Much like the word liberal, its current use is the US is quite distant from it's original meaning.  Clearly you dislike progressives/liberals, etc... You're a conservative.  But guess what?  The majority of the country votes AGAINST you and has for several election cycles now.  You are a minority in the nation and the GOP appears to be committed to making itself an increasingly smaller minority.  

Once again, you know not a ****ing thing about me, or anyone else on this site. All you DUmbasses can do is project that we want Fascism, lynchings, blacks back on plantations harkening back the days of the Democrat party, etc. I consider myself a "classical liberal". I don't do ****ing party labels, and don't get wrapped up in controlling what anyone else does. This board is not lockstep. That is the mindset and personal ideology of people here. We're not DU where the "tombstone" is as common as conspiracy theories about the BFEE blowing up ****ing levees and single-handedly bringing down towers. It is not the people on this site that are about control.

As for Progressivism, I think it's you that needs to brush up on your history. All I have to do is walk through any number of moonbat rallies and there's a wide array of Marxist publications available. You fools EMBRACE Marxism. You just can't admit you embrace it. Hell, you can't admit anything about your true intentions, even if the lower rung of you don't even know what those intentions are. I assure you, the powers that be in your party do.

[Tucker]

California, seriously?  Not Wyoming or Texas?  Are you a veteran?  

Yes California. I come from back east. I visited LA in the 70's. Came home and made arrangements to make the move permanent.

Not a vet. Never been asked that question at the DUmp so the answer is safe. If someone asks me that question at DU now, I'll lie, or not.

[Freeper]

As opposed to this site, where people wish death on to Democrats and celebrate when an old man like Middle Finger Mom dies.  Here people make comments about wishing DUers would kill themselves, etc.  Really, you are not in a position to cast stones.

You are in no position to cast stones either. We have some people who say some things if I find repulsive, but even on their worst day, it is still not even close to the hate you DUmpmonkeys have. Just look at the comments you fools post about Sarah Palin's family.

[Traveshamockery]

Whoa.  Wait.  What?

You're top-heavy.

I never noticed.  Really.  Cross my heart.  On the Head of St. John the Baptist, I never noticed.

I guess I was always too busy enjoying your pleasant, effervescent, bubbly, good-natured persona to notice anything like that.

I wear a very supportive brassiere so it keeps them tucked away nicely. 

[anti-spelunker]

A city is where I need a gun the most. Only in a liberal paradise is 500+ murders a year acceptable.
And that is Chicago where the city makes impossible to purchase a legal fire arm.

and why is 500+ murders acceptable in Chicago? Its black on black crime. The white liberal elite cares nothing for that. Mayor Rahm's response? "You can arrest your way out of this problem." So he isn't even interested in getting black criminals off the streets.

Liberal city.
Liberal murder rate.
Liberal problem.
and liberals do...nothing again.

You simply cannot trust a liberal to fight crime. They will only disarm innocent people and ignore the criminal.

Virtually all cities are liberal.  Urban areas vote Democratic, while rural, and exurban areas vote Republican.  Suburbs are the swing voters.  Part of the issue with gun policy is that organizations like the NRA have waged successful lawsuits prohibiting cities from governing themselves in regard to gun policy.  They insist on imposing their own policies on municipalities that don't want them.  The gun lobby uses the arm of big government to promote profits for gun makers rather than allowing local control.  

[Rebel]

The part about gun makers allowing the guns get into the hands of criminals who then use them to kill people, or shoot up my car.

Yeah, lot of that going around.  

Hey, are you a Eric Holder and Obama supporter? Just a question.  

blah blah blah ****ing blah

Oh, and Stand Your Ground is totally ****ed.  Existing self defense law already enables someone to shoot without retreat if no safe treat exists.  SYG enables them to shoot EVEN if s safe retreat exists.  That allows unnecessary killing and besides, it's just cowardly.  

Why the **** should I have to run away when someone comes up and threatens to kill or harm me? **** that. Cowardly? At least my ass will be alive. DUmbass. You prefer to create a system where people are terrorized because they're supposed to run away. How about the elderly when they're faced with someone that could be Obama's son who's 60 years younger and fit? Should they try to run away? Yeah, I see that working out real well for the 80 year old.

Logic and common sense aren't your strong suit.

[Bad Dog]

Yes California. I come from back east. I visited LA in the 70's. Came home and made arrangements to make the move permanent.

Not a vet. Never been asked that question at the DUmp so the answer is safe. If someone asks me that question at DU now, I'll lie, or not.

I would normally caution you about this exchange but, since we are dealing with a moron, I will refrain.

[Freeper]

Virtually all cities are liberal.  Urban areas vote Democratic, while rural, and exurban areas vote Republican.  Suburbs are the swing voters.  Part of the issue with gun policy is that organizations like the NRA have waged successful lawsuits prohibiting cities from governing themselves in regard to gun policy.  They insist on imposing their own policies on municipalities that don't want them.  The gun lobby uses the arm of big government to promote profits for gun makers rather than allowing local control.  

Wrong answer cupcake, the constitution does not get checked at the city gates. The constitution protects the right to keep and bear arms.  It says nothing about not being applicable in urban areas. It is not the NRA imposing a whim or a desire, it is about equality under the constitution. You can take your gun bans and shove them up your vagina.

[franksolich]

You know, madam, I really dislike disrailing a thread, but I can't find your comment expressing mystification as to why you've been such a hot topic here.

You're an enigma; I suspect you've been abused by certain men before, but it's clearly a case of misdirected anger when you flail out against men who've never done you any harm, instead of those who have.

Anyway, that's a personal private matter, and you don't have to illuminate on it, any more than one expects the bitter old Vermontese cali primitive to explain away her "Stockholm Syndrome" when it comes to having been used and abused by certain other men.

- - - - - - - - - -

What intrigues me more is you seem to be confused as to how others see you; you seem to think we're looking at a couple of, uh, somethings, but we're not.

This is from cousin nadin's #03 Top DUmmie of 2013 award, in case you missed it:

Okay, now sometimes sob-sisters here whine that it’s “not nice” to “make fun of” the way nadin looks.

And to a point, yes, they’re correct; it’s bad taste, and doesn’t reflect well.

However.

However.

However.

The ways in which an individual conducts himself usually determines the ways in which others see that person.  Someone who’s physically ugly but pleasant in manner successfully minimizes, or even obliterates, the physical ugliness; one doesn’t see that person as ugly at all.

A smile on any fat woman’s face evaporates about a hundred pounds of her, the way one sees her; a gentleness in her manner magically uncrosses the eyes; a comforting word softly spoken removes a garish blemish.

On the flip side of the coin, someone who’s physically ugly and has a piss-poor attitude to match, well, that exaggerates and exacerbates the physical ugliness, making one appear grotesque.

A good attitude about people and things beautifies one; a sour attitude uglifies one.

Well, as the cousin isn’t exactly known for any pleasantness, for any mellowness, for any laid-backness, for any welcoming acceptance of all those people and ideas coming her way, for any warm self-deprecating humor, for any charity and kindness (although one will admit nadin’s probably kind to animals, especially birds), for any tolerance and the admission that she’s human, fallible, well, one can imagine why people see nadin the ways they do.

It’s her own fault; if she were a more pleasant sort of person, some might even think her aesthetic.

[anti-spelunker]

Tell you what don't break into our homes or try to harm us in any way and you have nothing to fear from our guns. This notion that gun owners go around shooting people for fun is a stupid leftist talking point dreamt up by idiots who fear guns.

I can personally assure you I will never break into your or anyone else's home.

I have to say, I give you credit for standing up to the folks here about the grave dancing on MFM.  Please don't be insulted, but you reminded me of myself.  Most people go with what others around them say.  You stood up for what you believe to be right, and what is right.  I admire that quality, even if I disagree with you on just about everything else.  I HATE grave dancing.  (Except in the case of trolls, not real graves).  

[Rebel]

Part of the issue with gun policy is that organizations like the NRA have waged successful lawsuits prohibiting cities from governing themselves in regard to gun policy.   

yeah, that pesky 2nd amendment RIGHT. Damn thing gets in the way all the time, doesn't it?

Tell me, what other rights would you want to see quelled? We have the 2nd, we have the 1st with Christians, any more? Maybe the 4th and 5th for "conservatives"?

[Freeper]

I can personally assure you I will never break into your or anyone else's home.

I have to say, I give you credit for standing up to the folks here about the grave dancing on MFM.  Please don't be insulted, but you reminded me of myself.  Most people go with what others around them say.  You stood up for what you believe to be right, and what is right.  I admire that quality, even if I disagree with you on just about everything else.  I HATE grave dancing.  (Except in the case of trolls, not real graves).  

Then you have nothing to fear from any of our guns. The guns you have a need to fear are already illegally in the hands of those people.

I always stand up for what I believe.

[Rebel]

I have to say, I give you credit for standing up to the folks here about the grave dancing on MFM.  Please don't be insulted, but you reminded me of myself.  Most people go with what others around them say.  You stood up for what you believe to be right, and what is right.  I admire that quality, even if I disagree with you on just about everything else.  I HATE grave dancing.  (Except in the case of trolls, not real graves).  

 

And it can be seen by all your comments to your fellow DUmbasses when they grave dance EVERY ****ING WEEK. Sell crazy someplace else.

[Mike220]

As long as my guns will kill fewer people than Fat Teddy Kennedy's Oldsmobile, how about leaving me the **** alone.

And I suppose I shouldn't tell you about the evil black rifle I'm building. Or the suppressor I'm going to get for it.

[Rebel]

Then you have nothing to fear from any of our guns. The guns you have a need to fear are already illegally in the hands of those people.

I always stand up for what I believe.

Great. Now you have the DUmmie moist. Thanks a pant load, Freeper.

[anti-spelunker]

Progressives are like nazis, they desperately need scapegoats. I think Bainesbane's goal is to criminalize half the population based on mere gender.

Clearly some men do need anti-rape education, as some think having sex with a drunk woman doesn't constitute rape.  Boys need to be taught how to relate to girls and women, just as girls need to be taught how to relate to boys and men.  There is nothing sexist about that.  

Men should also be taught to stand up to friends who think sex with passed out girls is okay.  It is similar to anti-bullying campaigns, which have been enormously effective.  Part of what they target is peer pressure.  Some schools have created climates were bullying is completely socially unacceptable.  The same should be true of rape, or of situations that guys don't think of as rape but is.

 It also bears pointing about that all rape victims are not women.  10% of reported rapes in civil society are men, and a much higher percentage in prison.  Combating rape is about combatting a crime.  It isn't attacking men.  That notion assumes men are by nature rapists, which no rape prevention groups believe and I certainly do not believe that.  

[Freeper]

Great. Now you have the DUmmie moist. Thanks a pant load, Freeper.

She doesn't realize I can beat the snot out of my brother and he can beat the snot out if me, but anyone else gets involved and it's on.

[Crazy Horse]

 Most people go with what others around them say.  

You've got this place confused with DU.   Lock step and agreement between posters is very scarce.

[Bad Dog]

I can personally assure you I will never break into your or anyone else's home.

I have to say, I give you credit for standing up to the folks here about the grave dancing on MFM.  Please don't be insulted, but you reminded me of myself.  Most people go with what others around them say.  You stood up for what you believe to be right, and what is right.  I admire that quality, even if I disagree with you on just about everything else.  I HATE grave dancing.  (Except in the case of trolls, not real graves).  

It is trying so hard to make just one friend over here.  Well, the answer is right in front of you.  I...er...I mean Big Dog will be your friend for life if you'll just bring out those sweater puppies.  

[anti-spelunker]

Then you have nothing to fear from any of our guns. The guns you have a need to fear are already illegally in the hands of those people.

I always stand up for what I believe.

Fair enough. Then why oppose background check legislation designed to keep guns out of the hands of criminals?  Why keep the ATF from having the tools necessary to track and prosecute illegal gun traffickers?  You do realize that most of these laws are in place to protect the profits of the gun lobby, not your gun rights?  

[anti-spelunker]

I would normally caution you about this exchange but, since we are dealing with a moron, I will refrain.

What was that about disliking me because I supposedly think I'm smarter than everyone else and consider you all stupid?  You forget that this is exactly the kind of thing you said the first time I came yet somehow got bent out of shape that I responded in kind. 

[Tucker]

One or two percent of gun owners misuse illegal guns while committing crimes and yet liberals link the other 98% of honest gun owners with the thugs. Liberals can't seem to separate the two.

Conversely, liberals will use the argument that it's only one or two percent of ragheads are terrorists and that the other 98% of muslims shouldn't be linked together with the thugs. Liberals get pissed when accusers can't separate the two.

How are these two argument different?

[anti-spelunker]

And it can be seen by all your comments to your fellow DUmbasses when they grave dance EVERY ****ING WEEK. Sell crazy someplace else.

Right.  You can really see how much they care about what I have to say.  I mentioned it once in the Margaret Thatcher thread.  Now I simply don't read those threads.  

[anti-spelunker]

You've got this place confused with DU.   Lock step and agreement between posters is very scarce.

Actually that is a characteristic of human nature in general. 

[Tucker]

. 

Another BS since my hour restriction has elapsed.