You know, madam, I really dislike disrailing a thread, but I can't find your comment expressing mystification as to why you've been such a hot topic here.
You're an enigma; I suspect you've been abused by certain men before, but it's clearly a case of misdirected anger when you flail out against men who've never done you any harm, instead of those who have.
Anyway, that's a personal private matter, and you don't have to illuminate on it, any more than one expects the bitter old Vermontese cali primitive to explain away her "Stockholm Syndrome" when it comes to having been used and abused by certain other men.
- - - - - - - - - -
What intrigues me more is you seem to be confused as to how others see you; you seem to think we're looking at a couple of, uh, somethings, but we're not.
This is from cousin nadin's #03 Top DUmmie of 2013 award, in case you missed it:
Okay, now sometimes sob-sisters here whine that it’s “not nice†to “make fun of†the way nadin looks.
And to a point, yes, they’re correct; it’s bad taste, and doesn’t reflect well.
However.
However.
However.
The ways in which an individual conducts himself usually determines the ways in which others see that person. Someone who’s physically ugly but pleasant in manner successfully minimizes, or even obliterates, the physical ugliness; one doesn’t see that person as ugly at all.
A smile on any fat woman’s face evaporates about a hundred pounds of her, the way one sees her; a gentleness in her manner magically uncrosses the eyes; a comforting word softly spoken removes a garish blemish.
On the flip side of the coin, someone who’s physically ugly and has a piss-poor attitude to match, well, that exaggerates and exacerbates the physical ugliness, making one appear grotesque.
A good attitude about people and things beautifies one; a sour attitude uglifies one.
Well, as the cousin isn’t exactly known for any pleasantness, for any mellowness, for any laid-backness, for any welcoming acceptance of all those people and ideas coming her way, for any warm self-deprecating humor, for any charity and kindness (although one will admit nadin’s probably kind to animals, especially birds), for any tolerance and the admission that she’s human, fallible, well, one can imagine why people see nadin the ways they do.
It’s her own fault; if she were a more pleasant sort of person, some might even think her aesthetic.