Author Topic: I'm new but there seems to be a lot of firearm threads , to all gun owners on t  (Read 1490 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Quote
newmember (38 posts)

I'm new but there seems to be a lot of firearm threads , to all gun owners on the site


 
I want to state that I support your right to own firearms.

Can't gun owners themselves come together and support common sense laws?
Get rid of handgun ownership since most firearm crimes are committed with handguns.

If a person wanted to own a handgun there could be state owned ranges where the gun would have to be kept.
Limit ownership of rifles that fire one bullet at a time , each time to fire a bullet you would have to pull
the handle back .


This way people could still hunt or target shoot and it wouldn't restrict their hobby.

Does this sound too draconian to the gun owners here?

http://sync.democraticunderground.com/10022731933

We have enough "common sense" laws on the books already.
This notion that the millions of gun owners across this nation who have not, nor will have an incident with a gun need to be controlled is pure nonsense.
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Quote
Can't gun owners themselves come together and support common sense laws?
Get rid of handgun ownership since most firearm crimes are committed with handguns.
How about getting rid of street gangs since they are the ones causing most of the firearm violence? 

Hint for you dumbasses: it's not legal firearm owners to who are responsible for Chicago's 500+ homicides this year.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Airwolf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12160
  • Reputation: +912/-163
I say what we need is less gun control. Detroit,Chicago,New York and L.A. all have tighter gun laws then say here and their crime rates are huge compared to cities that have fewer restrictions.
MOLON LABE

"Someday, when all your civilization and science are likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with a sword."-- Conan the Barbarian

Clint Eastwood - Because God wanted Chuck Norris to have nightmares.

"I am not a Number,I am a free man"

"He's my hero, you don't put away your heros, you honor them!"

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Quote
newmember (38 posts)

I'm new but there seems to be a lot of firearm threads , to all gun owners on the site I want to state that I support your right to own firearms.
...
Get rid of handgun ownership since most firearm crimes are committed with handguns...

Actual stupid DUmmtard noob or really, really poor mole trying 'waaaayyyy too hard to sound like a true idiot, you decide.

 :lmao:
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline I_B_Perky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7532
  • Reputation: +721/-329
I say what we need is less gun control. Detroit,Chicago,New York and L.A. all have tighter gun laws then say here and their crime rates are huge compared to cities that have fewer restrictions.

Well Airwolf... they are all democrat shitholes. The only thing that would clean those places up is to cut off HUD, welfare, etc. Once the women quit spreading their legs, then the pavement apes will disappear within a generation.

I think that is the only solution.   :fuelfire: :fuelfire:
Living in the Dummies minds rent free since 2009!

Montani Semper Liberi

Offline Firekrakka

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 525
  • Reputation: +79/-26
I say what we need is less gun control. Detroit,Chicago,New York and L.A. all have tighter gun laws then say here and their crime rates are huge compared to cities that have fewer restrictions.

Bingo! I used to live in Kennesaw where gun ownership is the law. Very very little crime there.


Getting older is mandatory
Growing up is optional

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Quote
Can't gun owners themselves come together and support common sense laws?
Get rid of handgun ownership since most firearm crimes are committed with handguns.



I thought mental retardation was due to chromosomal defect.

Bingo! I used to live in Kennesaw where gun ownership is the law. Very very little crime there.

Have the same law here (not enforced) since '82.  Not one gun crime since.

Not one.
« Last Edit: April 22, 2013, 01:00:20 AM by 98ZJUSMC »
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline Firekrakka

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 525
  • Reputation: +79/-26

Getting older is mandatory
Growing up is optional

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
Quote
I want to state that I support your right to own firearms.


Um, no you don't.

Quote
Can't gun owners themselves come together and support common sense laws?


If there were any, maybe.  Or maybe if the government actually, you know, ENFORCED the 20,000 laws already on the books.

Quote
Get rid of handgun ownership since most firearm crimes are committed with handguns.


Yeah, good luck with that.  So much for supporting my right to own a firearm.

Quote
If a person wanted to own a handgun there could be state owned ranges where the gun would have to be kept.


Guess that whole Second Amendment and Fourth Amendment don't mean much to you, do they?  And if some bad guy came a-knockin at 2 am, how would I obtain said weapon to defend myself?

Quote
Limit ownership of rifles that fire one bullet at a time , each time to fire a bullet you would have to pull
the handle back .


Newsflash, dipshit, I don't know of ANY weapon that fires more than one bullet at a time.  Last time I checked, there isn't a gun that has 389 bullets in the chamber.


Quote
This way people could still hunt or target shoot and it wouldn't restrict their hobby.

Newsflash again--read the Second Amendment.  Hunting?  Hobby?  Yeah, not so much.

Quote
Does this sound too draconian to the gun owners here?

Nah...matter of fact, let's make you register your computer, keep it at a government computer storage, and make it so you can't post more than one letter at a time without rebooting after every keystroke.  That oughta be fair, since the First Amendment never discussed computers or the Internet when they wrote it up, right?

“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford