I want to state that I support your right to own firearms.
Um, no you don't.
Can't gun owners themselves come together and support common sense laws?
If there were any, maybe. Or maybe if the government actually, you know, ENFORCED the 20,000 laws already on the books.
Get rid of handgun ownership since most firearm crimes are committed with handguns.
Yeah, good luck with that. So much for supporting my right to own a firearm.
If a person wanted to own a handgun there could be state owned ranges where the gun would have to be kept.
Guess that whole Second Amendment and Fourth Amendment don't mean much to you, do they? And if some bad guy came a-knockin at 2 am, how would I obtain said weapon to defend myself?
Limit ownership of rifles that fire one bullet at a time , each time to fire a bullet you would have to pull
the handle back .
Newsflash, dipshit, I don't know of ANY weapon that fires more than one bullet at a time. Last time I checked, there isn't a gun that has 389 bullets in the chamber.
This way people could still hunt or target shoot and it wouldn't restrict their hobby.
Newsflash again--read the Second Amendment. Hunting? Hobby? Yeah, not so much.
Does this sound too draconian to the gun owners here?
Nah...matter of fact, let's make you register your computer, keep it at a government computer storage, and make it so you can't post more than one letter at a time without rebooting after every keystroke. That oughta be fair, since the First Amendment never discussed computers or the Internet when they wrote it up, right?