Chick Fil A was told they were not going to be allowed to open restaurants in large cities by the mayors of those cities. It had nothing to do with health coverage and birth control.
Not that it matters much toward the OP, but this isn't the whole story. The CEO made what some would call an inflammatory statement about gay marriage, which caused all kinds of crap. Then yes, the political leadership of San Fransicko then Rahm in Chicago made statements of nonsupport for Chik Fil A's position. Whatevs.
The point is, I said this was a Chik-Fil-A
type of situation. And I drew my analogy. You can pick nits if you like, but it changes nothing.
Chick Fil A's situation was a clear violation of the First Amendment.
And, by reference, you seem to infer that Hobby Lobby's situation is nothing like Chik Fil A's. Maybe in a legal sense, but I still think there is a parallel. Again, whatevah.
The same insurance companies that helped write Obamacare, already offered birth control to policy holders. Until Obamacare goes away, these same issues with coverage for contraceptives will not go away.
Obamacare going away?
Don't hold your breath. We're stuck with that POS legislation forever. By the time Barry leaves office, the systems will have been changed, the lawyers will have created their niches, and legislators have once again created an entire bureaucracy that will be with us forevermore.
We both know Hobby Lobby is not going to close. They make too much money. They will just make everyone part time like every other place is doing so they don't have to pay benefits. 
I have a feeling each retail location only has a few full time employees in the first place.
I suspect you're right about that. Sorta like the Dollar General stores. As to them making scads of money, I guess that explains why I spent $120 on a picture frame - custom-made, of course, but jeezus....
