DUmmies dream of using drones & AC130s to kill gun owners

[marv]

Although, there is this....http://www.duffelblog.com/2013/01/military-drawing-up-plans-for-nation-wide-gun-confiscations/

Hmmm, the only USAF General James M. Scott that I'm aware of was played by Burt Lancaster in "Seven Days in May" in 1964..........entertaining movie, though.

[Airwolf]

The people that hate the military the most want the same military to come and take us out when we resist the overt attempts to circumvent the 2nd Amendment. They really do live in some kind of delusional state . Sorry Dumb Ass but the military doesn't swear fealty to the Prezzy or the Congress. And as was said before not all of the military would join in on your orgasmic funfest. so guess where those weapons are going to be aimed at if that order goes down the line?

[Karin]

Response to cherokeeprogressive (Reply #11)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 11:27 PM
Hugabear (9,512 posts)
61. You seem pretty sure that American soldiers would not take up arms against fellow Americans

I guess that memo didn't get around back in 1861.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Response to Hugabear (Reply #61)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 11:43 PM
 cherokeeprogressive (13,971 posts)
62. A couple of things: First off, 1861 was over 150 years ago.

Second, no matter how hard some in the anti-RKBA camp taunt, insult, or offend (think Mopar and the one who calls himself bong), no wedge can be driven in between gun owners/non that is as big as that between North/South/Industrial/Agrarian was in the 1800s, and that's not even mentioning slavery.

Last, I'd guess a majority of today's Servicemembers, Officers AND Enlisted, are RKBA supporters. So look for a huge breakdown in the chain of command. I honestly think you'd see them shooting at each other over orders most would consider unlawful before you'd see them shooting at civilians, or dropping bombs in American neighborhoods from A-10s, or strafing Senior Centers with AC-130s.

There something a little chilling about this post:

Response to R_Flagg_77 (Reply #29)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 07:45 PM
 Fresh_Start (7,105 posts)
33. I don't think there will be any insurgency

most gun owners are not on the side of the fools who want no gun control.
We'll be helping the government turning in the mentally unbalanced who are threatening the stability of our society.
 

I'll start!  Hello, DHS?  I know of a group of extremely mentally unbalanced people, all gathered together at one site.  Can you go round them up for me?  It's democraticunderground dot com.  Yes, you can't miss it. 

Response to R_Flagg_77 (Reply #26)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 09:07 PM
NickB79 (8,825 posts)
58. One pissed, RW nuclear technician at a power plant

And it's Fukushima in the US   

[delilahmused]

It's stunningly scary that there are members there who actually believe the military would violate their oath to protect the Constitution and turn on their own families to do the bidding of the boy king and his pet court jester trying for such a power grab.

Cindie

[NHSparky]

Response to R_Flagg_77 (Reply #26)
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 09:07 PM
NickB79 (8,825 posts)
58. One pissed, RW nuclear technician at a power plant

And it's Fukushima in the US   

Nick, being a right-winger (by your standards) who works at a nuclear power plant, let me give you a nickel's worth of free advice.

You're a ****ing dipshit sister-****ing, mouth-breathing, booger-eating, full-ri-tard mo-ron.  Remove yourself from the gene pool as quickly as possible.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

It's stunningly scary that there are members there who actually believe the military would violate their oath to protect the Constitution and turn on their own families to do the bidding of the boy king and his pet court jester trying for such a power grab.

Cindie

They're also the same ones who burn American flags and call service members war criminals who deserve to be killed by jihadists.

Yeah, that's who we'll side with.

[Rebel]

Hugabear (9,512 posts)
63. The military has a duty to protect against enemies - foreign and DOMESTIC

View profile
If a group of gun nuts or militia types decides they want to start killing government officials or other Americans, then they've crossed the line from being just gun nuts and would then be considered terrorists.

Yeah? So....what's the over/under on them removing the politicians attacking the U.S. Constitution right now, like Obama?


BTW, you Communist prick, I agree. I think you need to be rounded up, like yesterday. Communism is anathema to freedom and it's very existence in this country is a security threat.

[Vagabond]

Hugabear (9,512 posts)
63. The military has a duty to protect against enemies - foreign and DOMESTIC

View profile
If a group of gun nuts or militia types decides they want to start killing government officials or other Americans, then they've crossed the line from being just gun nuts and would then be considered terrorists.

You're deliberately forgetting the rest of that oath aren't you, mouthbreather.  The oath is to protect the CONSTITUTION against all enemies foreign and domestic, not Barrack Obama and his fellow traveler's enemies.

[Skul]

You're deliberately forgetting the rest of that oath aren't you, mouthbreather.  The oath is to protect the CONSTITUTION against all enemies foreign and domestic, not Barrack Obama and his fellow traveler's enemies.

I never did see an expiration date on that oath, either.

[Airwolf]

I never did see an expiration date on that oath, either.

Nether did I. In fact it is possible that should an armed civil war like the Dummies want take place the Government would or could end up adding to the numbers of pro gun troops to the ranks. Then what are you going to do while the US fights the Muslim terrorist and the homeland is defended by us?

[BlueStateSaint]

Nether did I.

Same here.

[wasp69]

Hugabear (9,512 posts)
63. The military has a duty to protect against enemies - foreign and DOMESTIC

We swore an oath to protect the Constitution from all enemies, both foreign and domestic.  You want the Constitution mangled into something unrecognizable without going through the trouble of amending it.  My oath doesn't grant you my protection, DUmmie, it makes you my enemy.

You should think a little more before you try to post, retard.

[dandi]

Leave it to the DUmbasses to think small.

When it reaches the point that conservatives feel the need to revolt, it will be nationwide and most of the military will be on our side for obvious reasons. It won't just be Earl and Billy Bob.

OTOH, a DUmmy revolution consists of two aging stoners holding misspelled signs in front of a Chik-fil-A.

[Ptarmigan]

That would require them getting off of their asses, ptarmy...

True, however I do not want to underestimate them.

[Big Dog]

I never did see an expiration date on that oath, either.

Hooah.