Trumad is tru-stupid.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021998466Star Member trumad (33,301 posts)
View profile
I'm 55 years old and have never owned a gun in my life.
Last edited Sun Dec 16, 2012, 09:35 AM USA/ET - Edit history (1)
Have I shot one-- sure---I was in the Airborne Infantry.
I've shot pretty much every weapon imaginable---all the way up to a 50mm machine gun. But again---that was in the Military.
But in civilian life... never had a reason to own one.
Personal protection? From what, the off chance someone breaks in my house? Well, it hasn't happened in 55 years.
A hobby? Perhaps... but once you've shot a 50mm, a handgun is quite boring.
I know you meant a .50 cal but you would think having shooting one you would remember that.
Also, just because no one broke into your house, it does not mean no one ever had their house broken into.
I'd love to see some statistics on how many people have used a gun and saved themselves from an intruder or bad guy.
Funny but I don't see too many stories of that happening.
The NRA publishes stories that deal with that but the stories do not reach mass market because it does not reinforce the narrative that guns are evil.
llmart (2,974 posts)
5. The sane voice of a real man.....
View profile
Thank you for that. I could never understand these people who say they are "protecting their property". What? It's worth killing someone over some crap you bought at a store?
I'm an avowed minimalist and there's nothing in my small condo that I can't live without. I don't need a gun, a security system, an attack dog (my dog would wag her tail and show you the way to the cupboard where the dog treats are kept) because I refuse to live every waking moment I have left (I'm an older woman) in fear of what MIGHT happen to me.
I was married to someone like that - couldn't go anywhere, not even up to the corner ice cream stand without strapping on his gun. He lived in fear of everything and he's suffered in more ways than one because of that fear, but you could never get him to see it. It's why I'm no longer with him. He was also a bully and a coward and if a real man confronted him he'd quiver in his shoes.
Protecting their property does not just mean physical items but maintaining the security of the home and the people inside from people who intead to do them harm.
This is an exchange between ProgressiveProfessor and Sarah Ibuprofen
ProgressiveProfessor (19,377 posts)
43. Not everything is a home invasion
View profile
- Events happen outside the home
- Some people don't call the police since they do not trust them (funny how that works)
- That a civilian weapon as used but not fired has not historically been tracked.
It really is a critical metric but there is no way to track it.
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #43)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 11:42 AM
Sarah Ibarruri (18,488 posts)
53. Yeah? I've never had a thing happen to me, and I'm a woman, and I carry no gun. Further...
View profile
I don't know anyone, male or female, that has had something happen to them outside the home.
I have heard of drive-by shootings in bad neighborhoods, and how are you going to defend yourself when a car drives by and shoots you? How fast can you pull out your gun and defend yourself when you're already on the ground, bleeding to death?
What's more, drive-by shootings and other such things we have courtesy of people who have a gun fetish, and insist that guns of all kinds should be freely sold. This country has more guns than people. Ridiculous. Absurd. DANGEROUS!
Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Reply #53)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 02:10 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (19,377 posts)
83. Then you must not have any GLBT friends who have been bashed, harassed, or threatened
View profile
which means you may not have any GLBT friends
Gun culture idiots don't do drivebys, that is the thug culture idiots. They are markedly different.
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #83)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 07:28 PM
Sarah Ibarruri (18,488 posts)
92. Oh, no doubt about gun nuts shooting GLBT folks, just as they shoot kids
View profile
I agree with you. GLBT folks run the same risk of getting shot by gun nuts as anyone else in this country. What's your issue?
Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Reply #92)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:21 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (19,377 posts)
93. GLBTs are at the same risk for being assaulted as the rest of us?
View profile
In what fantasy land do you live in? Certainly not the USA
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #93)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:24 PM
Sarah Ibarruri (18,488 posts)
94. So they get shot more? And you're in favor of guns????? You're nuts nt
Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Reply #94)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 08:36 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (19,377 posts)
95. I am in favor of effective self defense for those who need it
View profile
And far and way the most effective self defense weapon is a handgun.
I teach firearms mostly to GLBTs and women for that reason. They are often reluctant gun owners but have come to the realization that until things change, they have little choice. The police cannot be there in real time, and are sometimes part of the problem. These are not people in bad neighborhoods participating in questionable activities. Sometimes it follows them home. T*s are being slaughtered in some cities and NOTHING IS BEING DONE. These are not gun nuts. They will probably never by any kind of long gun, AR, AK, or otherwise. They will disarm when the threat passes.
Maybe you can be the one standing over them telling them that it was better they get their brains bashed in or got tortured and shot rather that own an evil pistol. I however, will continue to help them until the threat passes. It seems the progressive thing to do.
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #95)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 09:04 PM
Sarah Ibarruri (18,488 posts)
96. Oh I see. So you're in favor of those shooting gays being able to keep their guns? Demented. nt
Response to Sarah Ibarruri (Reply #96)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 09:28 PM
ProgressiveProfessor (19,377 posts)
98. No, I am in favor of people having the tools to defend themselves against predators
View profile
My focus is on GLBTs being able to resist effectively since the cops are not going to be able to do a thing except write reports, assuming they care to show up.
Your constructive obtuseness is an obvious fail...
Response to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #98)
Mon Dec 17, 2012, 10:30 AM
Sarah Ibarruri (18,488 posts)
113. To defend themselves from the guns you are arguing to keep out there and available, right? nt
This last bit just makes me

salinen (7,166 posts)
25. If someone breaks into my house
View profile
I'd either run out the back, or, hide, or, assist them in taking what they want. I don't want to murder anyone, even a thief.
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to salinen (Reply #25)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 10:53 AM
Iggo (21,024 posts)
33. "I don't want to murder anyone, even a thief."
View profile
That's beautiful right there.
Reply to this post
Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink
Response to trumad (Original post)
Sun Dec 16, 2012, 10:17 AM
Star Member Comrade_McKenzie (1,686 posts)
26. Sometimes you have to put the lives of others before what you like to do
View profile
Decent human beings will lay down their guns after this.
Again, they all assume the only reason people will enter their home is for property. How often has a property crime turned into something much worse?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wichita_MassacreDUmmies, **** you for trying to impose your selfish, short-sighted and delusional views of disarmament on the rest us.
