http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251114760Understanding that primitives don't usually speak about things that might hinder the Ones chances for re-election I was surprised this is being discussed.
Of course it's for all the wrong reasons and, as usual, they lie.
TroyD (1,659 posts)
Did Lockheed Martin Just Win Virginia for Obama?
By John Hudson | The Atlantic Wire – 14 hrs ago
It's difficult to understate the importance of Lockheed Martin's latest announcement on the race for the White House: the defense contractor said on Monday it will not be issuing employee layoff notices to 123,000 workers on Nov. 2—just four days before the presidential election. Amidst all of the super PACs and campaign ads, the threat of telling a sizable chunk of voters in key areas of the country that they could lose their jobs if the election didn't go Lockheed's way was one of the most potent examples of corporate electioneering. But the layoff threat was largely unreported outside of Beltway trade publications. Here's why today's announcement matters:
SNIP
In one word: Sequestration, the Congress-approved plan to strip some $500 billion in defense cuts over the next ten years. In June, Lockheed said it would have to issue layoff notices to workers under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act due to impending Pentagon budget cuts. Lockheed wanted assurances from the government that its contracts wouldn't be affected by sequestration.
SNIP
Do you know where many of Lockheed Martin's employees reside? Virginia, one of the all-important swing states of this election. It's a historically Republican state. In fact, before Obama's 2008 election, had won the state since Lyndon Johnson's 1964 bid. And pretty much all electoral map prognosticators say that if Obama wins both Virginia and Ohio this year, Mitt Romney has practically no chance of winning the presidential race. That's why if one of the biggest employers in the state were to issue layoff notices days ahead of the election, it could be devastating for President Obama.
SNIP
On Friday, the Pentagon issued guidance that promised two important things. "The guidance said the Pentagon did not anticipate killing any contracts on Jan. 2, the day automatic spending cuts are set to begin hitting defense spending," reports "The guidance also said the federal government would cover severance costs that are mandated under a federal layoff notices law." Voila! The next business day, Lockheed Martin announces it will no longer be issuing layoff notices.
http://news.yahoo.com/did-lockheed-martin-just-win-virginia-obama-183231738.html;_ylt=A2KJ3Ca_d2pQyGwA_UrQtDMD
So, the Administration has successfully pressured Lockheed Martin into breaking the WARN Act, put differently it means that Lockheed Martin is breaking the law at the behest of the administration for political reasons and taxpayers will be on the hook to pay damages awarded when they get sued and to pay for legal fees incurred.
So, in the primatives way of thinking it's a net gain.
pitbullgirl1965 (31 posts)
1. So what you're saying
Response to pitbullgirl1965 (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:38 AM
is that Lockhead Martin workers will see they are being manipulated and this will make them vote for President Obama? I'm confused. If so, I doubt it. Fools vote against their own interests all the time, and will vote against President Obama because he's a Marxist, Socialist, Nazi black man. They're idiots. That said: I don't give a rats behind about Lockheed, General Dynamics, or any of these defense contractors. It's time to disassemble the Military Industrial Complex.
TroyD (1,659 posts)
2. I basically agree with you (the title is not my own)
Response to pitbullgirl1965 (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:38 AM
I just copied the title from the article at the link to reproduce it accurately.
It's simply the opinion of this author and some others that the fact there will now be fewer defense cuts in Virginia than originally anticipated could be beneficial to Obama.
RichGirl (3,216 posts)
4. You assume we are all political.
Response to pitbullgirl1965 (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 07:13 AM
When someone has a family to feed and a mortgage to pay, their priority is getting a pay check each week. Yes, I think if being manipulated means they keep their jobs they'll be happy for it and probably vote for Obama for making it happen.
TroyD (1,659 posts)
5. The military-industrial complex is a danger, though
Response to RichGirl (Reply #4)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 07:20 AM
<Link to some video about Ike warrning about the MIC>
DCBob (13,600 posts)
6. If thousands of workers think they are going to be laid off in a few months..
Response to pitbullgirl1965 (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 07:21 AM
they will blame the President.. simple as that.
Tom Rinaldo (14,305 posts)
7. I think you are overthinking this
Response to pitbullgirl1965 (Reply #1)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 09:25 AM
The literal moment when a worker receives an actual pink slip is like a blow to the gut. Until then it doesn't feel 't completely real that their job is ending. 125,000 Virginians of voting age were "scheduled" to receive pink slips 4 days before the election, now they won't. Everything else is analysis and spin is an election season awash with it anyway.
DCBob (13,600 posts)
3. I wonder if the other defense contractors will do the same.
Response to TroyD (Original post)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 07:04 AM
Yes, this is big news and could impact VA race as well as other states that have large employmnet in the defense industry.
So to sum up, it's all about the light worker...screw the employees. And a pResident that is all about ignoring a law if it dosn't benefit him or his chances at getting re-elected and the primitives are on board with all that.