Send Us Hatemail ! mailbag@conservativecave.com
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Panasonic (487 posts)CU forecasters predict a Romney presidencyhttp://www.9news.com/news/article/284598/339/CU-forecasters-predict-a-Romney-presidencyDENVER (AP) - Two University of Colorado professors have devised a model to predict who will win the presidential election under current economic circumstances.The victor, they say, will be Republican Mitt Romney.The model uses economic indicators from all 50 states to predict the race's outcome. The forecast calls for Romney to win 320 electoral votes out of 538.---Cracksmokers - all of them.The forecasters keep forgetting the key factors - Republican obstructionism. All Republican ideologies should be completely rejected.It's actually favoring Obama - all swing states will pick him, and reject Rmoney and Rayn outright.
LondonReign2 (1,301 posts)1. SureIf this election was based on nothing but economic factors, then sure, they might be correct. Fortunately there is a lot more than goes into it.Like, you know, who actually CAUSED the current set of economic factors.
Atman (24,433 posts)2. They must have factored in states with electronic voting machines.That is the only way I can see this Neanderthal getting elected.
russspeakeasy (4,547 posts)4. Watch it Atman. I know some Neanderthal's and they are pretty pissed at you right now.
southernyankeebelle (7,053 posts)3. With voter suppression is the only way I see him winning. I just can't believe people will vote Mittens in to repeat the Bush administration.
ProfessorGAC (23,687 posts)5. I Bet Dollars To Donuts This Model Wouldn't Pass A Peer ReviewIt sounds like they fashioned a model to fit the results from past elections and then claim they can extrapolate forward. Rule of thumb in statistics: One can always safely interpolate, but should always be wary of extrapolation.The other piece they left out, glaringly, is the campaigning ability of each candidate and the charisma factor.In politics, leaving those two things out practically make any such prediction valueless.GAC
flamingdem (16,014 posts)7. breaking news: Witch doctors in gazimbia predict a Romney winwhatevuh!
IIRC, this model correctly predicted the last several races. Doesn't mean it can't be wrong, but they've got a higher batting average than the DUmmies.
electronic voting machines.
No wonder I am stuck with Harry Reid in Nevada.
A presidential election prediction model developed by two University of Colorado professors points to a big win for GOP presidential contender Mitt Romney in November.The model, the only of its kind to use more than one state-level economic indicator, has correctly predicted the winner of every presidential election since 1980.It predicts Romney winning the electoral college by a 320-218 margin and winning 52.9 percent of the popular vote when only the two major parties’ candidates are considered, the Associated Press reported Thursday.Romney, it concluded, will win every state currently considered by pollsters to be a swing state, including Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Florida, Virginia, Colorado, New Hampshire and North Carolina.
"The nation that couldn’t be conquered by foreign enemies has been conquered by its elected officials" odawg Free Republic in reference to the GOP Elites who are no difference than the Democrats
I will reserve judgment until Truth-is-All runs his Monte Carlo simulations. Hell, TIA can prove that Mondale actually won in 1984.
I think I saw that mass of fecal matter. Remind me, with a link . . .
http://dailycaller.com/2012/08/23/university-of-colorado-prediction-model-points-to-big-romney-win 08/23/2012 University of Colorado prediction model points to big Romney win<snippet>
That is about what I would say, although I would add Michigan and Nevada to it also. They are a toss up of course, but It wouldn't surprise me if Romney both of those states as well. What would be really pants is if obama loses Illinois.
I saw a model last week--I wish I could remember where--that had Nevada, Oregon, New Mexico, Iowa, and Michigan all red, in addition to the ones in the CU model.That would be epic.
In 2008, Obama won Iowa, Maine, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Vermont by 200,000 votes or less.I don't know what percentage of likely voters that is for each state, but it doesn't sound like a lot to me.
Just a suspicion...but Obumbler wouldn't be wasting time in such a small electoral state such as Iowa if their internal polls showed they weren't in trouble. He's been here a ton lately, as have Romney & Ryan.
Minnesota flip to red?Nah, the smurfs of Minniecrapolis out-number regular people working for a living.