What is it with the moonbat penchant for silencing opposing points of view through financial extortion, legislation or physical force? With very few exceptions would I refuse to patronize a business because of the owners or other customers' beliefs, assuming I even knew them, which I likely wouldn't. It would have to be something very egregious and even then it wouldn't be for the express purpose of hurting them financially but because I just wouldn't want to keep personal company with them. I certainly wouldn't feel compelled to make an ostentatious showing of what I was doing.
Do they really think they're changing anyone's mind even if they do succeed in shutting down expressions of thought? It just seems childish to me.