Welcome to The Conservative CaveĀ©!Join in the discussion! Click HERE to register.
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
After all, we all have intellectual property rights in what we have written, but the ideas expressed in our writing aren't subject to copyright. In future, somebody might remember the idea of this thread, find a different way to express it in words, and post it on a message board about Objectivism. Perhaps you wouldn't want that to happen, but it might happen nevertheless.
I don't want anybody to post with the expectation of being banned, or to post without being interested in what is posted. After all, we all have intellectual property rights in what we have written, but the ideas expressed in our writing aren't subject to copyright. In future, somebody might remember the idea of this thread, find a different way to express it in words, and post in on a message board about Objectivism. Perhaps you wouldn't want that to happen, but it might happen nevertheless.
I have it on good authority that Socrates, not long before he uttered those immortal words, "I drank WHAT!?!" ordered a double Boston cream pie. With cool whip.
I was hoping that somebody might post my questions on some message board(s) about Objectivism. I was hoping to see how Objectivists respond on their message board(s). I wasn't hoping to have a philosophy discussion here.
Probie,Post your own questions on other boards. We are not your bitches.
I don't post on boards that have banned me.
BTW, you posted this in the wrong forum. Your new name shall be...
I don't want anybody to post with the expectation of being banned, or to post without being interested in what is posted. After all, we all have intellectual property rights in what we have written, but the ideas expressed in our writing aren't subject to copyright. In future, somebody might remember the idea of this thread, find a different way to express it in words, and post it on a message board about Objectivism. Perhaps you wouldn't want that to happen, but it might happen nevertheless.
I must say, I don't understand Boojatta, nor do I want to.
It seems to operate on a number of false assumptions about us.When it's assumptions are shown to be false it does not correct its assumptions, it assumes we are at fault for not accepting its assumptions.I feel like I'm watching one of my yard birds chasing hither and yon in pursuit of some indiscernible stimuli.
So lemme get this straight. Someone here is supposed to post your existentialist sh!t on DU cause you got yourself banned?Boojatta you are pathetic. No pie for you. But Big Dog get an extra piece.
You failed to incite any interest in your question or its underlying philosophy. No one here is invested in your position, nor interested in third party opinions of it.I think you would have figured that out by now.
Do you have some special talent for determining how many views are from people who posted replies and how many views are from lurkers? I have reached no conclusion about the opinions, interests, or attitudes of people who lurked without posting. This reminds me of a couple of DU threads that illustrate the workings of the DU noise machine and the DU outrage machine. Perhaps I'll post those trips down memory lane in the DUmpster forum here at CC.
Fruit Pizza
What is fruit pizza?
There's as many kinds as you like. Here's one from Paula Deen.