Author Topic: Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive  (Read 1548 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive
« on: February 24, 2012, 11:00:49 AM »
Quote
In child pornography trial, court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive

In an appeal of a 2010 child pornography investigation, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that individuals may invoke their Fifth Amendment protection from self-incrimination when refusing to decrypt hard drives that have been confiscated by police.

The implication of the court’s decision may affect any number of federal investigations against child pornography, terrorism, or any other case involving the use of a computer. The decision may also affect US citizens returning from overseas travel where they are often demanded to allow Homeland Security agents to examine their hard drives.
Global Post

I agree with the court's decision, but I really hope the prosecutors have enough evidence to put this sicko away.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline obumazombie

  • Siege engine to lib fortresses
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 21814
  • Reputation: +1661/-578
  • Last of the great minorities
Re: Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2012, 11:50:25 AM »
If it can be shown that the hard drive in question was connected to any wired or wireless data transfer device the 5th amendment would not apply. There is plenty of precedent to uphold such a ruling.
There were only two options for gender. At last count there are at least 12, according to libs. By that standard, I'm a male lesbian.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2012, 11:58:04 AM »
If it can be shown that the hard drive in question was connected to any wired or wireless data transfer device the 5th amendment would not apply. There is plenty of precedent to uphold such a ruling.
You have one in mind?  I'd like to see it.
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2012, 12:02:10 PM »
You have one in mind?  I'd like to see it.

5th Amendment. The right to not self-incriminate. It's up to the prosecution to form the case. The criminal has no responsibility to help them.
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2012, 12:12:13 PM »
5th Amendment. The right to not self-incriminate. It's up to the prosecution to form the case. The criminal has no responsibility to help them.
I was referring to this assertion...
If it can be shown that the hard drive in question was connected to any wired or wireless data transfer device the 5th amendment would not apply.

 that would magically negate any 5th amendment protection simply by connecting the drive to "any wired or wireless data transfer device".

I'd love to see something to support the claim.
« Last Edit: February 24, 2012, 09:35:29 PM by chris_ »
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Rebel

  • MAGA
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16934
  • Reputation: +1384/-215
Re: Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2012, 12:13:07 PM »
I was reffering to this assertion that would magically negate any 5th amendment protection simply by connecting the drive to "any wired or wireless data transfer device".

Ah, gotcha. I only read what you bolded and assumed.  :-)
NAMBLA is a left-wing organization.

Quote
There's a reason why patriotism is considered a conservative value. Watch a Tea Party rally and you'll see people proudly raising the American flag and showing pride in U.S. heroes such as Thomas Jefferson. Watch an OWS rally and you'll see people burning the American flag while showing pride in communist heroes such as Che Guevera. --Bob, from some news site

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +802/-833
Re: Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2012, 12:16:19 PM »
If it can be shown that the hard drive in question was connected to any wired or wireless data transfer device the 5th amendment would not apply. There is plenty of precedent to uphold such a ruling.

There is no evidence presently.  The prosecution is on a fishing expedition so the 5th of course would apply.   

Offline compaqxp

  • The Canadian
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1449
  • Reputation: +743/-808
Re: Court allows suspect to refuse to decrypt hard drive
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2012, 11:16:33 AM »
I agree with the courts decision as I'm sure many do.

Quote
The decision may also affect US citizens returning from overseas travel where they are often demanded to allow Homeland Security agents to examine their hard drives.

Please tell me that's not serious.