Jeezus, it's such a screwed up configuration.
Newt is tainted. And I don't like his economic plan because it offers a "choice." That smacks to me of failing to make a decision. And Michelle Malkin blasted Newt for lately hiding behind the NY Slimes, a liberal rag if there ever was one.
http://michellemalkin.com/2012/01/09/the-abysmal-incompetence-of-the-non-romneys/Santorum's economic plan actually TRIPLES the tax credit for children. Sorry, but that kinda shit doesn't square with me. It's tantamount to saying, "You're special because you have spawned children." I have three kids, but I never took a tax credit for them. I firmly believe those who do take tax credits for kids accept government subsidies and that ain't gonna happen in my home as long as I'm breathing. Plus, I'm just not the social conservative that he is, although I applaud his stance on the issues and understand 100% what he's saying.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203471004577140980959763486.html?mod=googlenews_wsjHuntsman's plan, on paper, sounds better but he's just another Utah RINO. No substance, no background, no hope of ever getting any.
Rick Perry's flat tax of 20% isn't as aggressive as Newt's 15% and he's another one who can't make up his mind in making that flat tax an "option". So much for simplifying the tax code, Rick. You and Newt oughta be a couple.

Rick would absolutely falter in a debate with Lord Zero, as well. I just don't think he's capable of beating Barry, and that's what we need. And I just can't get past the idea that Perry's economic plan was something that he and his team threw together in direct response to Cain's 9-9-9 plan. This source doesn't think very kindly of it either:
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/economy/rick-perryRomney, as we all know, is a 100% white version of Barry.
Dr. Nutz - no need in even going there.
So shit. I'm gonna have to throw my lot in with Newt. He's a scoundrel and a Washington insider, but he's the only one of the bunch that's worth half a damn.