Hi,
Sent the following to the local paper today. Be interesting to see if they print it.
regards,
5412
Dear Editor,
Two sets of standards
As I sat there at lunch today watching my grandson playing with the toy from his McDonalds Happy Meal a thought occurred to me. There is a certain segment of the liberal population that wants to change the sugar and fat content of those foods and eliminate the toy he was enjoying all together.
As a liberal friend explained to me sometime back, “Our society is too fat. A certain segment of the population has an addiction to fat and sugary foods and the government needs to pass laws to protect them from that addiction.â€
Now it would seem to me that since World War II our “congressional leaders†seem to have a spending addiction, having spent some $15 trillion or more money than they have taken in, with no end in sight. It also seems to me that it is those same liberals who are opposed to a balanced budget amendment to the constitution. Wouldn’t a balanced budget amendment be the same thing, passing a law to protect them, and us the taxpayers from their spending addiction?
Sounds to me like two sets of standards, one for our “congressional leaders†and one they want to impose on others. I suggest the congress of this country spend their time on solving some real problems. Until they are willing to pass a balanced budget amendment to deal with their spending addiction, they should leave my grandson and his Happy Meal alone.
Best regards,