I admit that I don't have it.
So, you were talking out of your ass, got it, that's pretty much what I figured.
I also am not naive enough to think that he would suddenly stop taking bribes. He just quit doing it on the house floor.
Yet, you can't prove that he is being bribed to tank the debt ceiling vote. We already have one group in this country that relies on assumptions to guide them and it isn't the TEA Party.
Look, I am not a conspiracy guy.
Maybe you should consider it, you seem to have a good head start.
You can believe what you want.
I will believe what can be verified either through source documentation or my own personal experience, thank you. Anything else needs to be presented.
He went from Cut, cap and balance to a plan that has no cuts in it but raises the debt ceiling.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has released its analysis of the revised Budget Control Act of 2011 today, and CBO’s analysis confirms that the spending cuts are greater than the debt hike – affirming that the House GOP bill meets the critical test House Republicans have said they will insist upon for any bill to raise the nation’s debt ceiling. Specifically, the CBO analysis confirms the Republican plan will:
* Cut and cap spending by $917 billion over 10 years – that’s more than the $900 billion debt hike;
* Cut $22 billion in spending for FY2012 and hold spending below FY2010 levels until FY2016;
* Continue reducing discretionary spending each year compared to President Obama’s budget (by $96 billion in 2012, $118 billion in 2013, $115 billion in 2014, $117 billion in 2015, and so on); and
* Require Congress to draft proposals that produce reductions of at least $1.8 trillion that help protect programs like Medicare and Social Security from bankruptcy.
http://www.speaker.gov/blog/The proof is in front of your face. Boehner is a sell out.
No legislation has been ratified nor signed into law. As much as I may disagree with the Speaker, bless his cry-baby heart, I have to hand it to him for standing pretty damned tough. This legislation isn't everything at once but it's a damned good start. We didn't get here in one stroke of the pen, we won't get back with one.
Your opinion notwithstanding...
But your lack of effort to find out for yourself leads me to believe that you are a sheep to the republican party... I am tired of doing the research for you.
I asked you to back up your bullshit and you want to lecture me about lack of effort? Really?
You talk out of your ass more often than not, "unbiased", and get
schooled quite a bit around
here. Do you think you have earned any credibility?
I truly hope you stay conservative, but I also hope you get your head out of the sand.
Thank you so much for your concern, truly. I'll manage to carry on, somehow.
Lifetime politicians are bought, period.
The matter of "term limits" are best left to the people who hire and fire politicians (ie district voters). I am not now, nor will I ever be, in favor of putting the responsibility of legislating "term limits" in the hands of the very people that are being limited. That would be beyond stupid.
