The point is that Creationism/Intelligent Design is not science.
Who decided that? The Godless evolutionists?
Who determines what is science and what isn't? Religion has played a hand in science down through out the ages...who decied it should be removed and why?
No, the scientists over the last hundreds of years established what is and isn't science. Science has a core of how it goes about approaching data. The same approach is used for TToE as astronomy, chemistry, physics, geology, etc.
Religion established the desire for the search for Truth, no matter where that leads. It is because of the Enlightenment that the Scientific Method (only accepted by every single scientist in the last 400 years) was established. And there is no place for "and here a miracle occurred."
It is a belief.
So is Evolution.
No it isn't. It is a scientific discipline that stands astride physics, chemistry, geology, etc. And it is very much advanced from the Theory of Gravity and others.
Whereas the study of evolution is science.
It's an unproven theory.
[/quote]
As a friend, I really suggest you stop making a fool of yourself. A Scientific Theory is not a sanctified guess. There is not a hierarchy that goes Guess>Hypothesis>Theory>Fact. A Scientific Theory is a collective strucure which explains a large body of interrelated data. In this case, BILLIONS of data points. BILLIONS.
Ignorance is NOT a Conservative value. Willful Ignorance is especially not one.
I can't explain it any better then Freedumb did.
No you can't.
Amazing...you'll laugh at the people who buy hook line and sinker into the "science" of Man Made Global warming.
Yet you sound just like them where evolution is concerned. Another unproven "theory"
How do you square the two different views?
Because so-called "climatology" is an infant science. Rather than being driven by data and facts, it started with the conclusion and then tries to fit the data to fit that conclusion (which is NOT what TToE has done -- witness the number of changes over the years). If in 30 years, it can take the same data and go from Global Cooling to Global Warming, then its very mechanisms must be reviewed with great skepticism.
And AGW has multiple physical explanations and no fantastic ones. AGW may or may not be happening, if it is it may or may not be a result of human activity or (more likely) it is the planet doing what planets do (which, BTW requires it be billions of years old, not 6,000).
Again, what NON-fantastic alternate theories has anyone proposed to TToE? Answer: None.