Author Topic: Romney - Bachmann 2012?  (Read 25021 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #25 on: January 06, 2011, 01:43:40 PM »
Mitt and Max - twins separated at birth rendering?  You decide!

 :lmao:
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline cavegal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3015
  • Reputation: +105/-42
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #26 on: January 06, 2011, 01:54:19 PM »
Former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney will run for President in 2012 with the support of traditional fiscal conservatives (non tea party voters), foreign policy conservatives, Reagan conservatives, and some moderates. However, Romney is not popular with tea party conservatives or social conservatives. Picking Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) would be a smart political move for Romney. Romney is middle-aged, a male, and although he hails from the midwest, he was a new england governor and businessman. Bachmann is younger, from the midwest, and loved by tea party and social conservatives. My question to all of you is, would a Romney-Bachmann ticket be a good idea in your view?
What is a "traditional fiscal conservative?"  RINO.... no thank you.. Romney sucks


“Look, we’re led by a man that either is not tough, not smart, or he’s got something else in mind,”  Donald J.Trump. 6/13/16

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #27 on: January 06, 2011, 02:00:20 PM »
"traditional fiscal conservative" = Social liberal who wants a balanced budget, often by cutting defense which most of them think you can just go buy off the shelf if you ever have to fight a war.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline theconservative

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +1/-47
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #28 on: January 06, 2011, 03:55:49 PM »
^ What she said. ^

What is your "handle" sir"?

"theconservative"? Really??

Did your fingers slip on the keys when you meant to type "themoderate"?

Our maybe Im just confused by the term. I think thats what Charles Krauthammer and the NYTimes keeps telling me anyways ...

Romney cut spending without increasing taxes in Massachusetts, he increased funding for soldiers returning home, and he said no to illegal immigrants getting driver's licenses. Say what you want about his healthcare plan, but it did not violate the constitutional principle of state's rights, it did not increase taxes under his watch, and it did not cut medicare on seniors. I would not have pursued such a bill, it was not a good bill, but a 2009 poll showed 59% of residents in the bay state still support the healthcare legislation.

Offline theconservative

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +1/-47
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #29 on: January 06, 2011, 03:58:35 PM »
Palin - Bachmann 2012

The issue here is, you have two tea-party supported candidates who are also loved by social conservatives, but not foreign policy voters or traditional republicans.

Offline theconservative

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +1/-47
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #30 on: January 06, 2011, 04:02:44 PM »
What is a "traditional fiscal conservative?"  RINO.... no thank you.. Romney sucks

You bring up a great question. Some in the tea party want to eliminate social security and cut military spending, which traditional fiscal conservatives oppose.

Personally, I want to abolish the IRS, department of education, the department of interior, the department of agriculture, and I want to combine other departments. However, I do not want to cut a penny from the defense budget, and I'd love it if they just passed the privatization of social security.

Offline CactusCarlos

  • Pray, eat your vitamins, and one day you too could be a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4113
  • Reputation: +296/-100
  • If I agree with you, then we'll both be wrong.
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #31 on: January 06, 2011, 04:05:23 PM »
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."
  -- Norman Thomas, six-time Socialist Party presidential candidate and one of the founders of the ACLU


Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #32 on: January 06, 2011, 04:14:27 PM »
Some in the tea party want to eliminate social security and cut military spending, which traditional fiscal conservatives oppose.

I strongly disagree, and I would also add that Romney's health plan was clearly going to ultimately be unsustainable, and foreseeably so from its inception, he just knew he could bail long before it crashed so he wouldn't get the black mark for it.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline theconservative

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +1/-47
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #33 on: January 06, 2011, 05:15:33 PM »
I strongly disagree, and I would also add that Romney's health plan was clearly going to ultimately be unsustainable, and foreseeably so from its inception, he just knew he could bail long before it crashed so he wouldn't get the black mark for it.

1. Some libertarian members of the tea party do want to eliminate social security and cut military spending, look at the statements made by Rep. Ron Paul and others. Not all take this position, but some do.

2. When Romney left office, the state had a surplus and his healthcare plan was still affordable. The principle of Romeycare, which was that people had to buy insurance instead of having the government pay, was a good principle though it obviously was badly implemented. Mitt thought the state could afford the plan, and he was wrong. Bureaucrats often tell governors or presidents that things will cost less than what they end up costing, it happens all the time. I will not defend Mitt Romney on the individual mandates, but I will defend his right to pass the plan and I don't believe his plan should disqualify him from being president.

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2835/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #34 on: January 07, 2011, 08:44:38 AM »
1. Some libertarian members of the tea party do want to eliminate social security and cut military spending, look at the statements made by Rep. Ron Paul and others. Not all take this position, but some do.

2. When Romney left office, the state had a surplus and his healthcare plan was still affordable. The principle of Romeycare, which was that people had to buy insurance instead of having the government pay, was a good principle though it obviously was badly implemented. Mitt thought the state could afford the plan, and he was wrong. Bureaucrats often tell governors or presidents that things will cost less than what they end up costing, it happens all the time. I will not defend Mitt Romney on the individual mandates, but I will defend his right to pass the plan and I don't believe his plan should disqualify him from being president.

I'll go with you on point #2 from the standpoint that bureaucrats typically and traditionally underreport and underestimate long term costs - you'd think that executives would get a clue about that, but no, they don't.

But I'll flat out tell you that Romney prides himself on being a "numbers" man. He'll stand up and quote chapter and verse on small points relating to any particular policy or legislation and do so quite elegantly - it's clear he does a certain amount of homework.

So why, pray tell, did Romney fail so badly in both failing to predict the underestimates for cost and the ultimate unsustainability of RomneyCare if he's such a "numbers" guy?
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline debk

  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12473
  • Reputation: +467/-58
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #35 on: January 07, 2011, 10:01:11 AM »
I'll go with you on point #2 from the standpoint that bureaucrats typically and traditionally underreport and underestimate long term costs - you'd think that executives would get a clue about that, but no, they don't.

But I'll flat out tell you that Romney prides himself on being a "numbers" man. He'll stand up and quote chapter and verse on small points relating to any particular policy or legislation and do so quite elegantly - it's clear he does a certain amount of homework.

So why, pray tell, did Romney fail so badly in both failing to predict the underestimates for cost and the ultimate unsustainability of RomneyCare if he's such a "numbers" guy?

Maybe because he failed, he became a "numbers" guy after?  Was he like many, who relied on the research of others, then recited it chapter and verse his constituents,  only to end up looking foolish? Did he then decide that if he was going to recite C & V, then he needed to be doing his own homework, rather than to rely on the work of others?

I don't know the answers, or trying to be snarky.
Just hand over the chocolate...back away slowly...far away....and you won't get hurt....

Save the Earth... it's the only planet with chocolate.

"My therapist told me the way to achieve true inner peace is to finish what I start. So far I've finished two bags of M&M's and a chocolate cake. I feel better already." – Dave Barry

A balanced diet is chocolate in both hands.

Offline docstew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4741
  • Reputation: +282/-187
  • My Wife is awesome!
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #36 on: January 07, 2011, 11:26:59 AM »
Didn't we already try the RINO-Conservative woman ticket combo against 0bama?  Why do it again?

Offline CactusCarlos

  • Pray, eat your vitamins, and one day you too could be a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4113
  • Reputation: +296/-100
  • If I agree with you, then we'll both be wrong.
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #37 on: January 07, 2011, 11:53:30 AM »
The issue here is, you have two tea-party supported candidates who are also loved by social conservatives, but not foreign policy voters or traditional republicans.

What makes you think they won't be?
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism, but under the name of liberalism they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program until one day America will be a socialist nation without ever knowing how it happened."
  -- Norman Thomas, six-time Socialist Party presidential candidate and one of the founders of the ACLU


Offline delilahmused

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7384
  • Reputation: +1367/-80
  • Devil Mom
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #38 on: January 07, 2011, 12:08:59 PM »
Palin-West, Bachmann for AG

Cindie
"If God built me a ladder to heaven, I would climb it and elbow drop the world."
Mick Foley

"I am a very good shot. I have hunted for every kind of animal. But I would never kill an animal during mating season."
Hedy Lamarr

"I'm just like any modern woman trying to have it all. Loving husband, a family. It's just, I wish I had more time to seek out the dark forces and join their hellish crusade."
Morticia Addams

Offline true_blood

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6221
  • Reputation: +652/-817
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #39 on: January 07, 2011, 12:16:43 PM »
I like Bachmann. Scratch that Romney name.

Offline Lacarnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4154
  • Reputation: +316/-315
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #40 on: January 07, 2011, 01:00:30 PM »
Romney is A Yankee liberal who can not win. How the hell can he explain his vote for MASScare when it mirrors Obamacare. He is a social liberal and a flip flopper on abortion and who knows what his position is on gay marriage.

Online DefiantSix

  • Captain, IKS Defiant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18627
  • Reputation: +1985/-189
  • "Set Condition One throughout the ship."
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #41 on: January 07, 2011, 01:27:56 PM »
Didn't we already try the RINO-Conservative woman ticket combo against 0bama?  Why do it again?

+1.  :werd:
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker

"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers

"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus

Offline theconservative

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +1/-47
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #42 on: January 07, 2011, 02:03:04 PM »
I'll go with you on point #2 from the standpoint that bureaucrats typically and traditionally underreport and underestimate long term costs - you'd think that executives would get a clue about that, but no, they don't.

But I'll flat out tell you that Romney prides himself on being a "numbers" man. He'll stand up and quote chapter and verse on small points relating to any particular policy or legislation and do so quite elegantly - it's clear he does a certain amount of homework.

So why, pray tell, did Romney fail so badly in both failing to predict the underestimates for cost and the ultimate unsustainability of RomneyCare if he's such a "numbers" guy?

Romney cut spending in Massachusetts, a state that faced a $3 billion budget deficit. As a Governor, Romney did increase fees, local commercial taxes, and he also created an online sales tax. However, Romney also expanded a 2003 tax cut on investment, he created a New Market Tax Credit, and he stopped further tax increases. Furthermore, Romney saw the addition of 80,000 jobs during his time as governor. He held spending increases to 2.2%, when, according to the club for growth, spending should have seen a 3% increase during his time as governor given the population. His record as governor is very good in general, but outstanding considering the political climate he governed in.

Offline Lacarnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4154
  • Reputation: +316/-315
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #43 on: January 07, 2011, 03:36:37 PM »
Romney cut spending in Massachusetts, a state that faced a $3 billion budget deficit. As a Governor, Romney did increase fees, local commercial taxes, and he also created an online sales tax. However, Romney also expanded a 2003 tax cut on investment, he created a New Market Tax Credit, and he stopped further tax increases. Furthermore, Romney saw the addition of 80,000 jobs during his time as governor. He held spending increases to 2.2%, when, according to the club for growth, spending should have seen a 3% increase during his time as governor given the population. His record as governor is very good in general, but outstanding considering the political climate he governed in.

He is still a Yankee liberal who can not win. MA Health care dooms him along with his flip flop on abortion. He talks a good game but it comes out of both sides of his mouth. Kinda like Obama.

Offline theconservative

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +1/-47
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #44 on: January 07, 2011, 04:58:32 PM »
He is still a Yankee liberal who can not win. MA Health care dooms him along with his flip flop on abortion. He talks a good game but it comes out of both sides of his mouth. Kinda like Obama.

Mitt Romney is the best chance the GOP has in 2012. He is not a liberal, he is a conservative republican. Sorry to break this too you, but unlike in 2000, there is no one with a southern accent with a chance. Yes, Gingrich is from the south, but he does not come across as a southerner, perhaps because of his years in D.C. and I'm not sure if he lives in Georgia right now. I just don't believe in not voting for someone because of where they come from in the 48 main states.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2011, 05:05:02 PM »
Nobody here is smellin' what theconservative is cookin'.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline theconservative

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +1/-47
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2011, 05:07:28 PM »
Nobody here is smellin' what theconservative is cookin'.

I am open ears, tell me who I should be voting for in 2012.

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2011, 05:10:24 PM »
Many have made other suggestions to you, but Mitt is clearly the only one you like.  What would be the point?
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Lacarnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4154
  • Reputation: +316/-315
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2011, 05:21:24 PM »
Mitt Romney is the best chance the GOP has in 2012. He is not a liberal, he is a conservative republican. Sorry to break this too you, but unlike in 2000, there is no one with a southern accent with a chance. Yes, Gingrich is from the south, but he does not come across as a southerner, perhaps because of his years in D.C. and I'm not sure if he lives in Georgia right now. I just don't believe in not voting for someone because of where they come from in the 48 main states.

According to an 18 YEAR old know it all troll. You do not know shit boy cause you are still wet behind the ears. Sorry to break this to you but Romney is NO conservative, and if that is the best the Repubs have to offer, I will not vote along with many other Southerners. I don't care for Huck or Newt but I would vote for them over your boy who was once the Governor of the most LIBERAL state in the USA. In other words, you can not polish this turd and make him acceptable. 

Offline theconservative

  • Probationary (Probie)
  • Posts: 58
  • Reputation: +1/-47
Re: Romney - Bachmann 2012?
« Reply #49 on: January 07, 2011, 05:56:31 PM »
According to an 18 YEAR old know it all troll. You do not know shit boy cause you are still wet behind the ears. Sorry to break this to you but Romney is NO conservative, and if that is the best the Repubs have to offer, I will not vote along with many other Southerners. I don't care for Huck or Newt but I would vote for them over your boy who was once the Governor of the most LIBERAL state in the USA. In other words, you can not polish this turd and make him acceptable. 

I am sorry the main stream media has brainwashed you into believing everything you hear. Southerners vote for the GOP nominee, at least since '68. Also, I do like candidates like Huckabee, Pawlenty, Daniels etc. I will defend truth from fiction, fact from propaganda, and freedom from fear.