I was listening to a radio show with an Oklahoma senator, Inhofe? Anyway, he says this earmark thing isn't quite so simple. His example was the latest budget had some line items for some military items. One line item was changed from the original to something the military needs far worse, a certain number of fighter jets. Because they changed the budget, that line is now considered an earmark. If they have no earmark capability, they can only accept or deny the budget the president sends them, which makes the budget far more an executive branch decision, and takes it away from the legislative branch. It seems like the will need to be a distinction between this type of earmark and the earmark that squeals like a pig.