Author Topic: Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case  (Read 1459 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cavegal

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3015
  • Reputation: +105/-42
Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case
« on: September 28, 2010, 02:08:37 PM »
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE68R4JJ20100928?feedType=RSS&feedName=entertainmentNews&rpc=22&sp=true

Quote
It marked the second time the nation's highest court has agreed to consider the long-running legal battle involving the former topless dancer and Texas billionaire J. Howard Marshall


“Look, we’re led by a man that either is not tough, not smart, or he’s got something else in mind,”  Donald J.Trump. 6/13/16

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2835/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2010, 02:27:25 PM »
Oh, FFS.  :thatsright:
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline DefiantSix

  • Captain, IKS Defiant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18693
  • Reputation: +2002/-189
  • "Set Condition One throughout the ship."
Re: Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2010, 03:01:16 PM »
Oh, FFS.  :thatsright:

Thank-you.  I was searching for the right words to say what I thought of this, and the stupidity was overwhelming me. 
"Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here."
-- Capt. John Parker

"I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission"
-- Capt. Steve Rogers

"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem, government IS the problem."
-- Ronaldus Magnus

Offline Odin's Hand

  • is your new god!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Reputation: +366/-25
  • Quarters Champion
Re: Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2010, 03:25:15 PM »
Paging Dr. Frankenstein...
"Hell is full of good wishes and desires"~St. Bernhard of Clairvaux

"Brave men are found where brave men are honored."~Aristotle

"Generally speaking, the "Way of the Warrior" is resolute acceptance of death."~ Miyamoto Musashi

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2835/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case
« Reply #4 on: September 28, 2010, 03:27:31 PM »
Thank-you.  I was searching for the right words to say what I thought of this, and the stupidity was overwhelming me. 

Glad to oblige.

Now that the shock has worn off, WTF ARE THEY THINKING ?!?!?!?!?

I need some help in understanding this. I hope DAT weighs in. There's a lot I don't get.

Do the justices VOTE on which cases to review and which to shitcan? If not, who decides? Just what earthshaking worthy-of-the-SCOTUS legal basis is so fuggin' important?
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline vesta111

  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9712
  • Reputation: +493/-1154
Re: Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case
« Reply #5 on: September 28, 2010, 06:30:55 PM »
Glad to oblige.

Now that the shock has worn off, WTF ARE THEY THINKING ?!?!?!?!?

I need some help in understanding this. I hope DAT weighs in. There's a lot I don't get.

Do the justices VOTE on which cases to review and which to shitcan? If not, who decides? Just what earthshaking worthy-of-the-SCOTUS legal basis is so fuggin' important?

Well, the rights of a wife when her husband dies to start with, or the rights of a man when his wife dies.

What about the children from either step children or natural born children for instance.  Don't children have the right to inherit from a parent that dies or to collect on moneys owed to that parent.?

What a mess, woman marries millionare and he dies.  His kids come in to claim all his money leaving the wife out in the cold. It is none of their damn business theirs fathers marriage, the father was never declared incompetent until after his death.

Later on woman has a child and then conveniently dies.   Can not that child inherent the money from her estate and any and all moneys owed to their mother.?  ---Not to mention the child's only sibling also dies a questionable death.

A will you say would have made things most clear, but for anyone who ever read Agatha Christie, the new wills tend to go missing at times.

So who has dibs on the deceased money, the children or wife or husband.?

An aside on a related topic.   I worked with a man who as a infant was in an accident with his mother and father and they died.  The child went into foster care with relatives and the resulting lawsuit landed him a trust fund for $300,000.00 to be turned over to him at age 18.

The relatives received State aid for caring for him, and money was with drawn from his trust for a new home to care for him in, a new car every few years to drive him about.  Very little money was spent for him from his trust for clothing, schooling or even a pair of eye glasses, the kid was half blind for half their life. the kid was tolerated but just that.

At 18 he moved out  or was asked to leave, to find his trust fund had less then $80,000 left and the State took that for repayment for the State aid his care givers had gotten.

All this stuff we never think about relating to what could happen to our family in the case of say you win a big Lottery.   Or even if poor, what happens to the posesions of a person that dies, do the kids have the right to take their parents personal posesions such as family heirlooms of that parent or does the step father have the right to give away these things to another woman.?

Big questions that if we die we will never know about.




Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2835/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case
« Reply #6 on: September 28, 2010, 09:12:17 PM »
Well, the rights of a wife when her husband dies to start with, or the rights of a man when his wife dies.

What about the children from either step children or natural born children for instance.  Don't children have the right to inherit from a parent that dies or to collect on moneys owed to that parent.?

What a mess, woman marries millionare and he dies.  His kids come in to claim all his money leaving the wife out in the cold. It is none of their damn business theirs fathers marriage, the father was never declared incompetent until after his death.

Later on woman has a child and then conveniently dies.   Can not that child inherent the money from her estate and any and all moneys owed to their mother.?  ---Not to mention the child's only sibling also dies a questionable death.

A will you say would have made things most clear, but for anyone who ever read Agatha Christie, the new wills tend to go missing at times.

So who has dibs on the deceased money, the children or wife or husband.?

An aside on a related topic.   I worked with a man who as a infant was in an accident with his mother and father and they died.  The child went into foster care with relatives and the resulting lawsuit landed him a trust fund for $300,000.00 to be turned over to him at age 18.

The relatives received State aid for caring for him, and money was with drawn from his trust for a new home to care for him in, a new car every few years to drive him about.  Very little money was spent for him from his trust for clothing, schooling or even a pair of eye glasses, the kid was half blind for half their life. the kid was tolerated but just that.

At 18 he moved out  or was asked to leave, to find his trust fund had less then $80,000 left and the State took that for repayment for the State aid his care givers had gotten.

All this stuff we never think about relating to what could happen to our family in the case of say you win a big Lottery.   Or even if poor, what happens to the posesions of a person that dies, do the kids have the right to take their parents personal posesions such as family heirlooms of that parent or does the step father have the right to give away these things to another woman.?

Big questions that if we die we will never know about.


Vesta, all of these things should easily be solved at lower court levels. I utterly fail to see why in the name of God SCOTUS has to review THIS CASE. AGAIN.
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline soleil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2151
  • Reputation: +57/-31
Re: Supreme Court to hear Anna Nicole Smith estate case
« Reply #7 on: September 28, 2010, 09:25:57 PM »
Vesta, all of these things should easily be solved at lower court levels. I utterly fail to see why in the name of God SCOTUS has to review THIS CASE. AGAIN.


I agree. This is to be decided on the state level. It is a whole lot of money, and my thoughts on where it should go aren't relevant. I know it isn't always black and white, but if he was sane when he wrote his LW&T, then his estate should be probated as he wished. I am not sure of the details on this. Maybe he was considered of sound mind by some and not by others. But how many times can they hear the same case?