Oh goody.
Francis can't handle the school yard so he summons the rest of the Glee Club.
Instead of tossing around dime-a-dozen ad homs how about you kiddies actually discuss matters of law.
Sounds like Constitutional due process is up for interpretation...until the abuse of it concerns the person holding that misguided view.
"Due process" does not apply in matters of war. That's what makes it a war: the normal legal strictures do not apply.
Wow!
So let's follow some logic here....
So Holder wants to guarantee that the 'enemy comabatents' receive their due process rights guaranteed under the Constitution.....ie...Gitmo....Civilian trials.....constitutional rights.....yada yada
BUT!!!!! and a big ole fat BUT!!!!!
You conservitives (loosely) want to argue that an executive order to assasinate a US citizen is justifiable !!WITHOUT!! due process???????
And you call yourselves conservitive?
You really need to be ashamed of yourselves.
You have NO respect for the rule of law.
You guys are way in over your head.
Scott
Whatever Nancy.
You aren't even internally consistent. REAL conservatives, not you Ron Paul anus lickers (see how easy it is to apply and strip credentials), don't approve of Holder's actions because combatants are not subject to civil jurisprudence they are subject to the laws of war because their actions are acts of war. National origin matters not one iota because an act of war is an act of war and people who levy war against any nation are not granted the legal protections of the nation they seek to destroy. They gain a military response.
Get it? Or do I need to type slower?
One thing is for sure, in the end I will not be fighting on your side.
Yes, well...
...if you ever fight against me all I have to do is take sanctuary in a hostile foreign nation where I can bomb your cities with impunity and you can't touch me so...