Awwww, They Mentioned Us

[Revolution]

spiritual_gunfighter  (1000+ posts)      Sun Jul-18-10 10:15 PM
Original message
I found this creepy anti-DU forum
 I wont link it because I think it might be against the rules, but I stumbled on it tonight from a link on here and someone in the comments section of the said link posted the link for this forum.

I had no idea this stuff existed. They seem to know personal stuff about members, dont any of these people have jobs?

Do you guys know about this site?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8772150

Skip Intro  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-18-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Really, four?
 I only know of that one we're not supposed to mention. Discussion forum. Cheap knockoff of this site.

 ....Right.....

KingFlorez (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-18-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's been around for quite awhile
 They are really pathetic over there, I recall one of them trying to find out where a DUer worked, so they could call up and get them fired for making negative comments about Republicans. It's a cesspool for sure.

And I know they're talking about us now, because I remember reading the REAL version of what happened here at CC. Florez is calling you out, man. You know who you are.

[franksolich]

Oh my.

Great find, sir, and we all thank you.

You know, the primitives have "discovered" us before, but it still comes as a shock to them that we exist.

[NHSparky]

Not to worry, DUmmies.  A few of you paddle through here from time to time, only to find we are more civilized than you savages, and that heads are used here for thinking, not for shrinking.

[Revolution]

proud2BlibKansan  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-18-10 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yes I know that site and it is indeed creepy
 One of those guys was the one who started the website criticizing Andy Stephenson when he was dying of cancer.

They are truly basement dwelling despicable assholes.

And hey since they are probably reading this thread, here's a message for them:


**** YOU

Now that you've cursed us out, maybe you can ease your pain at the expense of one of your poor sheep.

Dick.

flvegan  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-18-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. You're totally getting your own thread over there in 3...2...1...
 "Primitive angry at us mocking Andy" blah blah blah.

Day late, and a dollar short. Story of your life, me thinks.

[franksolich]

Not to worry, DUmmies.  A few of you paddle through here from time to time, only to find we are more civilized than you savages, and that heads are used here for thinking, not for shrinking.

Once in a while, there's a primitive who really doesn't know we exist, and gets all hot and excited and bent out of shape upon discovering us, indignant and embarrassed and all that.

When that happens, it reminds me of a frequent, uh, social problem I deal with around here, given that I can't hear.

Public restrooms have locks on them, and I've never seen a lock that didn't work.

However, there are some people who refuse to lock the restroom when they go sit down on the can.

And so here comes franksolich, confidently striding through the unlocked door, opening it wide.....

And when a primitive honestly finds us for the first time, one is reminded of the shock and embarrassment and indignation that occurs when one is pants-at-the-ankles on the porcelain throne, and the whole world sees.

[franksolich]

Oh my.

Anne's angry with us.

[Ballygrl]

Oh my.

Great find, sir, and we all thank you.

You know, the primitives have "discovered" us before, but it still comes as a shock to them that we exist.

Frank, AllentownJake paid you a compliment:

AllentownJake
Writers
Pallino

Posts: 3386

Re: I'm Mad As Hell And I'm Not Going To Take It Anymore
« Reply #24 on: Today at 01:23:41 PM »   

If I want to talk to a conservative,  I'll email fransolich at least he is well read and we can have an honest discussion.  Take your bill o'reiley nonsense elsewhere.

[franksolich]

Frank, AllentownJake paid you a compliment:

Well, that was mighty manly of him, and I'm flattered.

But I hope the Allentown dude didn't ruin his credibility on the elm-infested ulmic shores (his new home after leaving Skins's island), by saying that.

[Revolution]

proud2BlibKansan  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-18-10 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. Now let's be honest here. 
 Edited on Sun Jul-18-10 10:44 PM by proud2BlibKansan
Last time I checked they had some nonsensical pet name for me. That would be in the title of the thread.

And please allow me once again to tell them


**** YOU AND THE HORSE THAT BRUNG YOU TOO

It's "and the horse you rode in on" idiot.

My own personal moniker for this guy with be The Kansas Sheep Herding primitive. (No offense to any other human being residing in Kansas.)

[Ballygrl]

spiritual_gunfighter  (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-18-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. No it is not the ex-members site I know that one
   this one is different. These losers obviously read DU obsessively in order to know so many personal things about DUers. I was creeped out by it that someone's life is so pathetic that they obsess about what the other side is doing.

It is actually kinda sad.

And they tell us to get jobs.

I don't give a hoot about your personal life, I love politics and since I can't openly join DU I can address your issues here.

[franksolich]

It's "and the horse you rode in on" idiot.

My own personal moniker for this guy with be The Kansas Sheep Herding primitive. (No offense to any other human being residing in Kansas.)

The dysmenopausal Kansas school teacher, this particular primitive, is a femme.

She's got a whole lot of things messed up with her lower-torso part that makes her a bitch.

I've suggested she get some Lydia Pinkham's Special Vegetable Compound for Female Complaints, the pre-FDA stuff, but the dysmenopausal Kansas school teacher won't take my advice; she'd rather be wretched and miserable and hate-filled (and few can Hate as vigorously as Anne can), than well.

[Ballygrl]

Stinky The Clown  (1000+ posts)          Sun Jul-18-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
37. I'm betting it was the site that named me as 2009 Primitive of the Year   
   An award I continue to cherish, I might add.

They had fun with my heart attack, too. That's the kind of swell folks they are.

Hi Guys and Gals!!!!!

And because they're immature little wankers, I'll use this to send the greeting.

YooHoo .... enjoy!!!

Stinky wasn't the 2009 Primitive of the year, right?

Oh, and I sincerely hope Stinky is feeling better, I don't wish anyone ill, it's strictly politics.

[NHSparky]

The dysmenopausal Kansas school teacher, this particular primitive, is a femme.

She's got a whole lot of things messed up with her lower-torso part that makes her a bitch.

I've suggested she get some Lydia Pinkham's Special Vegetable Compound for Female Complaints, the pre-FDA stuff, but the dysmenopausal Kansas school teacher won't take my advice; she'd rather be wretched and miserable and hate-filled (and few can Hate as vigorously as Anne can), than well.

Are you saying that even the "14-Day Active Challenge" would not help her?

Oh my.  That IS serious.

[Revolution]

I'll just call her Anne then.

Though, just cause she is female doesn't mean she can't still "play" with the sheep...

Side Note: Starry Primitive doesn't seem to like you frank. Must just break your heart...

[franksolich]

Stinky wasn't the 2009 Primitive of the year, right?

No, the sparkling husband primitive is lying.

He made it only to the 5th spot, not to the 1st.

I dunno how well he's going to do in the voting for Top Primitive of 2010, though; at the moment, it seems he may crack the top ten, but not as high as last year.  The sparkling husband primitive's got to get into shape, if he hopes to do better this year.

[Ballygrl]

67 Guests, 18 Users

Lots of pm'ing going on.

[franksolich]

Who's the startling message primitive, flipping the finger at franksolich?

Must be one of the obscure unterprimitiven, part of the faceless lynch mob, the amorphous blob, that is 99.7% of Skins's island.

I'm flattered now; that means franksolich now has TWO readers, Pedro Picasso and this startling message primitive.

[Ballygrl]

Who's the startling message primitive, flipping the finger at franksolich?

Must be one of the obscure unterprimitiven, part of the faceless lynch mob, the amorphous blob, that is 99.7% of Skins's island.

I'm flattered now; that means franksolich now has TWO readers, Pedro Picasso and this startling message primitive.

Starry Messenger Frank, no idea who they are.

[Revolution]

Anne saw the "Obscure Primitive," and raised it a finger.

[Ballygrl]

The thread is locked.

[Ballygrl]

152 Guests, 21 Users

[Revolution]

With all the scurring going on, I'm sure anoth thread will crop up soon enough. Lord knows it did with the Cheney news.

[JLO]

152 Guests, 21 Users

That's gotta be a record! 

[delilahmused]

My interest is solely scientific...sort of like how an exterminator is interested in a cockroach.

Cindie

[TheSarge]

Well, that was mighty manly of him, and I'm flattered.

But I hope the Allentown dude didn't ruin his credibility on the elm-infested ulmic shores (his new home after leaving Skins's island), by saying that.

frank he ruined his credibility after he ran back to DU and trashed us after being treated very fairly here.

KingFlorez (1000+ posts)        Sun Jul-18-10 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's been around for quite awhile
 They are really pathetic over there, I recall one of them trying to find out where a DUer worked, so they could call up and get them fired for making negative comments about Republicans. It's a cesspool for sure.

Hey pot...this is kettle...you're NOT gonna believe this!

mike_c   (1000+ posts)             Wed Sep-13-06 05:26 PM
Original message
my letter to (Name Removed) base commander....
   

 
Edited on Wed Sep-13-06 05:39 PM by mike_c
Several folks have asked me to copy them the complaint I wrote to Cpl. (Name Removed) base commander following his recent political denunciation letter to my department chairman. For those of you who haven't see it, this is in reference to this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x2109093

Here is the letter:

Colonel Brian W. Lauritzen, Garrison Commander
Dept. of the Army
U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Belvoir
Command Group
9820 Flagler Road
Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-5932   

Dear Colonel Lauritzen,

I am writing to complain about the actions of a soldier under your command and to ask you some questions about his recent activities.

Corporal (Name Removed) recently sent—- via email—- what can only be described as a political denunciation to the chairman of my department. I’ve attached a copy of the letter. In it, he cites his rank and his status in the U.S. Army as justification for his actions. He appeared to suggest that I be reprimanded for engaging in protected free speech, and in particular for an opinion I wrote as a private citizen, outside the context of my employment at the California State University. It’s hard to imagine why else he would seek to have me censored by my department chairperson. After sending the denouncement, Cpl. (Name Removed) further attempted to orchestrate a letter writing campaign against me on a conservative internet political forum. My department chairman subsequently received several additional letters denouncing me. Cpl. (Name Removed) comments and the rather shocking rhetoric he incited can be viewed at this URL (where he posts under the account name “txradioguy”):

(removed a link to the site which shall not be linked, per DU rules)

To be sure, I understand that the views I expressed were provocative and unpopular with many servicepersons and other supporters of the war against Iraq. The comments he quoted were ones I made in March, 2005, and while my opinions have moderated somewhat in the year and a half since I made those remarks, I certainly do not expect him—- or you—- to agree with them. However, I would expect him to respect my right to express them, and not to seek retribution against me through my employer.

Luckily, there is little to be concerned about regarding a reprimand from my university administrators. First, I am a tenured professor, so my opinions about public affairs outside the classroom are unlikely to cause me grief, even when they are unpopular with some. Second, although he implies that I am some sort of new “Ward Churchill,” in fact my job performance is regularly reviewed by my supervisors and my colleagues and has never been judged inconsistent with the mission of my parent institution. I have few concerns about any negative impact resulting from Cpl. (Name Removed) denunciation campaign against me. However, I wonder who else he has sent such denunciations to-— the comments in the discussion forum I cited above alluded to unnamed additional recipients.

It is unseemly for Cpl (Name Removed) to misuse his authority as a U.S. serviceman to seek limits on the protected activities of a fellow citizen, even one with whom he disagrees vehemently. I would greatly appreciate answers from your office regarding the following questions:

1. Is it the policy of the U.S. Army or of your command to encourage personnel to denounce the exercise of free speech by private citizens? Do you countenance political denunciation letters to employers or to other government offices, written under authority of your command?

2. Cpl. (Name Removed) cites his authority as an Army serviceman in his denunciation. Is making political denunciations among Cpl. (Name Removed) assigned duties? Does that mission extend to organizing broader letter writing campaigns against U.S. citizens?

3. A cursory examination of several political discussion forums, including the one cited above, reveals that Cpl. (Name Removed) posts his comments and his denunciations during a wide variety of times, including during regular working hours. Is he participating in those activities during his duty shifts, and if so, is he using U.S. government computers and internet bandwidth to do so? Do such activities have the approval of your command?

4. Did Cpl.  (Name Removed) use U.S. government resources to compose and deliver his denunciation to my employers? Is that activity approved under your command?

Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please do not hesitate to contact me directly if I can provide any further information.

Respectfully yours,


Michael Camann

Cc: (my chairperson)
Capt. Steven Schwoerke
Rep. Mike Thompson

Hey KingFlorez you hypocritical asshat...what was that again about a cesspool?

Unlike you I CAN link a reference to your ****ed up website to show where you morons have tried to get someone not only silenced in their right to speak freely...but tried to endanger their livelihood as well.

Oh and for the lurkers...not only did I NOT get in trouble...I've been promoted three times since then.

Suck on it DUmmies.

As a matter of full disclosure I went through and removed my real name from the letter from mike_c sent to the Garrison Commander of the post where I lived not worked at.  I and my family have been through enough thanks to the DUmmies.