Uh huh.
FDR stuck to his guns too and the country is still paying for the shit that socialist asshole did too.
I certainly am not going to argue that his position is at all right, just or moral. I just find it ironic, in some sense, that many of us have been asking for a steadfast leader for years, perhaps decades, and when we finally get one, he's unfortunately on the wrong side of freedom, liberty, rule of law, COTUS, etc, etc..
Is it possible to respect steadfastness while still thinking he's an a-hole whose only goal in life is to destroy the very country we live in?