http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/speciation.html
You have to be kidding if you think that adaptation to an environment equals evolution.
Show me where a dog or cat has morphed into a completely different form of life with no similarities to the original.
What those articles talk about is hybridization.
One of your examples from the first link..
5.6 Flour Beetles (Tribolium castaneum)
Halliburton and Gall (1981) established a population of flour beetles collected in Davis, California. In each generation they selected the 8 lightest and the 8 heaviest pupae of each sex. When these 32 beetles had emerged, they were placed together and allowed to mate for 24 hours. Eggs were collected for 48 hours. The pupae that developed from these eggs were weighed at 19 days. This was repeated for 15 generations. The results of mate choice tests between heavy and light beetles was compared to tests among control lines derived from randomly chosen pupae. Positive assortative mating on the basis of size was found in 2 out of 4 experimental lines.
Tell me how this proves evolution please?
Even in the most convoluted thinking that somehow it does it still only showed a 50 % "success" rate.
That would bring us back to the first problem with evolution through natural selection..the time required.
For evolution to "work" Goulds punctuated equilibrium almost has to be applied but that raises the unanswerable question as to why?
Why has evolution taken off in hyperactive spurts to accomplish what we see around us within a time frame that can correlate with evolutionists own geological dating.
Why does it stop and then let natural selection thin the new evolutionary herd so to speak.
There are no answers for this but it is just brushed aside as being "fact" and not investigated.
That makes it a religion not a science.