That's a claim 100% stuck in ignorance of the facts.
Facts? Oh you mean those pesky facts I've been referring to and linking to that disprove the crap that you and TNO have ben babbling.
Gotcha.
Evolution, like any proper branch of science, makes predictions that are testable for accuracy against the theory.
No they haven't. Einstein when he presented his theory of relativity presented a series of tests to try and prove it wrong.
No such tests exist for the theory of Evolution.
You and the rest of the cultists we are suppsoed to jsut accept it as fact and not question the actual science that went into the proclamation.
For example, based on an examination of the fossil record of mammallike reptiles (the gorgonopsids and their kin, for which the fossil record is remarkably complete) it was hypothesized that mammalian inner-ear bones evolved from processes on the mandible that grew thinner and smaller and eventually detached themselves from the jaw and migrated to the ear where they were exapted to perform their new "job." Hypothesize, I say, because there was a crucial gap in the fossil record at just the moment in evolutionary time where the critical detachment would occur. Of course this simply gave paleontologists an opportunity to predict the critical adaptation would be eventually discovered in the fossil record. And, 20 years later, so it was: the extremely well preserved skeleton of a species now known as Diarthrognathus (and several others since that first discovery) was uncovered, at the right moment in the fossil chronology, and it showed exactly the predicted critical adaptation to the jaw.
The jawbone theory...a favorite of the Evo crowd doesn't prove your theory. Granted it's one of the areas of the fossil record that's not as out of whack with your theory as the rest...but it doesn't prove evolution.
It actually brings to mind even more questions.
How did those bones figure out just where to go? What caused them to land just so and not say...end up on the spine?
What evidence do you have that in the reptile-to-mammal transition those bones would have ended up in any other place than what they did?
What is the process of natural selection that cause things to happen just like they did?
This scientific theory you preach and proclaim has as much hard science behind it as a Tarot card reading.
]quote]That is a staement of pure faith on your part. I just demonstrated your ignorance concerning the fossil record as a confirmer of evolution. Wanna try for more? Give me a specific claim.
[/quote]
Just one problem here sport. In everything I'm citing there are definite yes and no answers with scientific facts and background to them.
Everything TNO and now you...his ringer...are posting has words like "speculation" "eventually" lots of talk about "predictions" and some flat out gaps that have no explanation.
You're going after and cherry picking the usual easy targets for your type to attempt to shoot down and skipping the things that you and the alleged thinkers behind the Evolution fairy tale can't answer or explain.