Author Topic: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'  (Read 2195 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bijou

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8937
  • Reputation: +336/-26
Quote
The US blocked Dutch attempts to install full-body scanners for passengers travelling to the US before the failed suicide bombing of a transatlantic flight on Christmas Day, the Dutch interior minister said today.

Authorities at Schipol airport in Amsterdam had wanted to introduce the devices to monitor US-bound flights, but the scanners were not installed because US authorities wanted them to be used on flights to all destinations, said Guusje Ter Horst

The disclosure could put further pressure on Barack Obama, who has come under criticism in the US after the security lapse that allowed a young Nigerian Islamist to board a US plane on Christmas day carrying explosives. He has been charged with trying to destroy the Northwest Airlines flight, bound for Detroit from Amsterdam. ...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/30/body-scanners-blocked-us-netherlands



Offline bkg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2306
  • Reputation: +4/-15
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2009, 02:25:01 PM »
So Amsterdam won't put in body scanners because the US wants them for all flights? Does Amsterdam have no autonomy to decide what they want to do in their airports? 

To be transparent I'm against body scanners in general - in the USA.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2009, 03:53:31 PM »
I can understand the US requiring certain standards be met for flights to the US.  I can NOT understand why they would prevent another country from going above and beyond the minimum requirements.  :mental:

The US is going to be the primary target of these kinds of attacks, so why not let them just screen US bound flights?

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2009, 10:40:08 PM »
So Amsterdam won't put in body scanners because the US wants them for all flights? Does Amsterdam have no autonomy to decide what they want to do in their airports? 

To be transparent I'm against body scanners in general - in the USA.

I wonder about the possible long term medical effects of such scanning if done frequently.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2009, 01:25:10 PM »
Quote
The US blocked Dutch attempts to install full-body scanners for passengers travelling to the US before the failed suicide bombing of a transatlantic flight on Christmas Day, the Dutch interior minister said today.

Just something about the way that is worded screams of artful fingerpointing and telling perhaps somewhat less than the full and absolutely complete version of what really happened.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline RightCoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3438
  • Reputation: +185/-24
  • Semper Fi means more than most will ever know
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2009, 02:07:41 PM »
To be transparent I'm against body scanners in general - in the USA.

What were the originating cities of the September 11, 2001 planes again?
nine eleven is a car
nine one one is an emergency service
September 11, 2001 was an attack
Never Forget, or Minimize.

Offline Ladywinter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2009, 02:13:37 PM »
This report doesn't "smell" right.  Hmm

I don't fly that often but when I do - not sure I'd like the body scanner.?  I think it would be totally embarrassing! All I can say, if it goes this way, the scanner person better have a great sense of humor cause they are bound to see a lot. :whatever:

I wonder how much the scan shows anyway???
« Last Edit: December 31, 2009, 02:16:06 PM by Ladywinter »
Exit Strategy...

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #7 on: December 31, 2009, 02:19:31 PM »
This report doesn't "smell" right.  Hmm

I don't fly that often but when I do - not sure I'd like the body scanner.?  I think it would be totally embarrassing! All I can say, if it goes this way, the scanner person better have a great sense of humor cause they are bound to see a lot. :whatever:

I wonder how much the scan shows anyway???



Offline Ladywinter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 170
  • Reputation: +0/-0
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #8 on: December 31, 2009, 02:24:40 PM »
 :rotf: Like I said...the scanner person better have a GREAT sense of humor!  OMG!!! :rotf:
Exit Strategy...

Offline Chris

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Reputation: +522/-16
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #9 on: December 31, 2009, 02:28:30 PM »
:rotf: Like I said...the scanner person better have a GREAT sense of humor!  OMG!!! :rotf:
Maybe that's the job TwixBoy applied for. :p
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

Offline RightCoast

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3438
  • Reputation: +185/-24
  • Semper Fi means more than most will ever know
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #10 on: December 31, 2009, 02:36:41 PM »
I've heard that the newer scanners show an avatar superimposed over the human figure so contraband is still seen but personal detail is not. Don't know if that's the case or not but it would make a lot of sense.
nine eleven is a car
nine one one is an emergency service
September 11, 2001 was an attack
Never Forget, or Minimize.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Body scanners blocked by US 'could have prevented attempted plane attack'
« Reply #11 on: December 31, 2009, 02:43:08 PM »
I've heard that the newer scanners show an avatar superimposed over the human figure so contraband is still seen but personal detail is not. Don't know if that's the case or not but it would make a lot of sense.

Does the avatar expand and contract depending on the size of the viewee?