Author Topic: Why vote GOP back in?  (Read 22501 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Oceander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #175 on: January 02, 2010, 12:41:23 PM »
Lol thank you for that!  I will use it. 

You're most welcome!

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #176 on: January 02, 2010, 12:49:48 PM »
How about finding a new record to play.  We've heard this one already......  Several times in fact.

And yet there's never a straight answer to the question when it's asked.
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #177 on: January 02, 2010, 12:53:26 PM »
Quote
What scares me about 2012 is the onslaught of support that keeps being thrown into Paul or another third party.

The you get scared over very tiny things.  There's no "onslaught" of support for Paul...never has been never will.

If you consider an "onslaught" the spamming of talk shows and conservative boards by a handful of cultists then you need to rethink just how muc or little support Ron Paul really has.
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #178 on: January 02, 2010, 12:56:27 PM »
LOL well sort of.  When I was with the teams I picked up the nickname because I could find a target day or night, rain or shine and take it out with my team.  They called me Javelin saying I was like a human javelin.  The name stuck after that.  Most called me Jav.

Never realized that the Force Recon guys referred to themselves as "teams".
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19742
  • Reputation: +1491/-100
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #179 on: January 02, 2010, 12:57:17 PM »
Ahhh.. Finally an explanation that makes sense.  Thank you for the back drop story.  It would make perfect sense considering the drama that took place as to why so many get hyped up over RP.  I have had very little affiliation with any political forums whatsoever.  I have been active on weapons forum but those are largely non political but more so educational on weapons systems.  Being active there can make someone that is knowledgeable on a weapons system look like an idiot when an armorer shows up that really knows his stuff lol.  

What scares me about 2012 is the onslaught of support that keeps being thrown into Paul or another third party.  What many of these people do not understand is that even if a third party were elected they would be essentially powerless to a great degree with little to no support from the senate.  Every passage of a bill would take so much strain it would make Regan's beginning look like a walk in the park.  I am not opposed by a third party entering the arena but it first will take the establishment of that base in the State levels then Congress before a Presidency can even be thought of.

The best hope we have is 2010 and to utterly annihilate those that are presently there running down the list replacing all the traitors we can.  Perhaps then we can at least get a good man in office for 2012 that is actually a good man an not a label for a brand of the GOP.  We need real men there at this time.  

I do believe that in time either the GOP will be revived back to what it should be or replaced.  It would not surprise me to see the democratic party replaced by libertarian for most libertarians seem to be reformed democrats.  Yet either way, I do not see the current system surviving another two to three generations for the sheer momentum of real world events economically and socially are dictating this more than the monarch mindset of those that seek to control the system.

For those that look to Ron Paul for salvation, they are truly crazy.  Yet I do stick by my statements that he is not all bad, he has many good ideas that should be looked into such as auditing the Fed and or the destruction of it.  I also like his sons idea, Rand Paul, of setting term limits.  Just keep in mind I do not support Paul in any way politically.

Now at least I can understand why i was attacked and I can see why those here have a bit more deep seated anger for the topic.  



Fwiw I would also go on to say it isn`t just that someone supports him it is that entire Libertarian mindset which can`t be logically defensed so they resort to hyperbole.(I know you say you aren`t but have run acrossed many Constitution party members at Free Republic that do the same).
The Constitution party platform is far more in line with conservative thought so I am curious as to why as you alluded to earlier many will hop on a Libertarian bandwagon.
Is it thinking that name recognition in lieu of Pat Buchanan making a much publicized jump to them,now since retracted I guess,gives them a better chance of the 3rd party revolution they dream of?

Offline Javelin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
  • Reputation: +1/-4
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #180 on: January 02, 2010, 01:05:35 PM »
Never realized that the Force Recon guys referred to themselves as "teams".

I was never with Force Recon.  The teams I speak of were when I was with civilian contractors.  There you run across many from various backgrounds including those from civilian police forces.  It is a different breed altogether.

Offline Lacarnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4154
  • Reputation: +316/-315
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #181 on: January 02, 2010, 01:08:41 PM »
The you get scared over very tiny things.  There's no "onslaught" of support for Paul...never has been never will.

If you consider an "onslaught" the spamming of talk shows and conservative boards by a handful of cultists then you need to rethink just how muc or little support Ron Paul really has.

Very true. Paulbots will have very little support. Sarah Palin will dwarf him by a thousand times in upcoming elections. She is the one to lead the party out of the wilderness. The party does not need entrenched political figures like Newt or Romney . Need some new blood in the party that will turn DC around on its ears. Palin is the only one that I see that has the backbone to do that.

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #182 on: January 02, 2010, 01:12:18 PM »
I was never with Force Recon.  The teams I speak of were when I was with civilian contractors.  There you run across many from various backgrounds including those from civilian police forces.  It is a different breed altogether.

Oh so you mean like Black Water?  Your response to MSB didn't differentiate between your time in the Corps and now the time you say you spent with Civilian Contractors in these "teams".

Just trying to get a clearer picture.
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline Javelin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
  • Reputation: +1/-4
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #183 on: January 02, 2010, 01:17:28 PM »
Fwiw I would also go on to say it isn`t just that someone supports him it is that entire Libertarian mindset which can`t be logically defensed so they resort to hyperbole.(I know you say you aren`t but have run acrossed many Constitution party members at Free Republic that do the same).
The Constitution party platform is far more in line with conservative thought so I am curious as to why as you alluded to earlier many will hop on a Libertarian bandwagon.
Is it thinking that name recognition in lieu of Pat Buchanan making a much publicized jump to them,now since retracted I guess,gives them a better chance of the 3rd party revolution they dream of?

The whole libertarian mindest imo is twisted with the utopian dreams of the left.  I see many crowding that arena due to dissatisfaction with Obama.  You have a few former republicans that are in that crowd but the libertarians as a whole are far to broad to stroke a few lines about and peg them.  While some of their ideas are well founded, some ideas downright good, most of their ideas are for pot smoking hippies especially since it seems this is where the base of this crown originated from lol.  The former democrats seem to be happy to move to the libertarian crowd.  I found it odd the other day when I passed by a car and I saw a "green movement Al Gore" bumper sticker right beside a "libertarian dont tread on me" sticker.... I sort of scratched my head trying to figure out how well those two work together.  Who knows maybe they were just vegetarians and were not fully educated.. who knows.

As to a 3rd party revolution, it is a matter of time that some sort of revolution takes place whether political or otherwise.  It may take place with reform of the parties yet I find this less likely as more time passes by.  The next generation that is coming along seem to care less about party and more about agenda.  It will morph based upon our society at the time and with the morphing of our society being led away from God, its a scary transition that can lead to a more violent metamorphosis.  

The possibility of a constitutionalists party taking over, in my opinion, should never happen.  A constitutionalists should be what what one is, not a party.  Nevertheless a marriage of the constitutionalists into a reformed Republican or a reformed Democratic party would be successful.  If they cannot manage this the emergence of a 3rd party, of some kind, is inevitable.  If it does not happen, or if reform does not take place, civil unrest is unavoidable.

Well time for me to sign off for a while, take the wife shopping and the kids out to play.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2010, 01:21:55 PM by Javelin »

Offline Freeper

  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #184 on: January 02, 2010, 08:13:48 PM »
I'm late to the party but my answer is with the GOP in the majority we can rein in Lord O's socialist dreams.
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #185 on: January 02, 2010, 09:48:48 PM »
I'm late to the party but my answer is with the GOP in the majority we can rein in Lord O's socialist dreams.

That and with the adults back in charge...National Security won't be the punchline to a joke.
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #186 on: January 02, 2010, 10:14:15 PM »
And yet there's never a straight answer to the question when it's asked.

Untrue.

I answered it IIRC.  FL perhaps didn't like the answer so therefore falsely claims it was never answered.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #187 on: January 02, 2010, 10:24:41 PM »
Untrue.

I answered it IIRC.  FL perhaps didn't like the answer so therefore falsely claims it was never answered.

If that happened it would be a first for a Ronulan.  99.9% of the ones I've encountered can't answer the question with anything that makes sense outside their own cult.
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #188 on: January 02, 2010, 10:28:09 PM »
If that happened it would be a first for a Ronulan.  99.9% of the ones I've encountered can't answer the question with anything that makes sense outside their own cult.

No if about it.  I answered it.

So anyone that disagrees with the GOP is now a Ronulan?  Or am I misreading your intent?
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline Oceander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #189 on: January 02, 2010, 10:34:32 PM »
*   *   *

Well time for me to sign off for a while, take the wife shopping and the kids out to play.

Now that sounds like the most sensible thing anyone's said today on this thread!  Have fun, and enjoy your kids, they grow up way, way too fast (my daughter's 5 y.o. now, and it still seems like only yesterday that we brought her home from the hospital).

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #190 on: January 02, 2010, 10:43:40 PM »
Now that sounds like the most sensible thing anyone's said today on this thread!  Have fun, and enjoy your kids, they grow up way, way too fast (my daughter's 5 y.o. now, and it still seems like only yesterday that we brought her home from the hospital).

My baby girl turned 25 today.  I know all about that "growing up" way to fast thing.  It seems like just last week when she was born.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline Javelin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 225
  • Reputation: +1/-4
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #191 on: January 02, 2010, 10:46:33 PM »
You answered your own qualms in hoping that the GOP will move to the right and saying that you don`t believe in a utopian world.

What then is the minimum of agreement you would still support?
It is kind of a silly question I guess in that acceptance of less then perfect can shift when faced with the real life alternative but do you think this country has the time right now to sort all that out?

If no one can state how things can halt what we are seeing happening now in 2010 or 2012 then what point is there in talking about what may be 15 years from now?
That is my "honest" question and one that is immediate imo rather then speculating on ideals.

I went back and found this post, it is in response to Rich.  To see what Rich said it will be his first post on either the first or second page of this thread.  I wanted to respond to this directly in concept rather than post a response to Carl.  So Carl no offense but Rich and you just happened to offer up the scenario, and its for everyone to think about.  While some may be inclined to hit the reply button before you get to the 4th paragraph, please read this whole post for the beginning is a set up for a very important question, point and observation.

Rich made a point and I later basically made the same point yet coming from a different angle.  In the end we both end up in the same place.  We refuse to vote for a GOP president that is not worthy of being our candidate.  Ok everyone put their eyeballs back in and put out the flames for the moment... cause I have more that might just set you on fire and I dont want you to miss anything.

Carl made a good point.  When is conservative enough... well conservative enough?  What criteria would or should determine the point at which any individual decides to vote or to not vote for a given candidate?  Yet Rich's and my point can offer a circular argument in the question ... when is not conservative enough.. well not conservative enough?  The circular argument, reasoning all comes back to personal perspective, desires and a LOT depends on how active one is politically as well.  Typically I have found with those that I deal with politically the more active you are, the more you demand.  Yet lets not get stuck here just yet either.. there is another bridge I would like to cross with this very same idea.

At what point through this political nightmare we have been living in is there enough pain for conservatives to actually stand up and do something?  I am not talking about a tea party.  Yeah its a great rally but it accomplishes nothing in real terms.  I am speaking directly to your local area, your city, county and state level.  Here is why I ask this very important question.  While we are the conservatives of America, the reason why our conservative status is the way it is... well.. we failed.  Too many sat back and became the silent majority and now most of them are semi-silent.  They went to a tea party, got a few pictures taken and went "Already taxed enough" and so on.  They then work with their online 9-12 groups or other conservative groups to create this idea of changing the system.  My problem with it all is a matter of perhaps, too little, to late.

For those that continue to stick to a strict party line, they may find they have a hand in the destruction of our nation rather than its restoration.  We have a unique ability in this United States of America to have a revolution every four years, quite literally, yet its via a ballot box.  When I look at the government now, its unlike any other time in history.  Every part has managed to be compromised despite all of the work the founders did in setting the checks and balances which were supposed to stop this kind of madness.  Yet if we do not use the ballot box a our form of revolution, we may indeed find ourselves within a civil war.

I decided some time ago to forget the party, and vote the man.  I am a conservative, yet if the man does not merit my vote, I will not give it.  My reason is, I am tired of the game.  If I am to change the game then two things must happen.  First I must get involved.  Secondly, I must quit playing the game they want me to play which is the lesser of the two evils.  I can fully understand someone claiming that is the only choice they have, yet that also tells me much more about the individual.  For starters they are not as active locally as they should be, if at all.

I hear so many symptomatic woe is me syndromes on the street and online its even more disgusting.  Yet most all conservatives refuse to do two things... 1. Really get involved and then 2. They refuse to quit playing their game.

I worked in a variety of fields within the military and as a civilian contractor.  I have seen the work of insurgents and counter insurgency.  I have seen men fight for the freedom that we do not take seriously enough despite the fact it is evaporating in front of our very eyes.  Revolutions are won from the ground up, not the top down.  I just wonder how long until conservatives in America actually start fighting for their freedom in a revolution of the ballot box from the ground up once again.  I am certainly afraid that if they do not start NOW, they may find themselves fighting for their very lives.

Offline Oceander

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1196
  • Reputation: +1/-0
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #192 on: January 02, 2010, 10:47:05 PM »
My baby girl turned 25 today.  I know all about that "growing up" way to fast thing.  It seems like just last week when she was born.

That's the one silver lining in being out of work for so long now - I'm getting to see things that I would have missed most of if I were at the office 10 hours a day, 5 or 6 days a week, and once those things are gone, they are just gone, and there is no way on God's green earth to get them back.

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #193 on: January 02, 2010, 10:47:57 PM »
A bit of back story for you:

This site is an off-shoot of another conservative site. Most of the high post count members here come from The Other Site (TOS). On TOS was a member by the handle of gator. Gator fancied himself the re-embodiment of the Confederacy and righter of all wrongs involving Israel vis-a-vis The Liberty incident.

In the run-up to the 2008 campaign season Herr gator lost what little of his mind he may have ever possessed and went over to Ron Paul. Alas, about this time Herr gator was also vested with admin authorities. His Ronulan activities attracted the notice of numerous like-but-semi-minded individuals of Paulestinian persuasion. To say they did not acquit themselves with dignity and aplomb would be an understatement. It was not merely one or two of them, it was a universal trait among them. The paranoia, the fear-mongering, strawmen, false dichotomies, ad hominems (particularly "neocon"), indicting the US military etc etc etc.

Whenever one of his Paulestinian cohorts was met in kind Herr gator would ban the "offending" member. I myself was banned for posting article BY Dr Paulsy. Not articles ABOUT Paul but written by his own hand that were so embarrassing gator deleted them and banned me (as opposed to taking an intellectual step back, reassessing his position and shedding his cultism).

The contemporaneous catharsis of our reforming ourselves at this site under such under such injustices can be viewed in the earliest threads of the Fight Club forum which you will be able to view once your post count exceeds 49.

This is why the name Ron Paul! brings such immediate and visceral reactions from this forum. If you are a conservative--and I have no reason to say you are not--you are more than welcome here but be advised, on neighborly terms, that any advocacy of Herr Doktor will unnecessarily complicate whatever point you seek to impart.

I've been here for months and this is the 1st time I've heard the whole story.  

It explains a lot.  Thanks for posting that synopsis.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline TheSarge

  • Platoon Sergeant
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9557
  • Reputation: +411/-252
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #194 on: January 02, 2010, 10:50:38 PM »
No if about it.  I answered it.

So anyone that disagrees with the GOP is now a Ronulan?  Or am I misreading your intent?

Mis reading my intent.
Liberalism Is The Philosophy Of The Stupid

The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years.  The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

If it walks like a donkey and brays like a donkey and smells like a donkey - it's Cold Warrior.  - PoliCon



Palin has run a state, a town and a commercial fishing operation. Obama ain't run nothin' but his mouth. - Mark Steyn

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #195 on: January 02, 2010, 11:01:42 PM »
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #196 on: January 02, 2010, 11:03:51 PM »
I went back and found this post, it is in response to Rich.  To see what Rich said it will be his first post on either the first or second page of this thread.  I wanted to respond to this directly in concept rather than post a response to Carl.  So Carl no offense but Rich and you just happened to offer up the scenario, and its for everyone to think about.  While some may be inclined to hit the reply button before you get to the 4th paragraph, please read this whole post for the beginning is a set up for a very important question, point and observation.

Rich made a point and I later basically made the same point yet coming from a different angle.  In the end we both end up in the same place.  We refuse to vote for a GOP president that is not worthy of being our candidate.  Ok everyone put their eyeballs back in and put out the flames for the moment... cause I have more that might just set you on fire and I dont want you to miss anything.

Carl made a good point.  When is conservative enough... well conservative enough?  What criteria would or should determine the point at which any individual decides to vote or to not vote for a given candidate?  Yet Rich's and my point can offer a circular argument in the question ... when is not conservative enough.. well not conservative enough?  The circular argument, reasoning all comes back to personal perspective, desires and a LOT depends on how active one is politically as well.  Typically I have found with those that I deal with politically the more active you are, the more you demand.  Yet lets not get stuck here just yet either.. there is another bridge I would like to cross with this very same idea.

At what point through this political nightmare we have been living in is there enough pain for conservatives to actually stand up and do something?  I am not talking about a tea party.  Yeah its a great rally but it accomplishes nothing in real terms.  I am speaking directly to your local area, your city, county and state level.  Here is why I ask this very important question.  While we are the conservatives of America, the reason why our conservative status is the way it is... well.. we failed.  Too many sat back and became the silent majority and now most of them are semi-silent.  They went to a tea party, got a few pictures taken and went "Already taxed enough" and so on.  They then work with their online 9-12 groups or other conservative groups to create this idea of changing the system.  My problem with it all is a matter of perhaps, too little, to late.

For those that continue to stick to a strict party line, they may find they have a hand in the destruction of our nation rather than its restoration.  We have a unique ability in this United States of America to have a revolution every four years, quite literally, yet its via a ballot box.  When I look at the government now, its unlike any other time in history.  Every part has managed to be compromised despite all of the work the founders did in setting the checks and balances which were supposed to stop this kind of madness.  Yet if we do not use the ballot box a our form of revolution, we may indeed find ourselves within a civil war.

I decided some time ago to forget the party, and vote the man.  I am a conservative, yet if the man does not merit my vote, I will not give it.  My reason is, I am tired of the game.  If I am to change the game then two things must happen.  First I must get involved.  Secondly, I must quit playing the game they want me to play which is the lesser of the two evils.  I can fully understand someone claiming that is the only choice they have, yet that also tells me much more about the individual.  For starters they are not as active locally as they should be, if at all.

I hear so many symptomatic woe is me syndromes on the street and online its even more disgusting.  Yet most all conservatives refuse to do two things... 1. Really get involved and then 2. They refuse to quit playing their game.

I worked in a variety of fields within the military and as a civilian contractor.  I have seen the work of insurgents and counter insurgency.  I have seen men fight for the freedom that we do not take seriously enough despite the fact it is evaporating in front of our very eyes.  Revolutions are won from the ground up, not the top down.  I just wonder how long until conservatives in America actually start fighting for their freedom in a revolution of the ballot box from the ground up once again.  I am certainly afraid that if they do not start NOW, they may find themselves fighting for their very lives.

Well said Sir.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #197 on: January 02, 2010, 11:09:25 PM »
Quote
I am certainly afraid that if they do not start NOW, they may find themselves fighting for their very lives.


IMHO it is already too late to prevent that from happening. 

It's no longer a matter of "if", it is merely a matter of "when".

I hope like hell that I am wrong.
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19742
  • Reputation: +1491/-100
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #198 on: January 03, 2010, 06:44:11 AM »
A couple of hypotheticals just so everyone can really think about voting and consequences.

1) Your Senator is Ben Nelson and while considered a moderate or even conservative among dems he is definitely as Frank as said a democrat.
I have no idea about the Republican that ran against him last time but for this exercise will stipulate that there was philosophically little difference or the least was a carbon copy of McCain.
Pleasant choice right?

In light of what we just had happen what was the best option to take in that election?

2) In 2012 we have a reawakening of conservative ideals and the Republican party puts forth a national slate of solid conservatives for President and Congress,as close to perfect in ideology as could be realistically hoped for.
One of the party platforms is recognizing that Social Security is a broken system but going beyond that not a proper role or function of government.
Therefor they call for the complete dismantling of it with whatever funds are there going to meet the payouts promised to everyone currently 60 (or whatever actual age would be projected) and older.
Everyone else will keep the 14% now going into the system but what they have paid in to this point is unfortunately gone.
The overall betterment of our society from not having the tax burden or a dependence on a government system for a "retirement" being a larger issue.

Do you vote for that slate?

Just for fun and hopefully will be a little thought provoking.

Offline formerlurker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9692
  • Reputation: +801/-833
Re: Why vote GOP back in?
« Reply #199 on: January 03, 2010, 07:05:25 AM »
I don't know how old you are, but for a more recent treck down memory lane we will make a pit stop at the Jimmy Carter years:

Quote
* President Jimmy Carter invited Robert Mugabe to the White House in 1980 and fully supported this dictator's rise to power in Rhodesia. Moderate black Bishop Abel Muzorewa had been elected to the post of prime minister. However, President Carter with the support of the world press succeeded in declaring the election null and void. Mugabe, an avowed Marxist, was elected in a second election. The totals of the Zimbabwe disaster under Mugabe are still being tallied: 70 percent unemployment, a total dictatorship, the displacing of productive white farmers and the resulting destruction of productive farms, an exodus of three million Zimbabweans from the country.

* Jimmy Carter has shown a special dedication to the cause of leftist dictators in Central America. He used the full power of the office to undermine and set the stage for the overthrow of the duly elected Anastasio Somosa in Nicaragua, to be replaced by the Marxist Sandanista Daniel Ortega. No matter that the Somosa election had been certified by the OAS. He continues to offer moral support for Marxist dictators Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez.

* The Iran hostage crisis occurred under Jimmy Carter's watch. From Nov. 4, 1979 until Jan. 20, 1981 some 66 Americans were taken hostage and held in the American Embassy in Teheran. They were released within hours of President Ronald Reagan's swearing in ceremony. Just prior to his inauguration, President Reagan was asked if perhaps the captors should wait until he became president so as to make a better deal for the captives release. Reagan replied, "That would be foolish."

* Ex-President Jimmy Carter has been instrumental in the rise to power of Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Hugo Chavez was saved from recall by the voters in Venezuela in 2004 with Carter "monitoring" the election. The election was suspicious on many fronts. The exit polls conducted by an independent New York poling firm declared one half hour before the polls closed that Chavez had been defeated. When the official results were announced, Chavez was declared the winner by nearly the exact opposite percentages as the independent poll had determined. Jimmy Carter certified the Chavez victory anyway. Chavez has shown himself to be a continual hater of the United States.

* One of the most serious threats to global security is the nuclear threat posed by Marxist dictator Kim Jung Il of North Korea. In 1994, without governmental authority, Jimmy Carter went to North Korea and brokered a deal with Kim Jung Il that was supposed to keep that rogue state from attaining nuclear weapons. Jimmy's "negotiation" called for the United States to provide the North Koreans with $4 billion worth of light water reactors and $100 million in oil in exchange for a promise not to develop weapons plus assurances that inspectors would be allowed in. On Aug. 28, 2003 North Korea announced that it possessed nuclear weapons.

*Perhaps the most egregious and far reaching of the Jimmy Carter failures was his bringing down of the Shah of Iran in 1979, to be replaced by radical Muslim cleric Ayatollah Khomeini. The history of Iran is such that a secular government friendly to both the West and their trading partners along the ancient trade routes, such as India and China, had been an important stabilizing element in Mid-east politics for centuries. Jimmy Carter pressured the Shah, a longtime friend of the United States, to leave Iran. Then he denied him asylum and medical treatment. At the same time he supported the fundamentalist Mullahs who opposed the Shah. A religious revolution followed and the rise of Muslim fundamentalism had begun in the Middle East. The terrorism and overall unrest that plagues the world today can be properly traced to this specific failure of the Jimmy Carter presidency.

http://209.157.64.201/%5Ehttp://www.freelancenews.com/opinion/contentview.asp?c=179717

Quote
Exactly what was Jimmy Carter’s biggest failure?

Carter screwed us with the DoE, but there’s more.

*Carter’s July 15, 1979 Malaise speech when he showed us he was out of hope and ideas and but full of self pity.

*Giving away the Panama Canal or asking his 13 year old daughter for advice on nuclear warfare and being stupid enough to quote her.

*What about the Department of Education? Bureaucrats referred to it as “E.D”, an abbreviation which has another meaning today, but might very well apply to the Department of Education as well.

*Maybe it was the endless gas lines.

*Carter gave us: 13.5% inflation; 21.5% prime rates and home mortgage rates of 14.7%; high unemployment and a jaw dropping 33% poverty rate! He delivered lower disposable income rates for every income quintile.

*Maybe it was the shameful self debasement Carter displayed when he accepted a Nobel Peace Prize as a way to embarrass George W. Bush America’s serving President. He joined Euro-trash socialists in mocking and attacking Bush on foreign soil during wartime in return for a “prize” he didn’t deserve.

The Department of Energy (DoE) Carter’s worst failure

The incomprehensible DoE mission statement would be funny if it weren’t so infuriating. It says nothing about lowering energy prices, its original assignment. Today nobody knows what it does only that it doesn’t lower oil prices.

Now Industry experts are talking about possible $300.00 oil. The DoE was created to lower our dependence on foreign oil, but today we use 45% more than when Carter started it. DoE’s 15,000 workers “need” $24 billion a year to complete its mystery assignment, yet it gives us nothing in return.

Carter’s worst damage is the DoE. It never produced anything but wasted the time and money needed to achieve American energy independent.

http://collinsreport.net/


There is so much out there on Jimmy and his total failures.  Yet here we are, still free, still a Republic and still a super power.  Before we get all chicken little, remember why we are the greatest nation in the world -- "we the people."  The only difference between now and Jimmy's era is today we are the generation of instant news, resulting in more headline readers than anything else.  

What is that old saying.. we need a Democrat in office every now and again to remind the intellectually lazy how important the Republican party is.   Honestly if the Messiah maintains this trajectory the Republicans can throw up Carrot Top as their presidential candidate and win in a landslide.  Since when does substance have ANYTHING to do with who can pull off the win?  

I think that the only way to change things is to start at the local level and work up -- as MSB stated many pages ago.  Until then support the GOP as there really is no other credible option.