« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?  (Read 6233 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hawkgirl

  • Alpha Female
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
  • Reputation: +186/-73
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #25 on: November 12, 2009, 06:25:40 PM »
Quote from: rich_t on November 12, 2009, 06:23:33 PM
Sure there is.  I can even find it in a Websters Dictionary.

Main Entry: ain't
Pronunciation: \ˈānt\
Etymology: contraction of are not
Date: 1749
1 : am not : are not : is not
2 : have not : has not
3 : do not : does not : did not —used in some varieties of Black English



LOL

ain't is still a ghetto word....looks like Webster is dumbing down. :tongue:
Logged

Offline rich_t

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7942
  • Reputation: +386/-429
  • TANSTAAFL
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #26 on: November 12, 2009, 06:42:28 PM »
Quote from: Hawkgirl on November 12, 2009, 06:25:40 PM
ain't is still a ghetto word....looks like Webster is dumbing down. :tongue:

Since the mid 70's anyway.
Logged
"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." --Norman Thomas, 1944

Offline Thor

  • General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!
  • In Memoriam
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13103
  • Reputation: +363/-297
  • Native Texan & US Navy (ret)
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #27 on: November 13, 2009, 12:53:03 PM »
Quote from: Hawkgirl on November 12, 2009, 06:25:40 PM
ain't is still a ghetto word....looks like Webster is dumbing down. :tongue:

Actually, "ain't" ain't a ghetto word. It originated in Southern England.
Quote
1706, originally a contraction of am not, and in proper use with that sense until it began to be used as a generic contraction for are not, is not, etc., in early 19c. Cockney dialect of London, popularized by representations of this in Dickens, etc., which led to the word being banished from correct English.

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=ain%27t

As far as spelling, there is little excuse for improper spelling, IMO. I have Distal Motor Paresis due to my various and assorted spinal cord injuries. I still manage to MOSTLY spell properly. Of course, Firefox has a built in spell check program, of which I often take advantage.
Logged
"The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation."- IBID

I AM your General Ne'er Do Well, Troublemaker & All Around Meanie!!

"Congress has not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but only those specifically enumerated."-Thomas Jefferson

Offline Airwolf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12154
  • Reputation: +909/-163
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #28 on: November 14, 2009, 01:23:55 AM »
With the trolls we have here it's amazing that we don't see more misspellings.
Logged
MOLON LABE

"Someday, when all your civilization and science are likewise swept away, your kind will pray for a man with a sword."-- Conan the Barbarian

Clint Eastwood - Because God wanted Chuck Norris to have nightmares.

"I am not a Number,I am a free man"

"He's my hero, you don't put away your heros, you honor them!"

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #29 on: November 14, 2009, 08:19:34 AM »
Quote from: Airwolf on November 14, 2009, 01:23:55 AM
With the trolls we have here it's amazing that we don't see more misspellings.

Well, really now that you mention it, most of them have been crappy spellers, which helps to set them apart right off the bat.
Logged
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Crazy Horse

  • Army 0 Navy 34
  • Topic Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5602
  • Reputation: +265/-143
  • Sex, Booze and Bacon Minion
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #30 on: November 14, 2009, 12:00:08 PM »
Quote from: Thor on November 13, 2009, 12:53:03 PM
Actually, "ain't" ain't a ghetto word. It originated in Southern England.
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=ain%27t

As far as spelling, there is little excuse for improper spelling, IMO. I have Distal Motor Paresis due to my various and assorted spinal cord injuries. I still manage to MOSTLY spell properly. Of course, Firefox has a built in spell check program, of which I often take advantage.

Do you really use it alot?
Logged
Disclaimer
Any views, remarks or statements of other military services or it’s members is covered under the Inter-Service Rivalry Act of 1974

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #31 on: November 14, 2009, 04:10:29 PM »
Quote from: Crazy Horse on November 14, 2009, 12:00:08 PM
Do you really use it alot?

I use it when speaking, somewhat, but I don't think I've used the word "ain't" on a message board, email or anything written.
Logged

Offline Eupher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24894
  • Reputation: +2835/-1828
  • U.S. Army, Retired
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #32 on: November 14, 2009, 09:23:06 PM »
I have absolutely no problem with using the word "ain't" in casual conversation and on message boards, considering the casual nature of both methods of communication.

No way would I use the word in formal reports or formal speech.

Since we're talking about questionable words, the word "irregardless" makes my blood run cold. I hear that word fairly often and I cringe when I do.
Logged
Adams E2 Euphonium, built in 2017
Boosey & Co. Imperial Euphonium, built in 1941
Edwards B454 bass trombone, built 2012
Bach Stradivarius 42OG tenor trombone, built 1992
Kanstul 33-T BBb tuba, built 2011
Fender Precision Bass Guitar, built ?
Mouthpiece data provided on request.

Offline Hawkgirl

  • Alpha Female
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4291
  • Reputation: +186/-73
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #33 on: November 14, 2009, 09:30:36 PM »
I only use the word ain't when I'm trying to be funny....like "you ain't got nothing on me hunny..." 2 snaps and a head bunt.
Logged

Offline Splashdown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6729
  • Reputation: +475/-100
  • Out of 9 lives, I spent 7
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #34 on: November 15, 2009, 06:23:01 AM »
Quote from: Eupher on November 14, 2009, 09:23:06 PM
I have absolutely no problem with using the word "ain't" in casual conversation and on message boards, considering the casual nature of both methods of communication.

No way would I use the word in formal reports or formal speech.

Since we're talking about questionable words, the word "irregardless" makes my blood run cold. I hear that word fairly often and I cringe when I do.

I just don't get "could/should/would of." That's the one that makes me weep for this language.


Logged
Let nothing trouble you,
Let nothing frighten you. 
All things are passing;
God never changes.
Patience attains all that it strives for.
He who has God lacks nothing:
God alone suffices.
--St. Theresa of Avila



"No crushed ice; no peas." -- Undies

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Is it wrong to direct someone to the spell check?
« Reply #35 on: November 15, 2009, 06:45:53 AM »
Quote from: Splashdown on November 15, 2009, 06:23:01 AM
I just don't get "could/should/would of." That's the one that makes me weep for this language.




I think it came from a bastardization of the contractive forms of the words: would've , should've, could've . They sound like would of, etc when spoken.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »