Okay, let me see if I understand. One of these ungrateful jerks is upset because they're only going to have THREE health insurance options. One of the other ones is pissed because deceptive union negotiations prevented them from getting any kind of raise or bonus (welcome to real life during a recession) which is somehow tied to how much the CEO makes. As an aside, I wonder how much those union CEO's make.
We have 10% unemployment, closer to 20% if you count those who've just given up and one of these idiots is upset about not having a cornucopia of insurance choices (we have 2 choices, an HMO and a PPO) which might just mean the company can keep a few more people employed, but that's not important right now. What's important is the DUmmie MUST have2 a poker hand full of choices even if co-workers lose their jobs OR premium-single-payer-government-run-that-will-pay-for-absolutely-everything-every-moonbat-thinks-should-be-covered-and-only-paid-for-by-evil-ceo's-corporations-and-especially-oil-companies.
Another is pissed because even though her spouse HAS a job when so many others don't this selfish bitch's husband isn't getting a raise or bonus. Yeah, the party of compassion there. Amazing how they only want to help those in need but when it comes to talking about an issue, they only manage to moan and complain about how it affects their selfish, self-centered, self-important pissy little lives. Neither of these is an argument for government health care, especially the one upset about a lack of options. Seems that's more an argument AGAINST government involvement. Tell you what, you DUmmies and your congressional reps can try your way first. When my senators sign up, then I'll consider it, until then, you keep your public option and I'll work on being able to buy insurance across state lines.
Cindie