Author Topic: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats  (Read 1795 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x5045944

Oh my.

Quote
AzDar  (1000+ posts)      Fri Feb-13-09 02:39 PM
Original message
 
Anyone know which House 'Dems' voted against the stim?

Because they suck...

Quote
cliffordu  (1000+ posts)        Fri Feb-13-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
 
1. Look for the chapped lips. All the dinos have them from booty smooching the R$epubs.

Quote
47of74  (783 posts)      Fri Feb-13-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
 
8. What residents of those districts with the DINOs need to do now...

They need to find someone to mount primary challenges to every Democrat who voted against this.

I dunno.

I suspect that 18 months from now, every Democrat who voted for it's going to have a primary challenge.

How do you like them apples?

Quote
no_hypocrisy  (1000+ posts)      Fri Feb-13-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
 
2. Wonder how Dennis Kucinich voted . . . If he voted "no", it would be because the Plan didn't go far enough.

Kucinich also voted for impeachment of the Impeached One in 1998, in case any primitive's forgotten.

Quote
Tierra_y_Libertad  (1000+ posts)        Fri Feb-13-09 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
 
3. DeFazio for one. And, he certainly doesn't "suck".

Quote
bdamomma  (1000+ posts)     Fri Feb-13-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #3

5. what was DeFazio reason for voting no.

did it not go far enough for him. I remember seeing him on Rachel what did he want more money for infrastructure.

Quote
Tierra_y_Libertad  (1000+ posts)        Fri Feb-13-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
 
6. I don't know, but assume, that's the reason.

Isn't DeFazio pretty old now?

Quote
4lbs (1000+ posts)      Fri Feb-13-09 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
 
7. Here are the 7 House Democrats that voted NAY

NOTE: 6 of them also voted NAY on the original H.R. 1 several weeks ago.

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll070.xml

Bright, Bobby (D-AK)
DeFazio, Peter (D-OR) (New NAY vote. Voted YEA on H.R. 1 two weeks ago)
Griffith, Parker (D-AK)
Minnick, Walter (D-ID)
Peterson, Collin (D-MN)
Shuler, Heath (D-NC)
Taylor, Gene (D-MS)
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17752
  • Reputation: +1895/-81
Re: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2009, 02:08:24 PM »
Well, OK, if that's true that DiFazio wanted more infrastructure, I could go along with that.  Because, given the choice between what may become a mini-big-dig a few years from now, or saving Nancy's marshrat, I'd go with the dig.  Not completely unreasonable. 


Offline blitzkrieg_17

  • The harder they come, the harder they fall
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
  • Reputation: +126/-69
Re: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2009, 02:13:26 PM »
If the above dems, especially the southern ones, lose the primaries, the seats will just go back to us.
Caught somewhere in time

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2009, 02:17:06 PM »
If the above dems, especially the southern ones, lose the primaries, the seats will just go back to us.

Are you kidding, sir?

Eighteen months from now all those Democrats excepting for the aged DeFazio are going to be shoo-ins for re-election.

I have serious doubts about all the other Democrats, though.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline blitzkrieg_17

  • The harder they come, the harder they fall
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1880
  • Reputation: +126/-69
Re: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2009, 02:21:19 PM »
Bright replaced the retiring GOPer Terry Everett in AL. He needs to keep his seat, and he knows what he has to do to keep it. If he is beaten by a more liberal Dem, the party loses.
Caught somewhere in time

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2009, 03:19:12 PM »
Are you kidding, sir?

Eighteen months from now all those Democrats excepting for the aged DeFazio are going to be shoo-ins for re-election.

I have serious doubts about all the other Democrats, though.

Not at all a lock, Frank, the primaries are a whole other ballgame, after all.  Think Liebermann and Connecticut; often weird and stupid crap that plays well with the committed Democrats gets the sane one dropped in the primary, but then works against the moonbat Dem candidate in the general election later.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline jukin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16230
  • Reputation: +2114/-170
Re: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2009, 03:34:37 PM »
So now dissent is not patriotic?

GET OUT OF TOWN!!
When you are the beneficiary of someone’s kindness and generosity, it produces a sense of gratitude and community.

When you are the beneficiary of a policy that steals from someone and gives it to you in return for your vote, it produces a sense of entitlement and dependency.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2009, 04:20:59 PM »
Not at all a lock, Frank, the primaries are a whole other ballgame, after all.  Think Liebermann and Connecticut; often weird and stupid crap that plays well with the committed Democrats gets the sane one dropped in the primary, but then works against the moonbat Dem candidate in the general election later.

Four of the six are Blue Dogs, IIRC.  I know that Heath Shuler is.  He's rapidly becoming as despised among the Dem leadership as Jim Trafficant was.  Shuler went after both Pelosi and Dingy, Harry Reid in the run-ups to the original vote.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline delilahmused

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7384
  • Reputation: +1367/-80
  • Devil Mom
Re: primitives unsheathing torches, pitchforks, for renegade Democrats
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2009, 12:02:53 PM »
Well, OK, if that's true that DiFazio wanted more infrastructure, I could go along with that.  Because, given the choice between what may become a mini-big-dig a few years from now, or saving Nancy's marshrat, I'd go with the dig.  Not completely unreasonable. 



No I don't think the little prick voted against it because it didn't go far enough. He's such a socialist he'd vote for just about anything that gave the government more money and control. Some of us have been trying to vote him out for years. One guy who had a decent chance once he got his name out for a few campaign seasons (DiFazio's pretty entrenched here) was recalled for guard duty. My son took a homeland security class from him in college. Great guy. Former FBI. Left the bureau when Portland refused to cooperate in actively capturing terrorists. It would take a while (unless DiFazio retires) I think but it could be done. With the exception of Eugene (and it's a biggie), his district is pretty rural and there's lots of conservatives here. Heck, our little grocery store still puts a lighted Mary, Jesus, and Joseph right out front every Christmas and there isn't an ACLU lawyer in sight.

Cindie
"If God built me a ladder to heaven, I would climb it and elbow drop the world."
Mick Foley

"I am a very good shot. I have hunted for every kind of animal. But I would never kill an animal during mating season."
Hedy Lamarr

"I'm just like any modern woman trying to have it all. Loving husband, a family. It's just, I wish I had more time to seek out the dark forces and join their hellish crusade."
Morticia Addams