Worth Knowing, Probably Not Quite Threadworthy 9/6

[SVPete]

Trump Was Right About the Kennedy Center... In a HUGE Way!

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/09/05/trump-was-right-about-the-kennedy-center-n4956928

President Donald Trump has spent months trying to return the Kennedy Center to its former glory, and leftists have been trying to stop him at every turn. This week, the building did their work for them. A chunk of the Grand Foyer ceiling came crashing down onto the red carpet.

I’m guessing that’s still not enough proof for Democrats that the place needs work.

The collapse hit overnight into Thursday, after a powerful storm tore through Washington, D.C. Meteorologists say it was the strongest system to hit the city since the derecho that flattened trees and power lines back in 2012. This time, it took out part of the ceiling in one of the Kennedy Center's most recognizable rooms, leaving debris scattered across the carpet where donors and dignitaries usually walk.
...
Last month, Justice Department lawyers told a federal court that the building's "dangerously dilapidated, outdated, and decrepit" condition, combined with millions of dollars in financial losses, has put the Kennedy Center in a "financial and structural death spiral." Fixing it, they said, will take two years of closure. Without that work, they warned, "the Center will deteriorate further into an unsafe, decrepit structure that will be required to be taken down, with a determination to follow on what to build on the site, such as a large outdoor amphitheater overlooking the Potomac River that has been proposed, by some, for many years."

While the the noise is being made about adding Trump's name to the Kennedy Center, his effort to repair and refurbish it are also being obstructed. I think the chances are 50-50 or worse that this incident will clear opposition to Bogey-Trump carrying out necessary repairs and needed upgrades.

[SVPete]

S&P 100 Drops Nike: Formerly Disruptive Shoe Company Is Now Out of Fashion

https://pjmedia.com/tim-o-brien/2026/09/06/s-and-p-100-delists-nike-formerly-disruptive-shoe-company-is-now-out-of-fashion-n4956942

In a sign of the changing times, the S&P 100 is delisting Nike. To reiterate, the S&P 100 – not the S&P 500 – is delisting Nike, which is a reflection of the company’s poor performance on Wall Street and elsewhere. If you want to buy a share of the stock these days, it’s floundering around $38 to $40 per share, which is as low as it’s been in about 12 years. The delisting will take effect Sept. 21.

That’s a 75% drop from its peak in 2021. So, what gives?

Let’s explore the official reasons (excuses) first. Analysts say that Nike has encountered a perfect storm of stagnant sales growth, “shrinking gross margins,” and problems in China, where its shoes are manufactured and which represents a huge consumer market for the firm. But these aren’t reasons; they’re symptoms. Saying your stock is down because sales are down is like saying the reason I’m hungry is because I haven’t eaten any food.
...
Nike is as much a fashion brand as an athletic performance shoe company. Things go in and out of fashion every day as fickle consumers’ tastes change. For the longest time, just having that Nike swoosh logo on a shirt or a hat or your shoes was enough to signal that you’re on trend, that you buy a certain quality, and that you maintain a certain image.

This branding was reinforced by Nike's status as the dominant sponsor of the major pro athletes in sports. From Tiger Woods to Michael Jordan, if you were a pro athlete, you weren’t “somebody” until you got that Nike shoe contract.

I do not have the knowledge/visibility to make definitive statements, but within my scope of observation:

1. Among brands I see at running events - organized trail and community street/road - the brands I currently see most often are Hoka and Saucony. Nike is in the lower pack with New Balance, Adidas, and On.

2. The brands I see most often at work (200 or 400 work in my building), I see Hoka most often, with New Balance and Nike vying for second most common.

Fifteen years or so ago (when I started walking in running events), Nike was most common in both contexts. Whatever the mix of reaction against Nike's embrace of activists and waves of fashion, Nike's Marketing Mojo has slipped. FWIW, Caitlin Clark has a Nike contract, and Sophie Cunningham an Adidas contract.

I've had very good experiences with the Hoka Clifton series, though my bank account and feet are good with New Balance 680 and 880 (both are "Fresh Foam" series) for daily wear and for work-outs and events.

[SVPete]

ICE Captures MS-13 Killer Known As 'The Witch.' A Biden Judge Just Let Him Go.

https://redstate.com/kyle-becker/2026/09/05/ice-captures-ms-13-killer-known-as-the-witch-a-biden-judge-just-let-him-go-n2206565

ICE spent months tracking down an MS-13 gang member known as “The Witch,” a convicted killer wanted in El Salvador for an execution-style murder.

Now, ICE has been forced to set him free.

U.S. District Judge Jinsook Ohta, a Biden appointee in California, ordered David Antonio Aviles Perez released from ICE custody after concluding that immigration authorities violated his due-process rights.

Judge Ohta ruled that ICE erred by holding him for five months without an individualized determination of whether he posed a danger to the public or was likely to flee.

The family of his next victims should be allowed to sue this moron for wrongful death.

[SVPete]

Court Rules Pentagon Can Fire Stars and Stripes Journalists

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/court-rules-pentagon-can-fire-stars-and-stripes-journalists-6083868

A district court denied a motion from three Stars and Stripes journalists that sought to block the Department of War from firing them.

While plaintiffs argue that the terminations “violate their First Amendment rights to communicate as citizens on matters of public concern,” such rights have “some limitations” when applied to people employed in public service, Judge Trevor N. McFadden, from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, said in the Sept. 4 order.

“When government employees provide public commentary in their official capacity, their speech is government speech, and the First Amendment does not apply,” the judge said, adding that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated any “irreparable harm.”
...
On July 5, Korte and Slavin gave interviews to CBS News. The program discussed changes to Pentagon regulations governing Stars and Stripes and their impact on its independence.

Korte said that restrictions may come on her reporting. “I’m working for Stars and Stripes … not for the Pentagon, not for any administration, not for any policymaker. I’m here to cover the military community,” she said.

Ordinarily I'd say that being fired for cause by Trump would be a resume' item for a "journalist", but the job market for "journalists" is not very good, currently.