That's one, big, kinda loud misdirect.
Incorrect. you just see it as one. There is a difference.
What about these receipts from my article?
Mere speculation based on obvious ideological bent.
Besides all that, so they have the receipts. So what?
If you don't care what is in fact true and what is not in fact true, why are you bothering at all? Why then, are you here?
I bet someone out there has the receipts from when Clinton balanced the budget and Obama ended the recession.
You don't understand, apparently, the difference between empirical truth and fact, and blatant spin. That's a YOU problem, not an everyone else problem.
I bet you were quick to remind everyone that the e-commerce bubble added a lot of revenue to the Clinton era federal budget. I bet you were quick to remind people recessions are historically cyclical regardless of whether or not the government intervenes.
How much would you like to bet on that, and are you able to pay when you lose?
Now all of a sudden you play like you're naive enough to think it was all the President's doing?
The wrong tree. You're barking up it.
How do you answer the charge that the national economy is well studied and anyone who can hire a competent cabinet could plug in conservative solutions?
By pointing out that there is a world of difference between 'could' and WOULD. Furthermore, you say "well studied", and ignore that all those who allegedly 'well studied' it said Trump would crash the economy and tarrifs wouldn't work, and were wrong. DEAD WRONG. We had the barnstorming economy during the Trump years, not because of what he *could do* or *might do*, but because of what he *DID* do, which most so-called conservative politicians (uniparty stooges) did not agree with. Mainstream (read:UNIPARTY) "conservative" governance is no better for you economically than leftist governance, it just takes longer to hurt you.
Would you mind telling us what the wall is good for if the guy in charge makes no effort to sell the idea to the people and even undermines himself with nastiness and an ambiguous response to racism and fascism?
Who is "us"? You don't speak for anyone here, and your views certainly don't represent any maga sized number of people at large. The reason you see no effort to sell the wall, is because you're a lefty and you don't watch Trump speeches or rallys, and you know only what you see in mainstream misleadia chosen soundbytes. You suffer from what almost all leftys suffer from - you are ignorant of what you don't know.
That nastiness you think undermines him, *I* appreciate. So do tens of millions of mainstream Americans. Ambiuous response to racism and fascism? Being nasty back IS the right response. Unless you're a wimp who wants to be represented by a wimp, or you are someone who would prefer conservative types be represented by a wimp. Either way: NO THANKS.
There is a 99.9 percent chance that you're a DUer, and a .1 percent chance that you aren't one but are just as dumb as one. If you're a .1 percenter, like I said: Go educate yourself to reality at the treehouse. Truth will set you free from some very sad misconceptions which you are obviously suffering from. If not, go back to DU.