Author Topic: YOU’RE FIRED! Trump’s VA Terminates 500, Suspends 200 For Misconduct  (Read 3475 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HAPPY2BME

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5617
  • Reputation: +100/-231
  • For The People And By The People

Five hundred and forty-eight Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) employees have been terminated since President Donald Trump took office, indicating that his campaign pledge to clean up “probably the most incompetently run agency in the United States” by relentlessly putting his TV catch phrase “you’re fired” into action was more than just empty rhetoric.

Another 200 VA workers were suspended and 33 demoted, according to data newly published by the department as part of VA Secretary David Shulkin’s commitment to greater transparency. Those disciplined include 22 senior leaders, more than 70 nurses, 14 police officers, and 25 physicians.

Also disciplined were a program analyst dealing with the Government Accountability Office, which audits the department, a public affairs specialist, a chief of police and a chief of surgery.

Many housekeeping aides and food service workers — lower-level jobs in which the department has employed felons and convicted sex offenders — were also fired.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/09/youre-fired-trumps-va-terminates-500-suspends-200-for-misconduct/

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Good.

There's plenty of decent and civilized people who can use those jobs.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline docstew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4741
  • Reputation: +282/-187
  • My Wife is awesome!
First I'd prefer that they determine if those jobs are even necessary...

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
First I'd prefer that they determine if those jobs are even necessary...

I like your approach.
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
First I'd prefer that they determine if those jobs are even necessary...

Not just that.  Since 2001, the DVA budget has QUADRUPLED.  Now I ask you, is this because of the Iraq/Afghanistan vets?  Hardly.  In fact, they account for about 5 percent of the increase.  Military retirees?  Not so much, considering how many use TRICARE.  Even service-connected disability is not as prevalent as one might think.

WWII/Korea vets?  Some, but most of the WWII vets are gone, as are many, if not most Korea-era vets.

Vietnam?  Certainly, considering even the youngest Vietnam-era vets are now in their 60's.  This is the bulk of the burden, but even so, with 3 million VN-era vets, not all of whom use VA services.

Bottom line--we're throwing more and more money at a shrinking veteran population.  Why?  And really, how much of it is going to the vets, and how much is going to an ever-bloated bureaucracy?
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline HAPPY2BME

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5617
  • Reputation: +100/-231
  • For The People And By The People
Bottom line--we're throwing more and more money at a shrinking veteran population.  Why?  And really, how much of it is going to the vets, and how much is going to an ever-bloated bureaucracy?

======================

Most of that money is going to the VA bureaucracy, which has outlived its purpose.

Do away with the VA entirely and just send Disabled Veterans into the private sector for health care.  Much better care, much less cost.  Trump has even suggested this.

Offline Old n Grumpy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9603
  • Reputation: +2119/-13
It definatly time to root out the bad apples and to remove the bloat from all the govt agencies. President Trump is really doing what he promised. :cheersmate: :cheersmate: :cheersmate:
Life is tough and it’s even tougher when you’re stupid

Basking in the glow of my white Privilege and toxic masculinity while I water the Begonias with liberal tears!

I will give up my guns when the liberals give up their illegal aliens

We need a Bull Shit tax to make the Democrats go broke!

Offline docstew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4741
  • Reputation: +282/-187
  • My Wife is awesome!
======================

Most of that money is going to the VA bureaucracy, which has outlived its purpose.

Do away with the VA entirely and just send Disabled Veterans into the private sector for health care.  Much better care, much less cost.  Trump has even suggested this.

There's three main programs that the VA coordinates: Healthcare (obviously), GI Bill, and VA Mortgage assistance. Healthcare is the only one of the three that has direct responsibility for providing the service; for the other two, it's just an eligibility verification and/or payment of set amount of funds. That's the model they should go to for all services, if not folding the Dept entirely and absorbing the services back under DoD.