First I'd prefer that they determine if those jobs are even necessary...
Not just that. Since 2001, the DVA budget has QUADRUPLED. Now I ask you, is this because of the Iraq/Afghanistan vets? Hardly. In fact, they account for about 5 percent of the increase. Military retirees? Not so much, considering how many use TRICARE. Even service-connected disability is not as prevalent as one might think.
WWII/Korea vets? Some, but most of the WWII vets are gone, as are many, if not most Korea-era vets.
Vietnam? Certainly, considering even the youngest Vietnam-era vets are now in their 60's. This is the bulk of the burden, but even so, with 3 million VN-era vets, not all of whom use VA services.
Bottom line--we're throwing more and more money at a shrinking veteran population. Why? And really, how much of it is going to the vets, and how much is going to an ever-bloated bureaucracy?