Author Topic: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'  (Read 4555 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19839
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« on: December 08, 2015, 05:12:50 PM »
This would have gotten 200 replies a week ago.
Lazy DUmbfuks.

Quote
Tue Dec 8, 2015, 12:05 PM

Star Member aikoaiko (22,981 posts)

Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'


Quote
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amitai-etzioni/needed-domestic-disarmame_b_8739712.html

Advocates of gun control frequently cite the much lower levels of gun violence in other developed nations -- such as Canada and the UK -- in support of the measures they promote. However, these very low levels of gun violence have not been achieved by gun control but -- by domestic disarmament.

Most people have no guns in these fully democratic nations and have no way of getting them, legally or otherwise. It is hence at best naïve, sometimes disingenuous, to imply that if several gun control measure would be enacted -- and somehow enforced -- the U.S. would gain what these other nations take for granted. (By the way, Black Lives Matters may wish to take note: In these blessed nations most cops, most of the time, have no guns either.)

Given that even micro gun control measures will be effectively blocked by the NRA and its allies, and that promoting mini measures as potentially effective is misleading, progressives may as well go for the big enchilada: Call for domestic disarmament.


Domestic Disarmament!!!111!!!!!!

Quote
Response to aikoaiko (Original post)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:49 PM

beevul (10,451 posts)
2. Nobody wants to take anyones guns.


Quote
Response to beevul (Reply #2)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:57 PM

Chan790 (18,610 posts)
3. I'm proud to say it, Beevul.

I want to take your guns.

I've given some thought, I think legal change is unrealistic. We need social change.

I mean, let's be honest...guns are for assholes. We can and should make gun-ownership a pariah act--whether it remains legal or not. It's worked so well for smoking. Only assholes would own a gun. Only the National Rifle Assholes would advocate against sensible gun policy.

Guns: it's assholes all the way down.

You will die early,that is the reality you mooks pretend does not exist.

Quote
Response to Chan790 (Reply #3)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:08 PM

MohRokTah (10,829 posts)
5. The only pariahs are the grabbers.

It'll stay that way, too.

The more you tell people they have to give up something they have, the more they will fight you and convince othre people to join them.

Quote
Response to MohRokTah (Reply #5)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:20 PM

Gormy Cuss (30,515 posts)
7. Nah, gun humpers are pariahs too.

The rest of us just want the country to move forward, away from this insane interpretation of 2A as "no restrictions on ownership." IMHO the issue isn't how many or which weapons one owns, it's how they're used or intended for use. What we need is a change in gun culture, say back to the mid-20th century when most people had guns for sport rather than for self-protection against "those people."

Quote
Response to Chan790 (Reply #3)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:10 PM

clarice (3,453 posts)
6. Until your house gets robbed....who ya gonna call? nt

Quote
Response to clarice (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:32 PM

Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. The police.

File a report. Wait for the insurance check to arrive. It's only stuff.

Oh you mean if I catch him in my house? The police. I have a safe room.

Oh...you mean if my life is in danger? The police. I'm going to need to file a report after I kill him with my bear hands. (That's a pun, not a typo. I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.) Also, I own a crossbow. Advantage in a small space? Me. 9" bolts with barbed mechanical broadheads do a ****-load more damage than anything smaller than a 50-cal. and are mostly silent. It's just a shitty choice to shoot up a Christmas party with because the reload time between shots is ~6s.

This will be you

Quote
Response to MohRokTah (Reply #12)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 03:08 PM

Chan790 (18,610 posts)
13. If the intruder is armed...I'm hiding in the safe room unless I have no choice.

Why? Because I am not a *******ed idiot. But if I am compelled to confront them by necessity or circumstance, they're going to be getting more than they bargain for because I'm not going down without a fight, not-immediately-fatal bullet-wound or not.

 :badass:

Boring.

Offline thundley4

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 40571
  • Reputation: +2224/-127
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2015, 05:29:21 PM »
Quote
(By the way, Black Lives Matters may wish to take note: In these blessed nations most cops, most of the time, have no guns either.)

You may wish to consider that most of those countries have fewer minorities than DU has.

Offline freedumb2003b

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6055
  • Reputation: +824/-72
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2015, 05:53:17 PM »
Quote
Response to clarice (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:32 PM

Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. The police.

File a report. Wait for the insurance check to arrive. It's only stuff.

Oh you mean if I catch him in my house? The police. I have a safe room.

Oh...you mean if my life is in danger? The police. I'm going to need to file a report after I kill him with my bear hands. (That's a pun, not a typo. I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.) Also, I own a crossbow. Advantage in a small space? Me. 9" bolts with barbed mechanical broadheads do a ****-load more damage than anything smaller than a 50-cal. and are mostly silent. It's just a shitty choice to shoot up a Christmas party with because the reload time between shots is ~6s.

In a small space, advantage: real gun.  Your supposed size (yeah, we believe you) and complicated, clumsy medieval toy will fall to even a .22 in  under a second.  Bang!  you're dead.

 
Measure with a micrometer, mark with chalk, cut with an ax

Hello to the Baizuo lurkers from DU, DI, JPR and Huffpo

DUmmies can no more understand the "Cave" than a rat can understand a thunderbolt, but they fear it just the same. Fear the "Cave", DUmmies. Fear it well. Big Dog 12-Jan-2015

Proud charter member of the Death Squad Hate Force! https://conservativecave.com/home/index.php?topic=112331.msg1386168#msg1386168

Ted Kennedy is the only person with an actual confirmed kill in the war on women.

Offline Patriot Guard Rider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2651
  • Reputation: +650/-18
  • Yes, really. Liberals DO disgust me.
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2015, 06:31:27 PM »
In a small space, advantage: real gun.  Your supposed size (yeah, we believe you) and complicated, clumsy medieval toy will fall to even a .22 in  under a second.  Bang!  you're dead.

If a*shole wants my guns, I'll give it my home address PROVIDED he/she/it shows up alone, no LEO backup, no friends, no nothing, knocks on my door and says hand them over.

Wanna bet how that would work out?
Liberals disgust me. (Now I don't have to remember to put it on each post).

Because only the left goes searching for that which is not there in a desperate attempt to be offended about something.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Many people do not see evil until the gas is flowing into the chamber. That is why they get on the trains in the first place.

Offline Ogre

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1380
  • Reputation: +129/-6
  • What Cat?
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2015, 07:23:07 PM »
What a DUmbass, the Dummy doesn't own a weapon and has no apparent practical experience employing one.

Yet, s/he/it feels qualified to not only participate in a discussion on the subject of weapons, s/he/it knows the best possible solution to a home invasion.

This right here is a prime example of the Nad's effect (just made that up).

The Nad's effect is when one who does not have any theoretical, practical, or academic knowledge or understanding of the problem asserts that their solution to said problem is the best possible.

And the DUmmies wonder why we don't take their advice.



"Don't argue about difficulties. The difficulties will argue for themselves."  - Winston Churchill

"Get some lumber, build a bridge, and get the hell over it" - Unknown

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2015, 11:18:07 PM »
Response to clarice (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:32 PM

Quote
Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. The police.

File a report. Wait for the insurance check to arrive. It's only stuff.

Oh you mean if I catch him in my house? The police. I have a safe room.

Oh...you mean if my life is in danger? The police. I'm going to need to file a report after I kill him with my bear hands. (That's a pun, not a typo. I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.) Also, I own a crossbow. Advantage in a small space? Me. 9" bolts with barbed mechanical broadheads do a ****-load more damage than anything smaller than a 50-cal. and are mostly silent. It's just a shitty choice to shoot up a Christmas party with because the reload time between shots is ~6s.

I see someone has never actually tried to do use a crossbow in a confined space, and has no concept of the mechanisms of mortality in an arrow wound vs. a bullet wound or knife attack.
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2015, 12:25:53 AM »
Chan790 must have bounced back from that devastating job loss a few years ago.

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=63258
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline Tess Anderson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4199
  • Reputation: +2887/-31
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2015, 01:30:01 AM »
Chan790 must have bounced back from that devastating job loss a few years ago.

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=63258

Not really, asshole appears to have left the banking industry altogether.

Offline 98ZJUSMC

  • The Most Deplorable
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8424
  • Reputation: +436/-76
  • Now, with 99% less yellow!
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2015, 02:34:03 AM »
You may wish to consider that most of those countries have fewer minorities than DU has.

Just mention "Switzerland"; and watch them go all stupid in front of your very eyes.  Chuckle, as you inform them that the Euros don't include suicides and the Marxists here, do.  Stare in amazement, as they attempt to process that; removing LA, Chicago. New Orleans and New York from the US stats, lowers us to the 4th LEAST violent nation in the developed world.  Tutor the little infants in the fact that; since their sheep-like confiscation, Australia's violent crime rate has actually increased.

Any more, lurking Romper Roomers or, have you had enough?   :bird: :bird: :bird:

Quote
Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. The police.

File a report. Wait for the insurance check to arrive. It's only stuff.

Oh you mean if I catch him in my house? The police. I have a safe room.   ::)

Oh...you mean if my life is in danger? The police. I'm going to need to file a report after I kill him with my bear hands. (That's a pun, not a typo. I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.) Also, I own a crossbow. Advantage in a small space? Me. 9" bolts with barbed mechanical broadheads do a ****-load more damage than anything smaller than a 50-cal. you're an idiot and are mostly silent. It's just a shitty choice to shoot up a Christmas party with because the reload time between shots is ~6s.

Ummm, no.  There is a reason why crossbows; yes, I know, you have the pistol-type, are not used in house-to-house (MOUT) operations, dickhead.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2015, 02:44:06 AM by 98ZJUSMC »
              

Liberal thinking is a two-legged stool and magical thinking is one of the legs, the other is a combination of self-loating and misanthropy.  To understand it, you would have to be able to sit on that stool while juggling two elephants, an anvil and a fragmentation grenade, sans pin.

"Accuse others of what you do." - Karl Marx

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #9 on: December 09, 2015, 02:59:13 AM »
Lets change a couple things in this post and play what if.

What if instead of guns we took...

Quote
Response to beevul (Reply #2)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 01:57 PM

Chan790 (18,610 posts)
3. I'm proud to say it, Beevul.

I want to take your guns welfare check.

I've given some thought, I think legal change is unrealistic. We need social change.

I mean, let's be honest...guns Food Stamps, TANIF, Section 8 Housing are for assholes. We can and should make gun-ownership welfare use a pariah act--whether it remains legal or not. It's worked so well for smoking. Only assholes would own a gun an EBT card. Only the National Rifle DNC Assholes would advocate against sensible gun monetary policy.

Guns Welfare: it's assholes all the way down.

Change guns to welfare and these ignorant pricks would suddenly cry to the high heavens about how the tyranny of the few was  trampling rights of the majority.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2015, 03:08:02 AM »
Quote
Response to clarice (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:32 PM

Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. The police.

File a report. Wait for the insurance check to arrive. It's only stuff.

It's my stuff I paid for it.  I'll be dammed if I'm going to just let someone take it.  You better hope that you actually spent the money on your homeowners policy to pay the replacement costs and not just cover the value of the item. (I think I said that right).  Given the fact you're a DUmmie I doubt you opted for the extra expense.  On and BTW...depreciation on the value of your items is a real bitch.

Quote
Oh you mean if I catch him in my house? The police. I have a safe room.

*****.

Quote
Oh...you mean if my life is in danger? The police. I'm going to need to file a report after I kill him with my bear hands. (That's a pun, not a typo. I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.)

Yeah right.  Sure you are. :whatever:  If you're that big and ****ing scary why are you going to piss your pants...scream like a school girl and go to a safe room?


Quote
Also, I own a crossbow. Advantage in a small space? Me. 9" bolts with barbed mechanical broadheads do a ****-load more damage than anything smaller than a 50-cal. and are mostly silent. It's just a shitty choice to shoot up a Christmas party with because the reload time between shots is ~6s.

You've been reading too many Dungeons and Dragons graphic novels.  I bet a thug gang banger breaking into your house trying to find $100 worth of shit to pawn for meth or a crack rock can put 5 shots into you from his illegally purchased .380 pistol before you get half way to your crossbow or your safe room.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline RayRaytheSBS

  • "There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
  • Reputation: +200/-13
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2015, 03:57:07 AM »
Quote
Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. The police.

File a report. Wait for the insurance check to arrive. It's only stuff.

Oh you mean if I catch him in my house? The police. I have a safe room.   ::)

Oh...you mean if my life is in danger? The police. I'm going to need to file a report after I kill him with my bear hands. (That's a pun, not a typo. I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.) Also, I own a crossbow. Advantage in a small space? Me. 9" bolts with barbed mechanical broadheads do a ****-load more damage than anything smaller than a 50-cal. you're an idiot and are mostly silent. It's just a shitty choice to shoot up a Christmas party with because the reload time between shots is ~6s.

A crossbow?... For home defense?... All I can say is, I hope you practice with it in your home on a regular basis so that you are proficient with it and can use it responsibly. 

It's also obvious to me that you don't use projectile weapons on a regular basis. I've seen people miss an E-type target (19.5"x40") at 5 meters with a pistol. A crossbow would be worse, as its trigger weight is generally heavier than a double action pistol.

Finally,  so you shoot with the crossbow, jerk the trigger because you HAVEN'T trained with it, and miss. NOW, you are REALLY @#$%ED, as you just shot at the criminal WITH A GUN... and MISSED. All he has to do is squeeze his trigger, you have to redraw your crossbow, which takes valuable seconds, in which time you die.

The sheer ignorance of this post astounds me.
“Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms”

“The best things in life are beyond money; their price is agony and sweat and devotion ... and the price demanded for the most precious of all things in life is life itself - ultimate cost for perfect value.”
― Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2015, 06:28:06 AM »
A crossbow?... For home defense?... All I can say is, I hope you practice with it in your home on a regular basis so that you are proficient with it and can use it responsibly. 

It's also obvious to me that you don't use projectile weapons on a regular basis. I've seen people miss an E-type target (19.5"x40") at 5 meters with a pistol. A crossbow would be worse, as its trigger weight is generally heavier than a double action pistol.

Finally,  so you shoot with the crossbow, jerk the trigger because you HAVEN'T trained with it, and miss. NOW, you are REALLY @#$%ED, as you just shot at the criminal WITH A GUN... and MISSED. All he has to do is squeeze his trigger, you have to redraw your crossbow, which takes valuable seconds, in which time you die.

The sheer ignorance of this post astounds me.

My guess is this idiot bought it as a souvenir at a RenFair and it now doubles as his "home defense weapon".

But considering this mental midget says he won't even put up a fight if someone invades his home...that he'll just hide in his "safe" room...and probably sucking his thumb and clutching his wooby at the same time...why does he even need a crossbow?
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2015, 06:31:17 AM »
Quote
Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. The police.

File a report. Wait for the insurance check to arrive. It's only stuff.

Oh you mean if I catch him in my house? The police. I have a safe room.   ::)

Oh...you mean if my life is in danger? The police. I'm going to need to file a report after I kill him with my bear hands. (That's a pun, not a typo. I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.) Also, I own a crossbow. Advantage in a small space? Me. 9" bolts with barbed mechanical broadheads do a ****-load more damage than anything smaller than a 50-cal. you're an idiot and are mostly silent. It's just a shitty choice to shoot up a Christmas party with because the reload time between shots is ~6s.

comment 3029:
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=81827.3025
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Big Dog

  • ^^Smokes cigars and knows things.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15581
  • Reputation: +1954/-213
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2015, 06:51:06 AM »
comment 3029:
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=81827.3025

The Carol Channing primitive has never heard of "truth in advertising", has he?
Government is the negation of liberty.
  -Ludwig von Mises

CAVE FVROREM PATIENTIS.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2015, 06:52:25 AM »
The Carol Channing primitive has never heard of "truth in advertising", has he?

Uh huh.

With a name like that, I had no idea he'd look so.....Italianate.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline DumbAss Tanker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 28493
  • Reputation: +1710/-151
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2015, 08:03:18 AM »
Arrows, and bolts from a crossbow that can be cocked without a windlass or crank, won't stop a human in his tracks unless you score one right into the heart, aorta, or inner half of the eye socket.  Anywhere else and even a mortally-wounded attacker will still close and turn you into chum bucket fill long before internal bleeding saps his life force.

The pistol crossbows are strictly toys.  It's *possible* to inflict a mortal wound with one, but ridiculously unlikely.  And using a bow or a crossbow on a rapidly-closing short range target is something that ain't gonna go well unless you actually have practiced it a LOT or you really are an Elf archer.  Pretty good chance the unpracticed will just shake the bolt off the firing tray in simply yanking it into alignment with the target. 
Go and tell the Spartans, O traveler passing by
That here, obedient to their law, we lie.

Anything worth shooting once is worth shooting at least twice.

Offline BlueStateSaint

  • Here I come to save the day, because I'm a
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32553
  • Reputation: +1560/-191
  • RIP FDNY Lt. Rich Nappi d. 4/16/12
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2015, 08:06:38 AM »
DAT, I think that the general gist of Ol' Slow Joe Biden's advice would be much better . . .


"Get a shotgun." :whistling:
"Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of Liberty." - Thomas Jefferson

"All you have to do is look straight and see the road, and when you see it, don't sit looking at it - walk!" -Ayn Rand
 
"Those that trust God with their safety must yet use proper means for their safety, otherwise they tempt Him, and do not trust Him.  God will provide, but so must we also." - Matthew Henry, Commentary on 2 Chronicles 32, from Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible

"These anti-gun fools are more dangerous to liberty than street criminals or foreign spies."--Theodore Haas, Dachau Survivor

Chase her.
Chase her even when she's yours.
That's the only way you'll be assured to never lose her.

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #18 on: December 09, 2015, 08:23:46 AM »
The Channumbers primitive is no doubt aa catcher.
Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline RayRaytheSBS

  • "There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men."
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1195
  • Reputation: +200/-13
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #19 on: December 09, 2015, 09:53:54 AM »
I love how the DUches think criminals go down in one shot and are dead, regardless of where they are hit(vital zone vs. non-vital zone hit) like they see in the movies and TV. News flash DUche, hydraulic decompression (bleeding out) takes 30 seconds to minutes to occur.  In which time, your crimina has put MULTIPLE BULLETS IN YOU, thus ensuring your death and removal from the gene pool. 
“Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor, and the contrary opinion is wishful thinking at its worst. Breeds that forget this basic truth have always paid for it with their lives and their freedoms”

“The best things in life are beyond money; their price is agony and sweat and devotion ... and the price demanded for the most precious of all things in life is life itself - ultimate cost for perfect value.”
― Robert A. Heinlein, Starship Troopers

Offline txradioguy

  • Minister of Propaganda
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18686
  • Reputation: +1292/-1116
  • Rule 39
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #20 on: December 09, 2015, 10:08:16 AM »
I love how the DUches think criminals go down in one shot and are dead, regardless of where they are hit(vital zone vs. non-vital zone hit) like they see in the movies and TV. News flash DUche, hydraulic decompression (bleeding out) takes 30 seconds to minutes to occur.  In which time, your crimina has put MULTIPLE BULLETS IN YOU, thus ensuring your death and removal from the gene pool.

Depending on what drug they are on they might not stop coming at you no matter how many rounds you fire.

I seem to recall something in the AAR's from Operation Mountain Lion where in some of the fire fights 9mm pistols were used on the attackers and they didn't drop until the 15th round from the mag had been discharged.  They were so high on Khat they didn't stop.
The libs/dems of today are the Quislings of former years. The cowards who would vote a fraud into office in exchange for handouts from the devil.

Creator of the largest Fight Club thread ever!

http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=83285.0

Offline hillneck

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1519
  • Reputation: +120/-5
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #21 on: December 09, 2015, 10:21:21 AM »
Quote
Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.

But you have a safe room.  If you're supposedly sooo bad to the bad then why would you need a safe room.     
In battle you have to show no mercy for mercy comes after the war when you still have the freedom to ask for it.

"Montani Semper Liberi"

Pray as if God will take care of all; act as if all is up to you.

Offline 67 Rover

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6484
  • Reputation: +1723/-41
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #22 on: December 09, 2015, 11:06:03 AM »
But you have a safe room.  If you're supposedly sooo bad to the bad then why would you need a safe room.     

It also doubles as his Ken doll collection room.
NRA Benefactor member
G.O.A. Life member
G.O.A.L. Life member
Certified Law Enforcement Sig Armorer

Offline wasp69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7567
  • Reputation: +907/-520
  • Hillbilly Yeti
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #23 on: December 09, 2015, 11:06:23 AM »
Quote
Response to clarice (Reply #6)

Tue Dec 8, 2015, 02:32 PM

Chan790 (18,610 posts)
9. The police.

File a report. Wait for the insurance check to arrive. It's only stuff.

Apparently you didn't have to work for your "stuff", otherwise you wouldn't be so cavalier in your suggestion that the rest of us surrender our "stuff" to anyone that wants it.

Incidentally, DUmbass, the theft of "stuff" is only one part of what a criminal will take when you cower in the corner.

Quote
Oh you mean if I catch him in my house? The police. I have a safe room.

Oh, sit in a corner and suck your thumb while your home is violated?  Typical liberal response...   :whatever:

Any wonder why liberals are to never be trusted in matters of security?  Look no further than this shrinking violet.

Quote
Oh...you mean if my life is in danger? The police. I'm going to need to file a report after I kill him with my bear hands.

You are?  Interesting...  Just a few lines ago, you were talking about hiding in your "safe room", now you're going to convince us you're some kind of super badass that should be registered as a lethal weapon?

 :lmao:

Quote
I'm ****ing huge, jacked and scary. The Incredible Hulk has nothing on pissed-off me.

No, sugar, you're not.  You're bald, fat, and you look like you couldn't beat your own meat.

Quote
Also, I own a crossbow. Advantage in a small space? Me.

Unless you're Joffrey Baratheon, shooting a tied up whore, your toy isn't going to do shit except piss off the crackhead that decided to relieve you of your "stuff".

Quote
9" bolts with barbed mechanical broadheads do a ****-load more damage than anything smaller than a 50-cal.

Actually, DUmbass, a simple look at ballistics will tell you that they don't.

A 230 grain Federal Hydra Shok .45 ACP round (my favorite self defense load) has a weight of 0.52 ounces and a muzzle velocity of 1060 feet per second (fps) which will yield 412 foot pounds of kinetic energy at the muzzle and 377 foot pounds at 25 yards.  Considering a bad guy is going to be less than 20 feet from you at any time you confront them in your home, deferring to the larger number (muzzle) would be best.

Conversely, a bow shooting a 400 grain arrow with a 100 grain broadhead at 250 fps will yield 69.4 foot pounds of kinetic energy.

Now, stupid, I want you to pay close attention to what I'm getting ready to say next:  In a very tense situation where you have to pull a trigger to save your life, over 400 foot pounds of force is not only going to make an extremely ugly wound channel, but the bad guy will get knocked on his ass.  Your crossbow isn't going to give the same performance (assuming you get a shot off and it hits the target).

The rounds I use are man-stoppers in all sense of the word.  Yours sounds cool, but won't deliver when you need it most - very quickly, and at close range.

Quote
It's just a shitty choice to shoot up a Christmas party with because the reload time between shots is ~6s.

Only a DUmbass would even consider shooting up a ****ing Christmas party.   :whatever:
"We make men without chests and expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and then bid the geldings to be fruitful."

C.S. Lewis

A community may possess all the necessary moral qualifications, in so high a degree, as to be capable of self-government under the most adverse circumstances; while, on the other hand, another may be so sunk in ignorance and vice, as to be incapable of forming a conception of liberty, or of living, even when most favored by circumstances, under any other than an absolute and despotic government.

John C Calhoun, "Disquisition on Government", 1840

Offline Big Dog

  • ^^Smokes cigars and knows things.
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15581
  • Reputation: +1954/-213
Re: Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not 'Gun Control'
« Reply #24 on: December 09, 2015, 11:47:16 AM »
News flash DUche, hydraulic decompression (bleeding out) takes 30 seconds to minutes to occur.  In which time, your crimina has put MULTIPLE BULLETS IN YOU, thus ensuring your death and removal from the gene pool.

You said that like its a bad thing.
Government is the negation of liberty.
  -Ludwig von Mises

CAVE FVROREM PATIENTIS.