I'm not going to Quote Gina's post - for visual effect, not a problem with her post - but this is responsive to her post immediately above.
The term "habitual aborter" is bizarre to me. The ordinary meaning of "habitual" entails choices. There is no choice in miscarriages. And the "choice" in an ectopic pregnancy for the woman is between living or dying; the baby will not survive in either case.
Pro-Abortionists' denial that having an abortion has negative effects for many/most women seems to be peculiar to the US, from what I've read. EuroLand government "health" "care" agencies and medical communities apparently assume such effects and count/accept them as part of the money and social cost of abortions.
In the US, where Pro-Life vs. Pro-Abortion is a live issue, Pro-Abortion people fear the consequences of acknowledging what EuroLanders consider obviously true. The sad side of that intellectual dishonesty - trying to represent abortion as simple and safe - is that there are millions of women in the US living with a horrible need, and much of the medical community in the US is doing a "Sergeant Schultz": "I see nussing!" The (relatively) few people who do offer counseling and help, Pro-Life crisis pregnancy centers, are demonized by Pro-Abortion people and many municipal, county, and state governments are trying to regulate crisis pregnancy centers out of "business".