The Conservative Cave

The Bar => The Lounge => Topic started by: formerlurker on January 11, 2011, 07:12:42 PM

Title: Question
Post by: formerlurker on January 11, 2011, 07:12:42 PM
What is up with all the new members?    Did someone leave a portal open?

Title: Re: Question
Post by: littlelamb on January 11, 2011, 07:15:57 PM
Blame Bally she did it but that is ok they all seem cool not chew toy worthy LOL
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Carl on January 11, 2011, 07:17:57 PM
A friend of mine signed up tonight as well although hasn`t posted yet.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: IassaFTots on January 11, 2011, 07:18:57 PM
Bally did it. (I feel so tattle-tale-y) They have migrated from Hannity's forum.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: DixieBelle on January 11, 2011, 07:29:05 PM
and welcome to all!!! I think it's great!
Title: Re: Question
Post by: formerlurker on January 11, 2011, 07:31:38 PM
It is great -- just making sure they are legit!!!! 
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Eupher on January 11, 2011, 08:17:23 PM
I read on one of their intro threads that apparently there's some bad blood due to some hard leftists on Hannity's forum who are just a little too cozy with some of the mods, thereby lending the impression of little to no neutrality.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: ColonialMarine0431 on January 11, 2011, 08:19:25 PM
I read on one of their intro threads that apparently there's some bad blood due to some hard leftists on Hannity's forum who are just a little too cozy with some of the mods, thereby lending the impression of little to no neutrality.

They booted me from there a long time ago. No loss. The leftists were taking over annyway.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Eupher on January 11, 2011, 08:21:47 PM
They booted me from there a long time ago. No loss. The leftists were taking over annyway.

Seems a little bizarre. Why would hardcore leftists want to hang around on a forum that's "owned" by a conservative?
Title: Re: Question
Post by: IassaFTots on January 11, 2011, 08:22:26 PM
Seems a little bizarre. Why would hardcore leftists want to hang around on a forum that's "owned" by a conservative?

Sounds like PC bs to me.  

eta:  Not CM's PC bs, other people's.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Chris_ on January 11, 2011, 08:32:05 PM
It is great -- just making sure they are legit!!!! 
(http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/5344/emotcopxa2.gif)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: dutch508 on January 11, 2011, 08:48:10 PM
Someone has to screen these fruitloops and ask them the correct questions. I am too busy right now to do much more than bitchslap the dumb ones and check out the boobiez of the day.


1) Do you like peach cobbler?

2) Where are the naked b00biez pictures at?

I had to complete six DOD classes today. It took me three attempts to pass the new Sex Harrassment one. Yeah...there was a ghey question in there.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: NHSparky on January 11, 2011, 08:51:37 PM
Someone has to screen these fruitloops and ask them the correct questions. I am too busy right now to do much more than bitchslap the dumb ones and check out the boobiez of the day.


1) Do you like peach cobbler?

2) Where are the naked b00biez pictures at?

I had to complete six DOD classes today. It took me three attempts to pass the new Sex Harrassment one. Yeah...there was a ghey question in there.

Seriously, dutch--how many times I gotta tell you that the legs of the barstool point TOWARDS the floor?  Yeah, yeah, I know--you get four times more Army guys in a room when you turn them upside down.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Evil_Conservative on January 11, 2011, 09:05:02 PM
All the new member registrations is clearly the fault of Sarah Palin.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: NHSparky on January 11, 2011, 09:07:30 PM
All the new member registrations is clearly the fault of Sarah Palin.

I'm totally cool with that.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: DixieBelle on January 11, 2011, 09:36:04 PM
Someone has to screen these fruitloops and ask them the correct questions. I am too busy right now to do much more than bitchslap the dumb ones and check out the boobiez of the day.


1) Do you like peach cobbler?

2) Where are the naked b00biez pictures at?

I had to complete six DOD classes today. It took me three attempts to pass the new Sex Harrassment one. Yeah...there was a ghey question in there.
:rofl:

I'm getting out my steppy stool to reach up and bitchslap you.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: IassaFTots on January 11, 2011, 09:37:22 PM
:rofl:

I'm getting out my steppy stool to reach up and bitchslap you.

Steppy stool!!!!!!!!!!! :rotf:

Hi 5!
Title: Re: Question
Post by: DixieBelle on January 11, 2011, 09:38:05 PM
LOLZ. See, I had to beat them to the punch cuz SOMEONE will point out how short I am. :-)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: IassaFTots on January 11, 2011, 09:41:11 PM
LOLZ. See, I had to beat them to the punch cuz SOMEONE will point out how short I am. :-)

I have steppy stools of varying heights, depending on necessity in every room in the house.  Even the bathroom, because I don't have a floor length mirror.   :-)

One of which was a housewarming present and has been bedazzled. 
Title: Re: Question
Post by: DixieBelle on January 11, 2011, 09:42:03 PM
See. :-)

Title: Re: Question
Post by: Alpha Mare on January 11, 2011, 09:58:58 PM
I have steppy stools of varying heights, depending on necessity in every room in the house.  Even the bathroom, because I don't have a floor length mirror.   :-)

One of which was a housewarming present and has been bedazzled. 

Ooh, what a great gift idea for my future daughter-in-law.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: dutch508 on January 11, 2011, 10:12:08 PM
All the new member registrations is clearly the fault of Sarah Palin.


butt slapped.


 O-)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: PhysicsHunter on January 12, 2011, 12:06:35 AM
I read on one of their intro threads that apparently there's some bad blood due to some hard leftists on Hannity's forum who are just a little too cozy with some of the mods, thereby lending the impression of little to no neutrality.

I am one of the newbies from Hannity. 

That is a nice light-handed description of the issue. 

Some of these people who are looking around for other venues are my good friends and I do not want to lose them.  I am not leaving Hannity but I am branching out.

I went onto Hannity after Obama was actually being sworn in to fight the libs.  I had to do something.  Unlike some that are coming over, they can speak for themselves, I am not tired.  I am tired of having to retreat into ever more esoteric forms of logically flaying the libs. 
Title: Re: Question
Post by: PhysicsHunter on January 12, 2011, 01:08:56 AM
As you would expect from any group we vary greatly in personality, humor and style.  To be honest the person among the the Hannity folk I have seen here that I know least is Bally.

I will quit talking about others.  Suffice it to say it is difficult to have years of trust and almost 15K posts reduced to having to start a thread called "Null" when they would let me say nothing else about liberal excesses in crazy comments about every leading Conservative after the recent evil act.  They told me to say Nothing, so I did, over and over.

I am a scientist, researcher, hunter, archer, father of pre-schoolers with the best wife in the universe, and Born Again only by the Grace of God fully convinced of TULIP.

Heck, I was even a GOP Presidents Club member until we no longer had a President, Senate, or House.

And Mark Levin IS the MAN!
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Trip on January 12, 2011, 01:47:52 AM
Blame Bally she did it but that is ok they all seem cool not chew toy worthy LOL

Generally all of us are combat hardened Hannity vets, each with our own talents and approaches.  I myself have over 23k posts there.

I'm somewhat known for methodical, and often lengthy arguments ("walls") , with lots of supporting reference.  These "walls" led my opponents to pursue a "personal" (ad hom) approach with me. Unfortunately, I make a particularly lousy chew toy and come with spikes and razor-wire of my own.  I can play on their field, but would rather not, as that approach is not my own inclination.   Perhaps as a result of this, the mods have seen fit to give the "Libs" a high degree of latitude regarding TOS with me, sometimes to my displeasure.

What began our migration off of Hannity was, in  some ways, the result of my two-week timeout for addressing another "Guest" there as "Einstein".   The warrant for my "Einstein" address was his accusation that I was offering only my own "opinion", even while quoting my post which referenced the U.S. Supreme Court.  During that timeout, with the help of another "co-conspirator", we began pulling the Best O'the Best from Hannity to an IRC chatroom, so as to better marshal our forces, and discuss the degrading condition of the "field of combat".

What you find among us here are that Best O'the Best.

That "field of combat" worsened more in recent days as a  result of the AZ shooting. You're all aware of the media accusations of "the Right" (inclusive of Palin's tareted political map) having influenced the shooting. Hannity's forum had the policy instituted of "no politicization" of events, which would have been fine, except that some members of the left were given latitude to reference these media claims as if fact, while we were generally silenced. Particular members of the left there have 'untouchable' status because of having met the Mods at get-togethers.



Title: Re: Question
Post by: PhysicsHunter on January 12, 2011, 01:57:11 AM
Generally all of us are combat hardened Hannity vets, each with our own talents and approaches.  I myself have over 23k posts there.

I'm somewhat known for methodical, and often lengthy arguments ("walls") , with lots of supporting reference.  These "walls" led my opponents to pursue a "personal" (ad hom) approach with me. Unfortunately, I make a particularly lousy chew toy and come with spikes and razor-wire of my own.  I can play on their field, but would rather not, as that approach is not my own inclination.   Perhaps as a result of this, the mods have seen fit to give the "Libs" a high degree of latitude regarding TOS with me, sometimes to my displeasure.

What began our migration off of Hannity was, in  some ways, the result of my two-week timeout for addressing another "Guest" there as "Einstein".   The warrant for my "Einstein" address was his accusation that I was offering only my own "opinion", even while quoting my post which referenced the U.S. Supreme Court.  During that timeout, with the help of another "co-conspirator", we began pulling the Best O'the Best from Hannity to an IRC chatroom, so as to better marshal our forces, and discuss the degrading condition of the "field of combat".

What you find among us here are that Best O'the Best.

That "field of combat" worsened more in recent days as a  result of the AZ shooting. You're all aware of the media accusations of "the Right" (inclusive of Palin's tareted political map) having influenced the shooting. Hannity's forum had the policy instituted of "no politicization" of events, which would have been fine, except that some members of the left were given latitude to reference these media claims as if fact, while we were generally silenced. Particular members of the left there have 'untouchable' status because of having met the Mods at get-togethers.

Ah, Nil.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Mishiny on January 12, 2011, 08:02:09 AM
Someone has to screen these fruitloops and ask them the correct questions. I am too busy right now to do much more than bitchslap the dumb ones and check out the boobiez of the day.


1) Do you like peach cobbler?

2) Where are the naked b00biez pictures at?

I had to complete six DOD classes today. It took me three attempts to pass the new Sex Harrassment one. Yeah...there was a ghey question in there.
The dumb ones??  Hey I got one of those bitch slaps!   :tongue:
Trips description of the Hannity forum demise is point on. 
I love this place so far!  Thanks for all the welcomes   :)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Eupher on January 12, 2011, 09:33:02 AM
The dumb ones??  Hey I got one of those bitch slaps!   :tongue:
Trips description of the Hannity forum demise is point on. 
I love this place so far!  Thanks for all the welcomes   :)

No worries about the bitchslaps. Bitching about bitchslaps usually results in someone, usually Thor, who hands them out like candy.

As you can see, I've been the recipient of many such bitchslaps and I'm still standing.   :bitchslap:

Sorta.

 :-)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Ballygrl on January 12, 2011, 09:51:03 AM
Blame Bally she did it but that is ok they all seem cool not chew toy worthy LOL

:lmao:

All I did was say in chat how much I liked posting here LOL.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Ballygrl on January 12, 2011, 09:53:34 AM
It is great -- just making sure they are legit!!!!

OMG yes, totally legit. I should've probably sent a note to 1 of the mods when I saw everyone signing up here, but I was so excited to see them that I didn't think of that until after.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Ballygrl on January 12, 2011, 09:58:15 AM
As you would expect from any group we vary greatly in personality, humor and style.  To be honest the person among the the Hannity folk I have seen here that I know least is Bally.

I know, that's so weird, I'm mostly in Washington Politics and venture into General Discussion which seems to be the only times I remember seeing you. I think we probably have different interests in WP so we hardly run into each other there.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Evil_Conservative on January 12, 2011, 02:41:42 PM
The dumb ones??  Hey I got one of those bitch slaps!   :tongue:
Trips description of the Hannity forum demise is point on. 
I love this place so far!  Thanks for all the welcomes   :)

Dutch hands out BS for no reason at all.

One time, he BS me for talking about turkey or some sort of food when he was hungry.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: The Hollywood NeoCon on January 12, 2011, 03:03:02 PM

That "field of combat" worsened more in recent days as a  result of the AZ shooting. You're all aware of the media accusations of "the Right" (inclusive of Palin's tareted political map) having influenced the shooting. Hannity's forum had the policy instituted of "no politicization" of events, which would have been fine, except that some members of the left were given latitude to reference these media claims as if fact, while we were generally silenced. Particular members of the left there have 'untouchable' status because of having met the Mods at get-togethers.

Which is precisely the reason I've stopped paticipating at any forum where libtards are even tolerated, let alone encouraged to fling poo on the walls. I've become sick and ****ing tired of following rules when said rules are only applied to me. I've had it up to my ass with squishy, gutless alleged conservatives who insist that tolerating the offal of the Loughner Left only demonstrates how much better we are, and I swear to Cecil B. DeMille and Jack L. Warner that I'm going to put a shovel in the face of the next shameless twat who hasn't yet realized that that sort of self-destructive sanctimony can only result in defeat at best, and being made the subject of scorn, at the very least.

And I don't know about you, but I haven't turned the other cheek to being made fun of since I was 8 ****ing years old, and realized I had a pretty badass left cross. Southpaws rock.

If the last four days have taught me anything, it's reminded me that these people, when allowed to gather in numbers greater than one, become little more than viruses with shoes and keyboards, and that celebrity-driven conservative forums are more often than not nothing more than gladiator schools for leftist trolls.

Aside from all of that, welcome all.  :cheersmate:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Eupher on January 12, 2011, 03:17:52 PM
Which is precisely the reason I've stopped paticipating at any forum where libtards are even tolerated, let alone encouraged to fling poo on the walls. I've become sick and ****ing tired of following rules when said rules are only applied to me. I've had it up to my ass with squishy, gutless alleged conservatives who insist that tolerating the offal of the Loughner Left only demonstrates how much better we are, and I swear to Cecil B. DeMille and Jack L. Warner that I'm going to put a shovel in the face of the next shameless twat who hasn't yet realized that that sort of self-destructive sanctimony can only result in defeat at best, and being made the subject of scorn, at the very least.

And I don't know about you, but I haven't turned the other cheek to being made fun of since I was 8 ****ing years old, and realized I had a pretty badass left cross. Southpaws rock.

If the last four days have taught me anything, it's reminded me that these people, when allowed to gather in numbers greater than one, become little more than viruses with shoes and keyboards, and that celebrity-driven conservative forums are more often than not nothing more than gladiator schools for leftist trolls.

Aside from all of that, welcome all.  :cheersmate:

I don't profess to speak for management, but I'd say with a certain amount of certainty that libs are tolerated here. Differing viewpoints are encouraged and spirited debate happens frequently, as you know. TRG's recent decapitation of Laelth (oh, SHIT!!!! I've used a ****ing VIOLENT WORD!!!!!!eleventy!!!! -- does that mean that I'm a Loughner wannabe?????) in the Fight Club is witness to a very strong exchange. Laelth even complimented the site for being even-handed enough to allow him/her/it to engage at will.

And so it is. Compaqxp is another example of a lib who appears to have withstood the ritualistic black and blue (oh, Keerist, there it is AGAIN!!!!) that goes with being an idiot and being called on it. There are a few more, as well, but they escape me at the moment - Miss Mia, though she hasn't been around in quite a while.

Anyway, I'd say that libs are tolerated here - their procreation may not be encouraged or even tolerated, but they themselves aren't gutted (damn.....) after posting.



 :whistling:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: The Hollywood NeoCon on January 12, 2011, 03:22:48 PM

Anyway, I'd say that libs are tolerated here - their procreation may not be encouraged or even tolerated, but they themselves aren't gutted (damn.....) after posting.

 :whistling:

I really don't consider either Laelth or compaxqxradsw (whatever the hell his name is) libtards...

They have vastly different points of view, but they're not the frothing, seething, contemptuous, mistaking-irony-for-humor, smug ****sticks we see over on the Island.

If either of them had had the stones to post here what that colossal sociopath Kos tweeted the day of the shooting, I'm pretty certain they would've been banned, and one of you kind admins would've forwarded me their ISP, after which I would've had them living in a cardboard box by day's end.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Eupher on January 12, 2011, 03:36:37 PM
I really don't consider either Laelth or compaxqxradsw (whatever the hell his name is) libtards...

They have vastly different points of view, but they're not the frothing, seething, contemptuous, mistaking-irony-for-humor, smug ****sticks we see over on the Island.

If either of them had had the stones to post here what that colossal sociopath Kos tweeted the day of the shooting, I'm pretty certain they would've been banned, and one of you kind admins would've forwarded me their ISP, after which I would've had them living in a cardboard box by day's end.

Well, I guess I'm sorta shielded because I just don't go to the DUmp, or to Skin's Island. Once in awhile I'll hold my nose and peruse the Daily Kos or even stroll down Huffpo Ave., but life's too short to mingle with ****tards - at least deliberately.

Point taken, though.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: cavegal on January 12, 2011, 03:44:09 PM
I really don't consider either Laelth or compaxqxradsw (whatever the hell his name is) libtards...

They have vastly different points of view, but they're not the frothing, seething, contemptuous, mistaking-irony-for-humor, smug ****sticks we see over on the Island.

If either of them had had the stones to post here what that colossal sociopath Kos tweeted the day of the shooting, I'm pretty certain they would've been banned, and one of you kind admins would've forwarded me their ISP, after which I would've had them living in a cardboard box by day's end.
:popcorn:  haha just had to use the popcorn graphic!
Title: Re: Question
Post by: PhysicsHunter on January 12, 2011, 10:57:58 PM
I know, that's so weird, I'm mostly in Washington Politics and venture into General Discussion which seems to be the only times I remember seeing you. I think we probably have different interests in WP so we hardly run into each other there.

Yeah I was all Wash Politics over on Hannity. Probably have fewer than 100 posts outside WP, some back channell requests to come over to the Religious Forum or some other General area to explain some point of Quantum Physics or Predestination...

I have read your posts often but since my time in the WP was mostly running about A-Viking on the poor hapless Libbies, (I think that is "Chew Toys" hereabouts) or degaussing with conservative warriors that became friends.  Somehow we did not converse much.


Either way I am pleased that your post apparently let me and other s find this place.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Ballygrl on January 13, 2011, 08:11:48 AM
Yeah I was all Wash Politics over on Hannity. Probably have fewer than 100 posts outside WP, some back channell requests to come over to the Religious Forum or some other General area to explain some point of Quantum Physics or Predestination...

I have read your posts often but since my time in the WP was mostly running about A-Viking on the poor hapless Libbies, (I think that is "Chew Toys" hereabouts) or degaussing with conservative warriors that became friends.  Somehow we did not converse much.

Either way I am pleased that your post apparently let me and other s find this place.

Glad to have you guys here. I really like it and hope you guys do too.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Laelth on October 04, 2013, 12:16:27 PM
I really don't consider either Laelth or compaxqxradsw (whatever the hell his name is) libtards...

They have vastly different points of view, but they're not the frothing, seething, contemptuous, mistaking-irony-for-humor, smug ****sticks we see over on the Island.

If either of them had had the stones to post here what that colossal sociopath Kos tweeted the day of the shooting, I'm pretty certain they would've been banned, and one of you kind admins would've forwarded me their ISP, after which I would've had them living in a cardboard box by day's end.
Wow.  Thank you.

 :cheersmate:

-Laelth
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Thor on October 04, 2013, 03:28:49 PM
Wow.  Thank you.

 :cheersmate:

-Laelth

Is there some valid reason to resurrect a thread that's in excess of two years old besides being an attention whore?
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Laelth on October 04, 2013, 03:46:24 PM
Is there some valid reason to resurrect a thread that's in excess of two years old besides being an attention whore?
You make a good point.  I was just pleased to see that someone complimented me.  Do you want me to delete my post?  What's the right thing to do here?

(http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r251/xyzero123/shrug_n.gif)

-Laelth
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Thor on October 04, 2013, 04:09:44 PM
No need in deleting your post. I just thought it was pretty inane to resurrect something that's close to three years old. It's so pathetic it makes me  :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Laelth on October 04, 2013, 04:42:12 PM
No need in deleting your post. I just thought it was pretty inane to resurrect something that's close to three years old. It's so pathetic it makes me  :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf: :rotf:
"Pathetic."  OK, man.  Let us hope that The Hollywood NeoCon disagrees with you.  I want that poster to know that I appreciated his kind words.

And I did.

-Laelth
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Thor on October 04, 2013, 04:51:15 PM
Hollywood Neocon hasn't been active on the forum in over a year and a half.  ;) In other words, your words of appreciation falls on blind eyes......   :hammer: :hammer: :hammer: :hammer:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: seahorse513 on October 04, 2013, 07:34:45 PM
"Pathetic."  OK, man.  Let us hope that The Hollywood NeoCon disagrees with you.  I want that poster to know that I appreciated his kind words.

And I did.

-Laelth

Ok buddy, how did you get 247 bs, and you only have 278 posts? :mental:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: IassaFTots on October 04, 2013, 07:53:51 PM
Awwww....I miss HNC and Compaq.   :bawl:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: dutch508 on October 04, 2013, 07:57:51 PM
Ok buddy, how did you get 247 bs, and you only have 278 posts? :mental:

 :tongue:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: seahorse513 on October 04, 2013, 08:03:46 PM
:tongue:

You are such a naughty boy! :wink:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Thor on October 04, 2013, 10:39:36 PM
Ok buddy, how did you get 247 bs, and you only have 278 posts? :mental:

Fixed!!  :)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: RobJohnson on October 05, 2013, 02:32:49 AM
You make a good point.  I was just pleased to see that someone complimented me.  Do you want me to delete my post?  What's the right thing to do here?

(http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r251/xyzero123/shrug_n.gif)

-Laelth

I gave you a ^5 for waking Thor up.  :-)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Laelth on October 05, 2013, 08:34:33 AM
Hollywood Neocon hasn't been active on the forum in over a year and a half.  ;) In other words, your words of appreciation falls on blind eyes......   :hammer: :hammer: :hammer: :hammer:

My bad.  Sorry.  I should have sent a PM.

-Laelth
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Laelth on October 05, 2013, 08:36:54 AM

I gave you a ^5 for waking Thor up.  :-)
Thanks, I think.   :cheersmate:

-Laelth
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Thor on October 05, 2013, 01:30:42 PM
Thor has been "awake", just quiet....  ;)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: RobJohnson on October 05, 2013, 08:56:53 PM
Thor has been "awake", just quiet....  ;)


 :rofl:
Title: Re: Question
Post by: DefiantSix on October 06, 2013, 10:22:48 AM
Thor has been "awake", just quiet....  ;)

(http://sciencefiction.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/hobbit-trailer-smaug-featured.jpg)
Title: Re: Question
Post by: Eupher on October 06, 2013, 11:17:00 AM
(http://sciencefiction.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/hobbit-trailer-smaug-featured.jpg)

Something tells me Smaug didn't brush his teeth that morning.
Title: Re: Question
Post by: njpines on October 07, 2013, 08:20:07 AM
Awwww....I miss HNC and Compaq.   :bawl:

Well, Dexter is over, maybe he'll come back . . .