A general comment about thug Brown and priors

[BannedFromDU]

There are far too many DUmp threads and posts to bring over, but I can scarcely enjoy a good DUmp session anymore without seeing the following at every turn:

So what if Mike Brown robbed a store and roughed up the owner? That does not justify the death penalty.

While we can debate even that statement (spoiler alert: the clerk, being choked, would have been within legal rights to deflate Brown of his blood at that point), I need to
clarify something for the lurking DUmmies here. Because you assholes lurk, I know that you are either (a) curious, and/or (b) dissatisfied with the DUmp. This is for you:

The point is not that the robbery and assault deserved the 'death penalty,' The point is merely that because he proved, amply, that he was a violent brute who
believed he was entitled to steal and then assault a person who had the temerity to protest his theft, that he probably also felt entitled to Wilson's firearm.

At which point, Wilson compromised somewhat and allowed Brown to have several things that were inside his firearm, and therefore here we all are.

In case you missed the point: the robbery and assault merely proved Brown's propensity to be a thug, and along with the physical evidence, Wilson was deemed credible and
Brown was deemed dead.

I don't see why you DUmmies have such trouble understanding this. After all, you're STILL talking about Bush's DUI YEARS after he left office, arguing that it proved that he
was not fit to lead.

Likewise any number of things from Bush's past, including things that were conjured from thin air and which caused the delightful downfall of blowhard pseudo-Texan
Dan Rather.

Similarly, you howled that Romney's college pranks revealed a DEEP psychosis that not only disqualified him from the Presidency, but required jail time.

So, to summarize: a prank from 40 years ago is a perfect predictor of dangerous, antisocial behavior if it's a Republican, but a violent assault CAPTURED ON FILM JUST MINUTES BEFORE
has no bearing or relevance whatsoever if it's a hoodrat.

That, in a nutshell, is why you are DUmmies. 

[Bad Dog]

H-5, Right on the money.  Wasted on the DUmmies however.

[BlueStateSaint]

K&R!

[marv]

I don't see why you DUmmies have such trouble understanding this. After all, you're STILL talking about Bush's DUI YEARS after he left office, arguing that it proved that he was not fit to lead.

Likewise any number of things from Bush's past, including things that were conjured from thin air and which caused the delightful downfall of blowhard pseudo-Texan Dan Rather.

Similarly, you howled that Romney's college pranks revealed a DEEP psychosis that not only disqualified him from the Presidency, but required jail time.

So, to summarize: a prank from 40 years ago is a perfect predictor of dangerous, antisocial behavior if it's a Republican, but a violent assault CAPTURED ON FILM JUST MINUTES BEFORE has no bearing or relevance whatsoever if it's a hoodrat.

That, in a nutshell, is why you are DUmmies.

While we travel back in time to prove disqualifications for president, how about Hillary?

What? No takers? How convenient!

BTW, what Fauxcahontas leaked this one to the National Enquirer? Liberals are known to eat their own.

[obumazombie]

With libs there's no limit to the inequality of their double standards.

[HawkHogan]

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/oreilly-there-is-no-plague-of-white-cops-acting-violently-against-blacks/

Let's add Bill O Reilly's segment tonight to help educate the Dummies.

[fatboy]

It is my personal opinion that many gun grabbers, and this includes most on The Isle of Skins, want to take my guns away from me because they cannot pass an NICS check themselves. This due to a past felony drug conviction or domestic abuse situation. And because  they think that mayhem helps their cause, they are agreeable to it. Also, they hate the cops because they are the ones mixed up in the complaint that started of the process that resulted in their not being able to pass the NICS background check.

For people that claim to be soo smart, they really are retarded.

[Dori]

So what if Mike Brown robbed a store and roughed up the owner? That does not justify the death penalty.

While we can debate even that statement (spoiler alert: the clerk, being choked, would have been within legal rights to deflate Brown of his blood at that point),

This is what I've thought about too.  If the store clerk had killed Brown, we would have never heard about it.  But the DUmmies love their faux "rage", and pounce on these stories like vultures on road kill.

[fatboy]

dupe, sorry