Did you note this to her? It might be insightful to know her response.
No because her and I already went rounds over a hissy fit she had about parents of autistic children explaining to people when a child is disruptive that they are autisic as being apologetic for something they shouldn't be instead of it being an educational moment when people may be wondering what is wrong
Trust me there isn't no getting through. I have, however, had this disagreeent with a friend of mine in person and she backtracked saying well of course character mattered more to which I asked her then why she would even support the idea of supporting women based on gender only since if she does that she will always choose a female before she can even know their character. I told her perhaps she meant she would encourage and support her female friends in their efforts, but that is not the way it is qualified when this discussion happens. The discussion comes across as rah rah--go girl go--no boys allowed. She said she hadn't thought about it that way...
ps I noted to myself mentally that considering her view on the above she was likely the type who thought any disruption to other folks by her kids didn't desrve notice, acknowledgement, or apology and therefore we would never see eye to eye on that sicne quite frankly I despise other women and mothers like that and they usually are the ones who want this sisterhood of women since lets face it when they stand on their own parenting merits and other qualities it becomes apparent that sisterhood is very necessary to the to avoid responsibility for their intrusive choices and lack of intervention.
