Observation of primitives/liberals after the election

[USA4ME]

Since the election, the DNC and other "go to" info centers for the Dems have not really put out any real talking points as to why things happened the way they did. I have noticed that the primitives, and liberals in general, without their leaders telling them what to say and how to react, are all over the map when discussing why.

A further confirmation they are nothing but sheep.

.

[SSG Snuggle Bunny]

They never come to a consensus on anything about themselves. They can only act in concert when condemning The Others.

Constantly shifting their arguments is one of many tactics to avoid accountability, which is how they preserve their air of superiority.

[I_B_Perky]

Since the election, the DNC and other "go to" info centers for the Dems have not really put out any real talking points as to why things happened the way they did. I have noticed that the primitives, and liberals in general, without their leaders telling them what to say and how to react, are all over the map when discussing why.

A further confirmation they are nothing but sheep.

.

The MSM and the other libs are all in shock, USA. Most of the MSM is saying it was because dems did not tout obumbles and his accomplishments. In other words,  they are using play number one from the liberal playbook... they did not get their message out.  Takes time to filter down to the dummies.   

[Mr Mannn]

The MSM and the other libs are all in shock,

Yes, they are in shock. But they shouldn't be. They saw this all coming months in advance with plenty of time to alter course.

This is just like 2010 only on a larger scale. Both times the dems did nothing to avoid their fate.
Interestingly, both times Obama did nothing either.

Ya gotta wonder,
1) can a national party really be that stupid?
2) is this some kind of sacrifice play?
3) Did Obama MIHOP (*) to empower his dictatorial dreams?
4) Did Hillary sh!t her pantsuit?
5) or all of the above?

[USA4ME]

They never come to a consensus on anything about themselves. They can only act in concert when condemning The Others.

Constantly shifting their arguments is one of many tactics to avoid accountability, which is how they preserve their air of superiority.

I read what you wrote here yesterday, and I can't argue against what you said; there most definitely is that element where they avoid at all costs accepting blame.

In lieu of that, I continued to read what they had to say yesterday on and off as I was able, and they are still a ship without a rudder. It's the same this morning. And still there seems to be this underlying current among them they wish desperately that one of their leaders would step up to the plate and give them their talking points. Dear Leader just stood up there at his press conference rambling and all they had to say about him was what wonderful stage presence he has, so that gave them nothing from which to unite. They are truly waiting for someone to tell them "Here's what you say happened and here's what you say when confronted by the opposition."

.

[Ralph Wiggum]

[youtube][http://youtu.be/4a6YdNmK77k[/youtube]

[USA4ME]

Reading their posts today.

They're still sheep without a shepard

.

[I_B_Perky]

Yes, they are in shock. But they shouldn't be. They saw this all coming months in advance with plenty of time to alter course.

This is just like 2010 only on a larger scale. Both times the dems did nothing to avoid their fate.
Interestingly, both times Obama did nothing either.

Ya gotta wonder,
1) can a national party really be that stupid?
2) is this some kind of sacrifice play?
3) Did Obama MIHOP (*) to empower his dictatorial dreams?
4) Did Hillary sh!t her pantsuit?
5) or all of the above?

I pick #1 Mr. Mann. The MSM covers for them so much, with the polls, editorials, etc, the dems just cannot seem to understand the common man's issues. They really are clueless. When it bites them in the ass, the dems and their buddies in the MSM stomp their feet and declare people are voting against their best interests because they are brainwashed.

Which leads me to this: what self respecting person, trying hard to make it, is going to vote against their best interest? We are not talking about dummies here, ordinary people. Reality has a way of cutting thru the smoke the MSM blows up the masses asses, and tends to make people pissed off when they damn well know different.

The losers on welfare don't see the hardship because the state of the economy just simply does not affect them. They get their check no matter what. The working man... well that is a horse of an entirely different hue. That is the dem problem in a nutshell. They quit representing the working man. They are now the party of the rich and welfare poor. Oh the dems pay lip service to the working man, they always do, and it is just not working for one simple reason. It is a lie.

[USA4ME]

I am enjoying being an active participant in their current discussions about the direction of their party and helping stir the pot. At the moment, the "progressive" kooks are at odds with the "third-way" kooks over who should stay and who should go. The progressives, while being the predominant nutsos on the island, are not the ones who have the power and the money within the party power structure. Yet they are so sure that all they need to do is to purge the third-way Dems and just get the money out of politics in order to clear the way for their progressive populist utopia, then everyone will hail them as the geniuses they have already proclaimed themselves to be.

There are no individuals more destined to be disappointed in life than progressive populists, anarchists, and liberals.

.

[Fourwinds]

You can go to DU or any other liberal dominated forum and notice one common thing in their posts. They cannot admit their party screwed up. It isn't beyond them if you can read between the lines. But to bring themselves to say it seems to be impossible.

But that's the whole point isn't it? This whole "I know what's better for everyone" attitude liberals and their politicians have been displaying for years caused this backlash among voters and the present predicament leftists are about to find themselves in.

[marv]

The losers on welfare don't see the hardship because the state of the economy just simply does not affect them. They get their check no matter what. The working man... well that is a horse of an entirely different hue. That is the dem problem in a nutshell. They quit representing the working man. They are now the party of the rich and welfare poor. Oh the dems pay lip service to the working man, they always do, and it is just not working for one simple reason. It is a lie.

Beautiful observation. Dems get money from the rich, and votes from the poor. When the working man is no more, anybody that's left will be happy.

[Dori]

This is just like 2010 only on a larger scale. Both times the dems did nothing to avoid their fate.

I was wondering if this year is any worse than 2010, wasn't following them in that midterm. 

They certainly seem out of sorts and blaming everyone for their losses. 

Lots of infighting too.   

[BlueStateSaint]

Yes, they are in shock. But they shouldn't be. They saw this all coming months in advance with plenty of time to alter course.

This is just like 2010 only on a larger scale. Both times the dems did nothing to avoid their fate.
Interestingly, both times Obama did nothing either.

Ya gotta wonder,
1) can a national party really be that stupid?
2) is this some kind of sacrifice play?
3) Did Obama MIHOP (*) to empower his dictatorial dreams?
4) Did Hillary sh!t her pantsuit?
5) or all of the above?

To answer your questions . . .

Yes.

[miskie]

I was wondering if this year is any worse than 2010, wasn't following them in that midterm. 

They certainly seem out of sorts and blaming everyone for their losses. 

Lots of infighting too.   

I think part of the problem is unlike 2010, the pollsters did their best to build up the Democrats hopes by declaring races 'close' that weren't even in the same universe, with the hopes of energizing Dems and sending them to the polls, while depressing opposition turnout. It backfired. BIG TIME. 

Wendy Davis *NEVER* stood a snowball's chance - Neither did Grimes - Yet many had those races and others like them as 'too close to call'. Also, the margins of defeat in many of these races were wider than the Grand Canyon, so wide that the old 'stolen election' canard doesn't even play well with many. 

Davis lost Texas by nearly 21 points. - So much so that her campaign is blaming the beating on Cracka-ass honky women & Ebola.

McConnell beat Grimes by 16 points. - Reality says that a beating like this can only happen when the race was never close, barring an epic October Surprise. Yet the Dems thought it was within the realm of winnable.

With results like this coming in, MSNBC and others than turned to governor's races, hoping for big wins there. Nope.

etc etc etc..

So now the Dems are super deflated & angry. The media campaign backfired, leaving many of them devastated by insurmountable defeats they didn't see coming. Too bad, primitives.   

[freedumb2003b]

The MSM and the other libs are all in shock, USA. Most of the MSM is saying it was because dems did not tout obumbles and his accomplishments. In other words,  they are using play number one from the liberal playbook... they did not get their message out.  Takes time to filter down to the dummies.   :lmao:

The dems didn't have to do anything to get their message across.  Republicans were more than happy to quote that message verbatim, which led to the landslide.  If dems had been better about delivering their message, there would be even MORE red on the electoral map.

Same for mary burke in WI (I was working there although I live in TX -- it was like the same election in 2 places with wendy/mary hewing to 100% lies as a campaign tactic).  When I flew out for the last time at the end of October, pollsters had it a dead heat, which perplexed many on Talk Radio (with good reason it turns out).  The result was a landslide/tsunami whatever you want to call it.

[Dori]

I think part of the problem is unlike 2010, the pollsters did their best to build up the Democrats hopes by declaring races 'close' that weren't even in the same universe, with the hopes of energizing Dems and sending them to the polls, while depressing opposition turnout. It backfired. BIG TIME. 

That sounds right, and the media is only too happy to help them.

Anyone aware of any pollsters that had it right?

[franksolich]

I was wondering if this year is any worse than 2010, wasn't following them in that midterm. 

They certainly seem out of sorts and blaming everyone for their losses. 

Lots of infighting too.   

It's hard to tell.  I very well recall the primitive reaction in 2010, when the now-late bird-smacking stoned red-faced primitive, the "Redstone" primitive, got his face rearranged in nasty fisticuffs in a Massachusetts bar that evening. 

He just couldn't keep his mouth shut.

The primitive reaction this year, I'm still assessing.  It's scrambled eggs right now.

[BattleHymn]

It's hard to tell.  I very well recall the primitive reaction in 2010, when the now-late bird-smacking stoned red-faced primitive, the "Redstone" primitive, got his face rearranged in nasty fisticuffs in a Massachusetts bar that evening. 

He just couldn't keep his mouth shut.

The primitive reaction this year, I'm still assessing.  It's scrambled eggs right now.

I don't recall the 2010 disarray being as bad as this go around, do you?

I wasn't here for elections prior.