Wisconsin ID Ruling Withstands Appellate Rehearing Bid

[Delmar]

Sat Sep 27, 2014, 10:52 AM
madamvlb (34 posts)
Wisconsin ID Ruling Withstands Appellate Rehearing Bid

I have no words for this.   

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-09-26/wisconsin-id-ruling-withstands-appellate-rehearing-bid.html

http://www.democraticunderground.com/108412669
 
First, a quote from the Bloomberg link:

‘Voter Confusion’

“Allowing this law to take effect so close to the midterm election is a recipe for chaos, voter confusion and disenfranchisement,” Dale Ho, an ACLU attorney who argued the case before the appeals court this month, said in an e-mailed statement. “The court could have avoided this pandemonium and given Wisconsin voters a chance to cast their ballots free of obstruction. It failed to do so and we are evaluating our next step.”

For those that don't know, this law was passed and signed into law in 2011.  Leftists have been dragging their feet and fighting it tooth and nail but the stalling tactics have been exhausted and it's finally going to be applied to an actual election.

Now the DUmmies weigh in:

Response to madamvlb (Original post)Sat Sep 27, 2014, 10:54 AM
3rdwaydem (168 posts)
1. I'm both sad and angry to hear this.

Anybody that was without an ID has had three years to get their shit together.

Response to madamvlb (Original post)Sat Sep 27, 2014, 01:12 PM
Star Member Scuba (40,279 posts)
4. Our democracy, it seems, is lost.

It's not just lost Scuba, it DIED.  AGAIN.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jy8FSyI_Djg[/youtube]

[Texacon]

Not one liberal can give a good reason why these laws should not pass. I've talked to several and they have no good reason.

They should just straight up admit they're willing to allow fraud as long as their party wins an election.

KC

[I_B_Perky]

Not one liberal can give a good reason why these laws should not pass. I've talked to several and they have no good reason.

They should just straight up admit they're willing to allow fraud as long as their party wins an election.

KC

Only reason I ever heard of was that it is raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaacist.

[BattleHymn]

I have no words for this.   

Well, I can think of two:

[Carl]

I have no words for this

"Eat shit and die" comes to my mind.

[USA4ME]

Gothmog
 
2. Judge Richard Posner was one of the judges who voted to review this decision

Posner wrote the first opinion on the Indiana voter id law and has since realized that his prior opinion was wrong. Voter id laws are not to stop voter fraud but to promote voter suppression.

This is that fat, stupid primitive who is easily confused by facts. He has been harping on this for a while as though he has any understanding on the topic at all. As is typical, they have no choice but to mischaracterize the purpose of the law because to face the reason these laws are truly being enacted interfers with what he's been told to believe by his superiors, which he is obligated to obey and follow.

Kyle should stick to things he understands, like how to eat 4 dozen donuts a day.

.

[notaDUmmie]

Kyle is an idiot, and it's a condition he's been dealing with for years...

Here's a throwback from 2003, on a Disney discussion board, of all places:


http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=350828

If you read the responses, you'll see that everyone thought he was a douche back then, too.

[notaDUmmie]

Here's another oldie but goodie from good 'ole Kyle, this time posting as WWTBAMFAN (because he was banned as fklhou due to his argumentative postings):

http://www.disboards.com/showthread.php?t=713143&page=13

His posting style hasn't changed...wild allegations supported by fantasy and repeated at the end of the post with some comment about "how fun it will be when.."

He's such a dumbass.

[GOBUCKS]

They should just straight up admit they're willing to allow fraud as long as their party wins an election.

I would have gladly accepted fraudulent votes to keep the jug-eared muslim out of the White House.

[freedumb2003b]

‘Voter Confusion’

“Allowing this law to take effect so close to the midterm election is a recipe for chaos, voter confusion and disenfranchisement,” Dale Ho, an ACLU attorney who argued the case before the appeals court this month, said in an e-mailed statement. “The court could have avoided this pandemonium and given Wisconsin voters a chance to cast their ballots free of obstruction. It failed to do so and we are evaluating our next step.”

99.999% of all people in the USA have IDs -- you need them to get Welfare (thus we can toss out the idea of any democrats being disenfranchised).

The left has yet to bring out a SINGLE person who has no ID and is incapable of getting a (free BTW) one before voting day.

[JohnnyReb]

Don't most of the DUmmies have photo IDs down at the police station?

[landofconfusion80]

Don't most of the DUmmies have photo IDs down at the police station?

Also available at the bulletin board in the post office too.  They're commonly found at gas stations next to bounced checks as well

[wasp69]

I would have gladly accepted fraudulent votes to keep the jug-eared muslim out of the White House.

Shall we have that chiseled into America's tombstone as well?

[FiddyBeowulf]

99.999% of all people in the USA have IDs -- you need them to get Welfare (thus we can toss out the idea of any democrats being disenfranchised).

The left has yet to bring out a SINGLE person who has no ID and is incapable of getting a (free BTW) one before voting day.

The state of WI will also pay for the ID if it is for the purposes of voting. So a person without an ID goes to the DMV and tells them "I need an ID in order to vote"...BAM!!! Free.

DUmmies should be all over this, free stuff!!!