lonestarnut wonders; gets into a squibble-squabble with one strange black man

[franksolich]

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025377312

Oh my.

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 12:43 AM

So I was wondering

about the soon to be minority white population and the current minority populations. And what I was wondering about those populations is, what happens to racial discrimination protections when hispanics are no longer a minority, but a majority population? Will the laws be changed to do away with those protections or do they all of a sudden disappear, reverse, or become unenforceable when we hit that point (2043) or what happens? Interesting whatever happens.

^^^the primitive who predicted in December 2008 that hunger would end in America on January 20, 2009.

bravenak (5,792 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 12:48 AM

1. You mean what happens if the script gets flipped?

And brown people start targeting white people in, oh maybe, 75 years or so? I suppose that maybe evil people will use history to justify their poor treatment of whites and treat them like their ancestors treated their ancestors. Human nature is a ****ed up thing.

comment 2498:
http://conservativecave.com/index.php?topic=81827.2475

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 12:56 AM

4. Well that too I guess.

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:00 AM

15. Actually, ...

if current behavior would serve as a guide, I don't think there would be wide-spread retribution. There are plenty of Black folks in positions of authority in industry; but discrimination by Black/Hispanic bosses against their non-Black/non-Hispanic subordinates is relatively rare.

bravenak (5,792 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:07 AM

16. It will be the same way it is now.

Not outright lynchings, just a whole bunch of people not noticing.

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 12:49 AM

2. Do you not understand ...

the difference between "numeric minority status" and "minority status"?

There is a difference ... a huge difference (reference: all of colonized Africa, South Africa in particular.)

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 12:55 AM

3. Maybe I don't. I know who is a protected class and who is not now in the US under anti-discrimination laws currently and that is what I'm wondering about.

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 01:17 AM

5. I suggest you DO NOT know who is a "protected class", ...

under current anti-discrimination laws, as EVERYONE is a member of at least 3 protected classed ... even straight, white, males.
 
(Note: you're talking to someone with 15+ years of prosecuting Civil Rights cases.)

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 01:28 AM

8. Suggest whatever you want there. White male is not a protected class.

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 01:42 AM

11. B.S., ...

Both legally AND societally.

Stop now!

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 01:52 AM

13. Snort. Too funny.

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 01:56 AM

14. I will match my legal experience against your ...

what? snorting whiteness? any day.

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:07 AM

17. Not buying what you're selling.

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:15 AM

21. Google the phrase "Protected Class" ...

then admit your ignorance ,,, or just stop!

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:17 AM

22. Give it up dude. This isn't working for you or for me as I don't take orders from you or anyone

else.

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:21 AM

23. Yeah, Okay ...

wallow in your ignorance ... a simple google search, or just admitting that you know nothing about what you speak (on this topic) will inform you and end this.

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)   Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:26 AM

25. Last I checked it ok to wonder about things and discuss here at DU. It is not alright to race bait,

or ad hominem attack so knock it the **** off.

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:56 AM

27. Last time I checked ...

it was NOT okay for people to continue to argue a clearly incorrect fact*, i.e., the definition of "protected class", just because one can't admit that they don't know what the hell they are talking about; but too ... whatever ... to concede the point.
 
And stall all that "race-baiting" crap. I stand on my factually correct points ... every person is a maybe of at least 3 protected classes, including straight white men AND straight white men possess the ultimate societal protected class status.
 
So knock that the **** off.

*happens on Skins's island all the time.

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 03:04 AM

29. You **** off. Let's see if my calling you ignorant in more things than one on this thread alone

gets vanquished, as your race baiting bullshit remains as well as your statement calling me ignorant first. You apparently think you know everything, but apparently can't read or are too lazy to read the ****ing thread you ignorant ****. So practice your bullshit elsewhere.

bravenak (5,792 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 03:40 AM
to the one strange black man, regarding deleted comment below

32. Wow!!!

That hiiden reply was shameful and embarassing. I feel so bad that you had to get a nasty message like that. That was so messed up.

Scootaloo (12,643 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 02:59 AM
to the lonestarnut primitive

28. You asked, and were answered

You have chosen to retain your lack of knowledge, instead of actually looking it up. Since you're too enamored of your own know-nothing to go looking on your own, here's the results of a google search.
 In United States Federal anti-discrimination law, a protected class is a characteristic of a person which cannot be targeted for discrimination.The following characteristics are considered "Protected Classes" by Federal law:
 
Race – Civil Rights Act of 1964
Color – Civil Rights Act of 1964
Religion – Civil Rights Act of 1964
National origin – Civil Rights Act of 1964
Age (40 and over) – Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967
Sex – Equal Pay Act of 1963 and Civil Rights Act of 1964
Pregnancy – Pregnancy Discrimination Act
Citizenship – Immigration Reform and Control Act
Familial status – Civil Rights Act of 1968 Title VIII: Housing cannot discriminate for having children, with an exception for senior housing
Disability status – Vocational Rehabilitation and Other Rehabilitation Services of 1973 and Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Veteran status – Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 and Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
Genetic information – Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

Individual states can and do create other protected classes, which are protected under that state's law.
 
Now i suggest you go somewhere private where you can pull both of your feet out of your mouth. When you're done with that, maybe come back and apologize to 1SBM for your completely bass-ackwards accusations that he is race-baiting. That done, maybe go look up what the **** "ad hominem' means because it's pretty clear that's another phrase you're studiously clueless about.

lonestarnot This message was hidden by Jury decision.
response to scooter primitive above

[Gina]

  "You **** off!" "NO! You **** off!" 


 

[FiddyBeowulf]

lonestarnot (72,562 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 03:04 AM

29. You **** off. Let's see if my calling you ignorant in more things than one on this thread alone

gets vanquished, as your race baiting bullshit remains as well as your statement calling me ignorant first. You apparently think you know everything, but apparently can't read or are too lazy to read the ****ing thread you ignorant ****. So practice your bullshit elsewhere.

There are a lot of racist dog whistles in that one post. 

[BlueStateSaint]

There are a lot of racist dog whistles in that one post. 

Dem-on-dem 'fratricide' is a wonderful thing, no?

[diesel driver]

It's like watching a pissing duel between two skunks.   

[franksolich]

It's like watching a pissing duel between two skunks.   

It's difficult to decide which one to side with.

<<<usually sides with the underdog.

So.....is the underdog the lonestarnut, a woman, a fragile vessel who needs a man to help her, or is the underdog the one strange black man, a male yes, but from a once-oppressed class?

[Carl]

1StrongBlackMan (12,535 posts)    Wed Aug 13, 2014, 12:49 AM

2. Do you not understand ...

the difference between "numeric minority status" and "minority status"?

There is a difference ... a huge difference (reference: all of colonized Africa, South Africa in particular.)

In short you are saying you have no desire for racial equality.

[Dori]

It's difficult to decide which one to side with.

<<<usually sides with the underdog.

So.....is the underdog the lonestarnut, a woman, a fragile vessel who needs a man to help her, or is the underdog the one strange black man, a male yes, but from a once-oppressed class?

Why aren't the Klams coming to her rescue?  Or do they only go after "white" men?

[El Jefe]

They can't argue against the black guy, cuz dat be rasis. 

[USA4ME]

1StrongBlackMan

5. I suggest you DO NOT know who is a "protected class", ...

under current anti-discrimination laws, as EVERYONE is a member of at least 3 protected classed ... even straight, white, males.
 
(Note: you're talking to someone with 15+ years of prosecuting Civil Rights cases.)

I recall a post where the black twinkie said he was 23 yrs old. If someone here has search maybe they can find it. I know it claims to make good money, which is a lie.

.