Author Topic: the smartest people in the universe discuss union political contributions  (Read 1132 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline franksolich

  • Scourge of the Primitives
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 58722
  • Reputation: +3102/-173
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/10024809687

Oh my.

Quote
Bucky (42,298 posts)       Fri Apr 11, 2014, 06:21 PM

Online debate help: Do unions have the right to give their funds to political candidates?

I thought this was illegal. An idiot (whose party affiliation you'd never guess) just said that unions are free to give their money to candidates. I thought that was illegal.
 
Help sought before I descend into slaying this jackanapes.

Quote
Savannahmann (2,496 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 06:28 PM

1. Why shouldn't unions be free to donate?

http://www.opensecrets.org/overview/topcontribs.php?Bkdn=Source&Cycle=2014

Unions represent the workers, the people. They are free to donate as much as anyone else. The right to donate doesn't just reside with the Koch Brothers you know.

Quote
Bucky (42,298 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 06:31 PM

2. Thank, but I'm looking for facts, not opinions.

Do you know if unions can donate unlimited funds directly to candidates like private citizens now can?

Quote
Triloon (39 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 06:44 PM

4. dues vs contributions

Unions may not use funds from membership dues towards political campaigns, that is illegal under federal law. But Unions may collect voluntary contributions from the membership separately from dues to support political purposes. Anti-Union types make no distinction between these two activities, dues collection and pac contribution collection, but the distinction is very real and no one contributes political money against their wishes.

Quote
alp227 (24,950 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 06:51 PM

6. Thank you.

So it's a lie to say union dues go to political action committees?

Quote
Triloon (39 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 06:57 PM

8. yes.

It is not true, ever.

Quote
former9thward (9,566 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 08:09 PM

13. No it is not a lie.

Unions have PACs funded by voluntary contributions. As do corporations. Citizens United freed unions to do campaigns for a candidate as long as they do not directly coordinate with the candidate. That is why the AFL-CIO filed a brief in support of Citizens United.

Quote
Savannahmann (2,496 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 07:45 PM
in response to the buckless primitive's comment #2, way up above

10. Then you should have looked at the link.

But it's your world.

Quote
former9thward (9,566 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 08:06 PM

12. Unions and corporations are prohibited from directly contributing to federal candidates.

That has been the case since 1912. Both may indirectly contribute through PACs.
apres moi, le deluge

Milo Yiannopoulos "It has been obvious since 2016 that Trump carries an anointing of some kind. My American friends, are you so blind to reason, and deaf to Heaven? Can he do all this, and cannot get a crown? This man is your King. Coronate him, and watch every devil shriek, and every demon howl."

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
can....worms....
Go for it DUmmies.  :rotf:
Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline Carl

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 19839
  • Reputation: +1618/-100
http://www.nrtw.org/d/illegalpac.htm

Quote
It is unlawful for a labor union to take money from your paycheck for contributions to a federal PAC or for the federal PAC to accept such contributions without your written authorization. Recently, the Federal Election Commission has audited some well-known national union PACs to see if they had written authorizations from employees for the contributions the PACs were receiving. The results were astonishing. One national union PAC, according to the FEC audit, could not produce written authorizations for 93% of PAC contributions the FEC examined. Another national union PAC was unable to show authorizations for at least 67% of the contributions the FEC examined. This suggests a widespread problem: union PACs are making political contributions to federal candidates with employees' money taken without their written authorizations


Offline Maxiest

  • Chief Interruptor Officer
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2471
  • Reputation: +156/-101
  • IT Guru - Social Media Wizard - Recovery Advocate
And Unions would never do that, they have always been a shinning example of conformity and law in this country.
"The society that puts equality before freedom will end up with neither; the society that puts freedom before equality will end up with a great measure of both."

"Nothing is so permanent as a temporary government program."

"We have a system that increasingly taxes work and subsidizes nonwork."

-Milton Friedman

Offline Skul

  • Sometimes I drink water just to surprise my liver
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12475
  • Reputation: +914/-179
  • Chief of the cathouse
Quote
alp227 (24,950 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 06:51 PM

6. Thank you.

So it's a lie to say union dues go to political action committees?
Not a lie.  Where does the money come from?
Dues.

Quote
former9thward (9,566 posts)    Fri Apr 11, 2014, 08:09 PM

13. No it is not a lie.

Unions have PACs funded by voluntary contributions. As do corporations. Citizens United freed unions to do campaigns for a candidate as long as they do not directly coordinate with the candidate. That is why the AFL-CIO filed a brief in support of Citizens United.
The money contributions are not voluntary.  They just take it.
If you opt out of sending their chosen one part of your dues, you are then deemed to be a member "not in good standing".
Hardly voluntary when a threat is given.
Then-Chief Justice John Marshall observed, “Between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos.”

John Adams warned in a letter, “Remember democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet, that did not commit suicide.”

Offline Freeper

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17779
  • Reputation: +1311/-314
  • Creepy ass cracker.
Not a lie.  Where does the money come from?
Dues.
The money contributions are not voluntary.  They just take it.
If you opt out of sending their chosen one part of your dues, you are then deemed to be a member "not in good standing".
Hardly voluntary when a threat is given.

As voluntary as paying taxes.
I may not lock my doors while sitting at a red light and a black man is near, but I sure as hell grab on tight to my wallet when any democrats are close by.