I got this in an e-mail today.
From a friend in NE. I just happened to see this report the night it was on ABC.
My niece, Katelyn, stationed at Baluud, Iraq was assigned, with others of her detachment, to be escort/guard/watcher for Martha Raddatz of ABC News as she covered John McCain's recent trip to Iraq.
Katelyn and her Captain stood directly behind Raddatz as she queried GI's walking past. They kept count of the GI's and you should remember these numbers. She asked 60 GI's who they planned to vote for in
November. 54 said John McCain, 4 for Obama and 2 for Hillary.
Katelyn called home and told her Mom and Dad to watch ABC news the next night because she was standing directly behind Raddatz and maybe they'd see her on TV. Mom and Dad of course, called and emailed all the
kinfolk to watch the newscast and maybe see Katelyn.
Well, of course, we all watched and what we saw wasn't a glimpse of Katelyn, but got a hell'uva view of skewed news.
After a dissertation on McCain's trip and speech, ABC showed 5 GI's being asked by Raddatz how they were going to vote in November; 3 for Obama and 2 for Clinton. No mention of the 54 for McCain.
Okay, now this sounds credible, of course, but I'm wondering if it's true.
This is why I'm losing little sleep over Barry "Goldwater" Obama, and in fact believe that as long as John McCain doesn't screw something up (which is always possible, of course), the Obamaites will carry.....Vermont in the November elections.
For quite some time--at least the past 60 years--the news media has of course been biased, but during the past generation or so, it seems the news media has gone from distorting the news to creating its own reality, which has no resemblance at all to.....reality.
And then we all find out election night.
There is a vast dichotomy between what the news media reports, and what really is going on.
And so it's time decent and civilized people learn the same tricks learned the subjects under the socialist paradise of the workers and peasants for 75 years; to read between the lines, and to discount what's being said.
I think it's eminently reasonable--remember, I've been watching and reading the news media on politics since I was a little lad--to discount news media reports, polls, the primitives, whatnot, by circa 80%.
Wait until November 4, and see if I'm not right.