BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp

[anti-spelunker]

How dare you ?
I would be willing to bet that doctor voted for your messiah twice.
But, even so is the point you're trying to make is that conservatives are hypocritical about abortion that makes abortion morally acceptable ?

He's a Republican House member.  Typical teabagger attitude.  All about me.  Whatever I want.  People living off government subsidies is wrong, unless it's them.  Their disability is earned, everyone else is a freeloader.  That epitomizes exactly what the tea party stands for.  The guy votes AGAINST abortion rights while forcing women to have them because it's all about what he wants, forcing women to do as he says. 

[Big Dog]

Here's one.  His wife got two abortions.  http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/16/tennessee-republican-gave-testimony-detailing-wifes-abortions/

Here is a general article by Gary Bauer about men coercing women into having abortions.  http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/06/17/gary-bauer-and-daniel-allott-on-forced-abortions/2432769/  Of course his point is to absolve conservatives of responsibility, but nothing he provides says "liberals" are more likely to coerce women into having abortions.  In fact, liberals believe that choice is the woman's. 

You're moving the goalposts, Alex. That kind of shit may work over at the DUmp, but  you're sitting at the grown-up table now.

Your words, and I quote, were "Seems like we hear pretty often of some prominent conservative or evangelical that tries to force a woman into having an abortion.". The key words: "prominent conservative or evangelical" and "tries to force a woman to have an abortion". For your statement to be true, both elements must be true.

Your first citation said "An anti-abortion Republican congressman from Tennessee, first elected in 2010 with support from tea party activists, testified at divorce proceedings in 2001 that he and his wife mutually agreed on her getting two abortions, according to court transcripts released to CNN Friday." No force there. Fail #1.

Second citation: No "prominent conservatives or evangelicals" listed. Fail #2.

Wanna mulligan?

[anti-spelunker]

Aka agreeing with a lib.

No, I was thinking more of getting along despite political differences. 

[Chris_]

I did show my husband your picture and his only comment was that you were maybe 1/4 of a step up from Nadin.  That's not a compliment, my dear.

Ha.  I like your husband.

[Big Dog]

Does your concept of liberty include my not having the right to think and vote how I choose? 

Trying to change the subject?

Focus, Alex. Focus.

[anti-spelunker]

It's obvious you are desperate for attention from men.  I've been a part of this group here for five years+.  If I really wanted attention from the men here, I'd put on a bright red sweater and have a picture taken and post it on a public message board.  Oh wait, that's what YOU did.  

I have a husband who pays plenty of attention to me.  I'm comfortable in my own skin that I don't need constant attention.  I'm sure in your warped liberal mind, you think he probably forces himself on me.  

I did show my husband your picture and his only comment was that you were maybe 1/4 of a step up from Nadin.  That's not a compliment, my dear.  

The only attention whore here is you, Alex.  

I missed the memo where women aren't allowed to wear red.  Why do I give a **** what your husband thinks, or you for that matter?  That kind of comment shows you're a woman who hates other women.  I have no patience for such pettiness.  Go back to following your husband's orders and leave me alone. 

[Traveshamockery]

Ha.  I like your husband.

I like my husband, too.   

[Chris_]

I missed the memo where women aren't allowed to wear red.  Why do I give a **** what your husband thinks, or you for that matter?  That kind of comment shows you're a woman who hates other women.  I have no patience for such pettiness.  Go back to following your husband's orders and leave me alone. 

Empty words from an empty mind.

[anti-spelunker]

You people are getting nastier by the moment.  Obviously you don't want me here, so that's fine.  Keep up the hate.  You obviously live for it.  

[wasp69]

More on the anti-choice teabagger doctor forcing women to have abortions.  http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/10/10/report-anti-choice-republican-forced-mistress-to-have-an-abortion/

Rawstory?  Really?!?  What's next?  Mother Jones?

Tell me, DUmmie, do your deviant friends know you're using one of their favorite activities as a pejorative against your "enemies"?

[Chris_]

You people are getting nastier by the moment.  Obviously you don't want me here, so that's fine.  Keep up the hate.  You obviously live for it. 

Really?  Care to remind everyone here why you were banned the first time you showed up here?  I don't recall anyone here inviting you back.

Yeah, go ahead and lecture us about hate, you overeducated simpleton.

[wasp69]

Does your concept of liberty include my not having the right to think and vote how I choose? 

Gawd almighty....  Don't set that strawman on fire when you light the bong later, DUmbass.   

[Dori]

He's a Republican House member.  Typical teabagger attitude.  All about me.  Whatever I want.  People living off government subsidies is wrong, unless it's them.  Their disability is earned, everyone else is a freeloader.  That epitomizes exactly what the tea party stands for.  The guy votes AGAINST abortion rights while forcing women to have them because it's all about what he wants, forcing women to do as he says. 

The difference between Republicans and Democrats;

Top Republican leaders back Jim Tracy over U.S. Rep. Scott DesJarlais

DesJarlais, a South Pittsburg physician first elected in 2010, has been embroiled in controversy since the latter part of his 2012 race following revelations that he in 2000 had an affair with a patient and encouraged her to obtain an abortion when she said she was pregnant.

[obumazombie]

How dare you ?

You'll get along fine if you are honest and tell the truth.
Any subterfuge or intellectual dishonesty is challenged right away.

[thundley4]

Healthcare is "property"?  Are human beings also property?   

Liberals consider unborn babies that are human beings, to be their property and they can dispose of them at will.

[anti-spelunker]

It's obvious you are desperate for attention from men.  I've been a part of this group here for five years+.  If I really wanted attention from the men here, I'd put on a bright red sweater and have a picture taken and post it on a public message board.  Oh wait, that's what YOU did.  

I have a husband who pays plenty of attention to me.  I'm comfortable in my own skin that I don't need constant attention.  I'm sure in your warped liberal mind, you think he probably forces himself on me.  

I did show my husband your picture and his only comment was that you were maybe 1/4 of a step up from Nadin.  That's not a compliment, my dear.  

The only attention whore here is you, Alex.  

Your site has been informed that you are using that photo if violation of Photobucket's privacy and Photobucket provisions.  In downloading it or continuing to use a photo which is not legally publicly accessible on the web, you are engaging in THEFT.  That shows a complete disregard for property rights and makes you a CRIMINAL.  Each and every time someone here uses that photo, they are willfully and purposefully violating the property rights of others and engaging in criminal activity.  Photobucket removed those pictures for a reason, yet you lack enough respect for PROPERTY rights to follow the law.  That shows how completely hollow your political ideology is.  If property rights can be used to justify allowing 25,000 people to die every year, it's all good, but if violating property rights allows you to make fun of someone who dares to think differently from you, the hell with the law.  That is hypocrisy, which is of course the hallmark of teabaggers.  

[Big Dog]

How is healthcare anymore property than education or the military, both of which are funded by public dollars?  All are services.  Do you want no public schools?  Do you want to go back to the days of private armies that paid themselves through pillaging?  Or is it only the maintenance of human life, and not its killing, that is too insignificant to be a public right? 

Bad news for you, kid. There ain't no such thing as a "public right."

The fact that you believe there is, says it all.

[wasp69]

You people are getting nastier by the moment.  Obviously you don't want me here, so that's fine.  Keep up the hate.  You obviously live for it.  

What's the matter, dear?  Getting your sorry ass kicked?  Nobody buying your bullshit?  Hard to learn your propaganda doesn't survive first contact with reality?  Cognitive dissonance making your ears ring?

Cry me a river...

[Big Dog]

No, I was thinking more of getting along despite political differences. 

It's more than political differences. If you had followed the link I gave you, you'd understand that.

i take this liberty stuff seriously.

[Traveshamockery]

Your site has been informed that you are using that photo if violation of Photobucket's privacy and Photobucket provisions.  In downloading it or continuing to use a photo which is not legally publicly accessible on the web, you are engaging in THEFT.  That shows a complete disregard for property rights and makes you a CRIMINAL.  Each and every time someone here uses that photo, they are willfully and purposefully violating the property rights of others and engaging in criminal activity.  Photobucket removed those pictures for a reason, yet you lack enough respect for PROPERTY rights to follow the law.  That shows how completely hollow your political ideology is.  If property rights can be used to justify allowing 25,000 people to die every year, it's all good, but if violating property rights allows you to make fun of someone who dares to think differently from you, the hell with the law.  That is hypocrisy, which is of course the hallmark of teabaggers.  

Go **** yourself.  I'm sure no one else would want to come near your skanky ass. 

[RayRaytheSBS]

That shows how completely hollow your political ideology is.  If property rights can be used to justify allowing 25,000 people to die every year, it's all good, but if violating property rights allows you to make fun of someone who dares to think differently from you, the hell with the law.

So in this thread you state 25,000 people(we are lead to believe) are killed by guns. But in the freeloading free for all on skins island thread you state this:

If they weren't so efficient at killing people, including children, I could ignore them.  32,000 deaths a year should not be ignored

Which figure is it 25,000 or 32,000? Please show your work.

[Traveshamockery]

Oh look.  She ran away. 

 

[wasp69]

If property rights can be used to justify allowing 25,000 people to die every year, it's all good,

What in the Hell are you yammering about?

but if violating property rights allows you to make fun of someone who dares to think differently from you, the hell with the law.    

"Property" posted on an open forum, available for all to see and save...  Heh...

That is hypocrisy, which is of course the hallmark of teabaggers.

What is your problem, DUmmie?  Don't you like sexual deviants?  Isn't two men kissing each other's parts a sacrament to you freaks?

[obumazombie]

Go **** yourself.  I'm sure no one else would want to come near your skanky ass. 

I would say "how dare you?", but it's so appropriate.

I've never seen the referenced picture, and never would want to.
Some women are so repulsive on the inside, that no one wants to be around them no matter how attractive they might be.
From what I understand about you bane, your inside and outside are about as attractive as something the cat had in the alley.

[Dori]

 If property rights can be used to justify allowing 25,000 people to die every year, it's all good.

As opposed to the 1.2 million abortions a year?