BainsBane Propositioned By A Pimp

[txradioguy]

When you decide your constitutional 2nd amendment right trumps the rest of the constitution including my right to life

Clearly you don't understand that the 2nd Amendment protects your "right to life".

Without the 2nd Amendment the rest of the Constitution would have been tossed out a long time ago.

[wasp69]

You have a lot of insults and nothing else.  You are factually wrong, so much so it's startling, I gave you a simple statement of fact. That you haven't bothered to inform yourself on abortion restrictions is obvious, probably because you refuse to read any decent news source.  You can buy a gun in virtually every town and county in America while abortion restrictions have increased at a rapid pace...

If there were ever a being on this planet that could type a response so full of ignorant, sophomoric, vapid solipsisms, I would be hard pressed to look past you to find them.  How, in the name of Almighty God, you could arrogantly claim so much intelligence and sophistication while simultaneously displaying the obvious vacuum in your head is beyond me.  I can only surmise that the wind whistling as it passes from one ear to the next drowns out anything that may reach your bubble.

The Second Amendment was conceived, debated, and ratified on the premise of the right of the individual to protect themselves as well as serve as a means of national self defense; hence the term "militia" as it is written into the text.  As codified, it is an unalienable right to the individual as well as a safeguard, and means to protect, the rest of the Bill of Rights.  It is the height of hyper emotional babble to suggest that somehow recognizing an individual's defense of their natural state of being (free) is somehow trumping your "right to life".  The Second Amendment is the ultimate recognition of the "right to life".

You somehow conflating a direct "right" as codified into our Founding Document is similar to a fabricated right to privacy from the Fourteenth Amendment is as laughable as it is stupid.  If you were even half as aware of that which you claim, you would know damn good and well that the "justicability" of a woman's right to privacy as it applies to abortion was deliberately left in the hands of the States.  Nowhere, in any of your words or the stupid ass chart you linked, can you show where any woman's right to privacy was abridged, though I do welcome you to try.

During this same period, gun rights have expanded.  Shall issue concealed carry has systematically expanded throughout the nation.  Chicago's gun ban was struct down.  The gun lobby has continued to increase influence...

A direct right, as spelled out in our Founding Documents, can be either recognized or abridged - never "expanded".  Suggestion otherwise shows an at best tenuous grasp on how our government is supposed to work and a fundamental disconnect of any common sense.

...with some exceptions in CT, CO and a few other places. 

Those "other places" would be New York and Maryland.  The good people of Colorado are going to show Hickenlooper and the liberal trash something really neat this coming November; New York is well on its way to having a good chunk of that stupid gun grab invalidated; Connecticut liberals may find themselves in for a bloody fight in the coming years; and Maryland...  Well, I hope O'Malley has enjoyed his time in the spotlight.
 

thanks to your party's efforts to impose big government on women's bodies.

Congratulations, Alexandra.  Your male, democrat masters applaud your recognition of your place in their society - reduced to the value of your parts.

You're obviously a mole with an ax to grind against me.  Get over it.   

Yeah, because there's no possibility that you could ever possibly be wrong, could it?  Has to be a DUmmie gun nut that is "stalking" you...   

You're not half as smart as you think you are.

The same could be said of some others on this thread, dear. 

[wasp69]

Fri Jan 10, 2014, 12:00 AM

Star Member BainsBane (22,346 posts)

A weird thing happened to me tonight
I was at the grocery store tonight and a guy said to me: "Do you want to make more money than you do in your current job? I live on Cedar. I can help you market your assets."

"My assets," I asked incredulously.

I turned to walk away. I didn't say much because I wasn't even sure what had happened. I'm not exactly young anymore. My "assets" are middle-aged.

I don't think anyone has propositioned me for paid sex since I was 14. I didn't know what to do.

Response to Arcanetrance (Reply #6)

Tue Apr 30, 2013, 09:38 AM

Star Member BainsBane (22,346 posts)
7.

The other thing about stripping is what happens as you age. There isn't much call for menopausal strippers.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/125521362#post7

Looks like the "call" came and you walked away from it, Alexandra. 

[BannedFromDU]

     Aw, man. I missed out.

     All I can say is that Alex has given us an object lesson in the distinction between sophistry and intelligence.

     See if you can guess what she's shown here.

[wasp69]

I don't do grave dancing and have said I don't like it, but usually I just skip those threads.  

I do so love how you come in here (if it actually is you, Alexandra), and pretend to clutch some mantle of moral purity in regards to, well, pretty much anything.

You can hold me accountable for anything and everything I say, but not for some DU collective opinion you assume everyone holds.    

I have something I want to show you, dear:

Response to Lone_Star_Dem (Original post)

Thu Apr 18, 2013, 06:03 PM

Star Member BainsBane (22,346 posts)
56. This doesn't look good for the country

I was hoping they would be some fringe domestic group because then the fallout would be less significant. Imagine all the shit Fox and the Repugs are going to raise if these guys turn out to be Muslim. The fear mongering and finger pointing is going to be intense.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022702986#post56

Don't participate in grave dancing?  The jury is still out on that one, but has rendered a "guilty" verdict of rolling in the blood of the innocent to score some type of bullshit political point.

Incidentally, dear - this is one of the many comments to which I could point that makes you "un****able".  The sick hate that bleeds through your skin has more to do with your desirability than your fading looks.

[wasp69]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

I guess we can add "catty bitch" to your resume as well, huh?

[HawkHogan]

That is what blew me away, CMD.  Many, many, restrictions on abortion?   I'm still waiting to hear WHERE she is talking about.  If women were being denied abortions, NOW, the DOJ, Miss Hillary, Madame Pelosi, most of the Senate and the entire Obama administration would be suing any medical facility that even tried to pull that.

There's definitely a lot of restrictions on abortions... I mean there have only been 55 million abortions performed in the United States since Roe v. Wade.  Without those pesky right wingers and their attempts to eliminate late-term abortions, we could be celebrating 100 to 200 million abortions. 

[Bad Dog]

I'm starting to share the doubters as to the actual identity if our chew toy.  I have a solution.

 

Edit to add:  Do it for the children Alex.

[GOBUCKS]

I mean there have only been 55 million abortions performed in the United States since Roe v. Wade.  Without those pesky right wingers and their attempts to eliminate late-term abortions, we could be celebrating 100 to 200 million abortions.

That's a strange situation. There have been tens of millions of murdered children, the vast majority of whom would have grown up to be moonbat voters, since abortion is so rare among responsible families.

To replace their murdered babies in the electorate, democrats want to bring in millions of mexicans. If they took responsibility for their children, they wouldn't need illegal mexicans.

[HawkHogan]

That's a strange situation. There have been tens of millions of murdered children, the vast majority of whom would have grown up to be moonbat voters, since abortion is so rare among responsible families.

To replace their murdered babies in the electorate, democrats want to bring in millions of mexicans. If they took responsibility for their children, they wouldn't need illegal mexicans.

I guess it's a catch-22.  If these aborting liberals had been ethical and decided to give these children up for adoption, there's a strong chance that conservative families would have adopted many of them.  Instead they thought the more ethical method was to suck the babies brains out or dismember it inside their wombs. 

[vesta111]

Now this old lady needs to waddle in.


To my surprise Louisiana law in the 70's was still under Neapolitan law.

All children born to a woman were the property of the fathers. All property the wife had belonged to the husband--in other words a husband could sell the wife's family home without telling her. he could legally throw her out of her inherited home and take her children.

When a marriage took place, all money or inheritance were transferred to the husband.     Pre Nups were few and little known at the time.
Yes this was states rights to make their laws.

So what the heck is this Liberal bitchin about ?  

Then the fact that few workers have time to even think  on who they are going to vote for is a strange thing.

Does  anyone think those on welfare spend time watching the news ??        
Do we expect a factory worker to come home after 10 hours of work to give a crap what is going as long as they have their job ??

I don't know here I am going here,  but I do hope this poster responds to me.

[anti-spelunker]

You're kidding right?  You have to have this explained to you how it effects both?  Really?



ETA:  Took all of 30 seconds of a generic google search of "cost effects of epa regulation" to find this.

This is just the effect of the new draconian regulations they have in story for the coal industry in 2014.

http://www.arizonadailyindependent.com/2013/12/10/economic-consequences-of-epa-power-plant-regulations/\

That is an assertion, not evidence.  Additionally, coal is one of many industries. 
Wages are a key issue.  Some Republicans want to abolish the minimum wage so that we can compete with third world countries in terms of labor costs.  What do you think that will do to the the average wage and ability of women to be homemakers?

[anti-spelunker]

There are roughly 20,000 laws on the books regulating firearms.

How many on abortion?

Yeah that's what I thought.

So is it the number of laws or how easy it is to acquire a gun or an abortion?  Do you need to submit to a transvaginal ultrasound before buying a gun?  Do you need to travel hundreds of miles?  No and no.  It's not even close. 

[anti-spelunker]

I love it when a lib runs out of taking points in an argument. Then it's time to bring out the big persuasion guns with retorts like "That's complete bullshit".
By libs I mean Bane.

Libs?  That must be why you all need an imposed (or self-imposed) hour break before each proclamation of "bullshit."

[anti-spelunker]

You didn't address the main point.

Is making the assertion that all men need anti-rape education sexist ? Yes, or no.

I don't think there is an assertion that "all men need rape education." Rather that society, and men and women generally, benefit from such education, just as we benefit from anti-bullying campaigns.  I did address this issues earlier in the thread. 

[Chris_]

Libs?  That must be why you all need an imposed (or self-imposed) hour break before each proclamation of "bullshit."

Not all of us.

[wasp69]

Some Republicans want to abolish the minimum wage so that we can compete with third world countries in terms of labor costs. 

Provide evidence.

[franksolich]

There's definitely a lot of restrictions on abortions... I mean there have only been 55 million abortions performed in the United States since Roe v. Wade.  Without those pesky right wingers and their attempts to eliminate late-term abortions, we could be celebrating 100 to 200 million abortions. 

Score.

Awesome!

[franksolich]

Whoa.  I just noticed something.

She's currently the leading poster on conservativecave, and by a wide margin.

Top 10 Poster This week
93 anti-spelunker 
63 obumazombie   
53 Big Dog 
50 Bad Dog   
49 Freeper   
36 Mr Mannn 
36 Tucker   
25 franksolich     
23 liana   
21 wasp69

[Skul]

Clearly you don't understand that the 2nd Amendment protects your "right to life".

Without the 2nd Amendment the rest of the Constitution would have been tossed out a long time ago.

I'm still waiting for the reply to this.

I'd also like to see a quote from the Constitution that recognizes abortion as a right.

[GOBUCKS]

The most offensive thing about Jugs is her use of an American flag as an avatar.

[wasp69]

"Equal rights" - equality under the law. Not preference for women because you claim "disenfranchisement."

You are a sexist, and now you're just trying to make excuses for yourself.

You know, BD, you're not the first to say this:

Response to BainsBane (Reply #66)

Fri Jan 10, 2014, 07:22 PM

MADem (96,140 posts)
72.

I DO get to tell you what is a worse offense for a woman; you can disregard what I say, or not, but you are not my censor. And you really need, IMO, to stop acting like you are the Net Nanny and Board Censor for everything " female gender related" on this board, because you're not that--and you also need to just appreciate the fact that you don't come off well at all when you start dramatic threads like this one. And just because you INSIST that the W-word or the S-word or the B-word are "women's words," doesn't mean that's true. If you're going to get outraged about "gender slurs," you'd better get busy on firing up some outrage against the "D" word and the "Pr" word, too--otherwise we'll have to conclude that you have a gender bias. And don't even try telling me "It's not the same" because if we're going to work towards a goal of equality for all, it's not right to insult people because they can deal with it or they haven't been insulted as much up to now. You'd better start walking the walk, or be prepared to be regarded as a hypocrite.

You ask questions of the "When did you stop beating your children?" variety. There's no winning to answer one of your "questions." They're always phrased in the form of an accusation. I'm sick of them, frankly, and I'll bet I'm not alone. So perhaps YOU need to save some of that bullshit, yourself, instead of giving me advice you won't take yourself.

Most DUers--the overwhelming majority, in fact, save the trolls, shit-stirrers, and bullshit artists-- are not sexists, misogynists or women haters, though to listen to you, you'd think the joint was infested with them. You pick apart people's words, point at them, and bellow "J'ACCUSE!!!!!" like you are the arbiter here--well, let me tell you--you aren't. You have an opinion, like everyone else--and we all know what opinions are like.

For example, this thread is just a shit stir. It's META, it's whining about DU, and it isn't appropriate for GD. Of course, it's also a massive train wreck, so it draws gawkers, myself included, to my great shame. Yes, I'm guilty of taking the shitty bait you dangled. I'm already regretting it. I do wonder, though, if in order to read DU every day, I have to continue to trash dozens of threads like this one--it's getting to the point where the board is overloaded with bullshit-poutrage that isn't really an issue for most of us who identify as Democrats and other progressives.

The ass whoopin' DUmmie Alexandra got from MADem was pretty epic in that thread.  A brief sampling:

Response to MADem (Reply #72)

Fri Jan 10, 2014, 08:06 PM

Star Member quinnox (18,757 posts)
84. +1000. You just summed up almost every post

made by that one. And they aren't the only one from that sub-group who specializes in the "questions" technique, which are just thinly veiled accusations. Its definitely a slimy and noxious way to pollute the Du atmosphere, that is for sure. Running around threads accusing duers of being horrible things if they don't agree with someone seems to be a specialty, but I think you are not the only one who notices and finds it pretty tiresome and like you said, bullcrap.

Response to MADem (Reply #89)

Fri Jan 10, 2014, 09:22 PM

Star Member BainsBane (22,355 posts)
90. I'll make this brief and save you time

Last edited Fri Jan 10, 2014, 10:30 PM - Edit history (4)
Anyone who thinks he has a right to determine what I can think and feel is someone I have no interest in discussion with, period.

Response to BainsBane (Reply #90)

Fri Jan 10, 2014, 09:52 PM

MADem (96,140 posts)
96. You're stuck on transmit, aren't you?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024310566#post72

 

[Traveshamockery]

The most offensive thing about Jugs is her use of an American flag as an avatar.

H5!  If she posts at the Dummocrat Underground, she's anti-American. 

[HawkHogan]

H5!  If she posts at the Dummocrat Underground, she's anti-American.  

She hates American exceptionalism, but still wants to use an American flag as her avatar.  The only things she loves about this country are unfettered abortions and same-sex marriages.  

[Skul]

She hates American exceptionalism, but still wants to use an American flag as her avatar.  The only things she loves about this country are unfettered abortions and same-sex marriages.  

Something like this might be more appropriate.