Author Topic: Grim proving ground for Obama's housing policy (policies are a complete failure)  (Read 1918 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wretched Excess

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15284
  • Reputation: +485/-84
  • Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happy Hour
Obama's first attempt at fulfilling his utopian ideal fell well short of the mark;  it was and remains an abject
disaster.  we finally get a peek at BHO as a cog in the chicago political machine.  cronyism runs rampant.  contracts
are awarded to developers who are major campaign donors.  a new and devastating link to convicted felon tony
rezko is revealed in this story.  many of those responsible for this taxpayer ripoff and brazen exploitation of thousands
of lower income americans are presently high ranking officials in his presidential campaign.

and he promises more of the same if elected.  from his website:

  • Fully Fund the Community Development Block Grant: Obama will fully fund the Community Development Block
    Grant program and engage with urban leaders across the country to increase resources to the highest-need Americans.


and I assume that BHO considers this one of his better resume entries for the highest office in the land.

this is a very lengthy piece, but well worth the read.


Quote
Grim proving ground for Obama's housing policy

The candidate endorsed subsidies for private entrepreneurs to build low-income units. But, while he garnered support from developers, many projects in his former district have fallen into disrepair.


CHICAGO - The squat brick buildings of Grove Parc Plaza, in a dense neighborhood that Barack Obama represented for eight years as a state senator, hold 504 apartments subsidized by the federal government for people who can't afford to live anywhere else.

But it's not safe to live here.

About 99 of the units are vacant, many rendered uninhabitable by unfixed problems, such as collapsed roofs and fire damage. Mice scamper through the halls. Battered mailboxes hang open. Sewage backs up into kitchen sinks. In 2006, federal inspectors graded the condition of the complex an 11 on a 100-point scale - a score so bad the buildings now face demolition.

Grove Parc has become a symbol for some in Chicago of the broader failures of giving public subsidies to private companies to build and manage affordable housing - an approach strongly backed by Obama as the best replacement for public housing.

As a state senator, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee coauthored an Illinois law creating a new pool of tax credits for developers. As a US senator, he pressed for increased federal subsidies. And as a presidential candidate, he has campaigned on a promise to create an Affordable Housing Trust Fund that could give developers an estimated $500 million a year.

But a Globe review found that thousands of apartments across Chicago that had been built with local, state, and federal subsidies - including several hundred in Obama's former district - deteriorated so completely that they were no longer habitable.

Grove Parc and several other prominent failures were developed and managed by Obama's close friends and political supporters. Those people profited from the subsidies even as many of Obama's constituents suffered. Tenants lost their homes; surrounding neighborhoods were blighted.

Some of the residents of Grove Parc say they are angry that Obama did not notice their plight. The development straddles the boundary of Obama's state Senate district. Many of the tenants have been his constituents for more than a decade.

"No one should have to live like this, and no one did anything about it," said Cynthia Ashley, who has lived at Grove Parc since 1994.

Obama's campaign, in a written response to Globe questions, affirmed the candidate's support of public-private partnerships as an alternative to public housing, saying that Obama has "consistently fought to make livable, affordable housing in mixed-income neighborhoods available to all."

The campaign did not respond to questions about whether Obama was aware of the problems with buildings in his district during his time as a state senator, nor did it comment on the roles played by people connected to the senator.

Much More
« Last Edit: June 27, 2008, 12:37:57 PM by Wretched Excess »

Offline Flame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4361
  • Reputation: +166/-34
Subsidized housing...why should someone take care of  something if they aren't paying for it?  It falls into bad enough disrepair, they can just call on the gov't, saying this place is unhabitable (doesn't matter that it got that way 'cause I didn't take care of it), and move on to somewhere else.

Offline NHSparky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24431
  • Reputation: +1280/-617
  • Where are you going? I was gonna make espresso!
More proof of the expression that nobody washes a rental car.
“Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him better take a closer look at the American Indian.”  -Henry Ford

Offline Chris_

  • Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 46845
  • Reputation: +2028/-266
More proof of the expression that nobody washes a rental car.
I hosed one off, once. But I had been driving it 2 months and couldn't make out the color anymore...
If you want to worship an orange pile of garbage with a reckless disregard for everything, get on down to Arbys & try our loaded curly fries.

Offline docstew

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4741
  • Reputation: +282/-187
  • My Wife is awesome!
More proof of the expression that nobody washes a rental car.

hi5 for that nugget of wisdom, excellent point

Offline DixieBelle

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12143
  • Reputation: +512/-49
  • Still looking for my pony.....
good find WE.

The rented car analogy is perfect. Take away personal responsibility and having a financial stake in something and people don't care what happens to it. Same mentality in govt housing. Why take care of it if you aren't paying for it or own it?
I can see November 2 from my house!!!

Spread my work ethic, not my wealth.

Forget change, bring back common sense.
-------------------------------------------------

No, my friends, there’s only one really progressive idea. And that is the idea of legally limiting the power of the government. That one genuinely liberal, genuinely progressive idea — the Why in 1776, the How in 1787 — is what needs to be conserved. We need to conserve that fundamentally liberal idea. That is why we are conservatives. --Bill Whittle