No one ever said that DU wasn't corrupt and inconsistent, much like the Democrat Party itself. Some posters over there are politically connected and have enough pull and friends to stay around.
If you really want to impress someone here, show me a thread on DU which contains exactly the same vitriol toward 0loser as is directed at GWB, and show me that the thread lasts more than a few
minutes and its OP NOT banned.
You should really do your homework before offering that mess as proof of anything.
So exactly what threshold of post count and what threshold of anti-Obama language is going to stand up to your ridiculous standard of my contention that DU does allow criticism of Obama?
If you say under 100 posts--that's stupid. Since there are people (even on CC) who specifically create accounts to go over there and disrupt, DU SHOULD be on the lookout for disruptors. Its mission is different than CC. Similar to how quickly Free Republic will ban people who are clearly espousing liberal views and deriding conservatives.
I'm appreciative the mods have let me stay on here as long as they have. I try to be a little more toned down than I was in the beginning when I came loaded for bear. But for you to state DU absolutely brooks no dissent from a party line is inaccurate.
So will 1000 post threshold work? 500? And how critical must they be? You cannot rule out someone criticising Obama for allowing TPP or the like. That is still open criticism of the Democratic Party's leader.